Preview

Courtroom Work Group Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Work Group Analysis
The courtroom workgroup is made up of people in the criminal justice system such as judges and prosecutors. They decide what happens in every case that is presented in the system and use their discretion on whether to deny or accept a case. The way that cases are identified as serious depends on the evidence that is available. Other factors such as witnesses, prior record, and criminal activity is all taken into account. If the courtroom workgroup decides that there isn’t enough information for the case to go on they drop it because they see no use in wasting their time with it. Walker mentions that most of the cases like rape are what get dropped because of insufficient evidence and people tend to see it as the offender getting off the hook (2015, p. 66). It may be seen as an injustice because those cases don’t go through to have a trial, but too much work is put into cases that the best option is to just put all the effort in the ones that will get a conviction. Those other cases that are seen as more serious because of prior record and the type of crime committed usually have a high going rate. Some crimes like murder are known to have higher going rate because of how …show more content…
The selection the courtroom workgroup makes can also lead to longer sentences because they are the people that choose the going rate. The criminal justice system tries to speed up the process because of how many cases they have to deal with which leaves the workgroup to weight what cases are most important than others. This fast process can lead to the system having wrongful convictions because of so many cases they have. Walker talks about Huff’s study that estimated on wrongful convictions and concluded that about one percent were due to mistakes from the criminal justice system (2015, p. 76). One percent or not wrongful convictions is still a problem and the way the Courtroom workgroup decide that should be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Chart
    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courtroom Chart

    | |matters; they don't work with civil cases such as |citizens. This makes the prosecutor's duties somewhat |…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cjs/220 Case Attrition Research Paper
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cjs/220 Case Attrition Research Paper

    The exercising of discretion by all system actors, public and private, and from the nature of the criminal process itself is a result of case attrition. Basically, case attrition is when an arrest does not end in a trial conviction, which happens quite often in the court justice system. This is not new experience, nor one limited to the United States; several other Western countries and in the early parts of the twentieth century reported the same high rates of case attrition (encyclopedia.com). The effect case attrition has on the criminal justice system is observed at the different levels of the criminal justice process, because an arrest or no arrest affects everything.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP
    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WK 3 Individual COURTROOM WORKGROUP

    One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Week 3 CJA 394 Court Trends

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Week 3 CJA 394 Court Trends

    In other occasions court administrators, prosecutors and judges prefer to go for plea bargains to help reduce case volumes and in other cases granted time to the parties so they can prepare themselves for the case or to obtain further documentation to avoid losing time during the next hearing moving the case for a date where they might not have such big overload. Another option that the court administrators recur is to divide cases upon the crime in order to fit all short non complicated crimes in a day vs. having many complicated cases all together in one day since that would delay the case flow.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Observation: Court Case
    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Courtroom Observation: Court Case

    This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Professional Standards: Necessary Homicide
    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courtroom Professional Standards: Necessary Homicide

    Everyone thinks they have it exactly right on TV shows like Law and Order or CSI. Someone commits a crime, is charged and found guilty all in an hour or two. For many crimes this is not the case, the offender may never be found, or someone maybe falsely convicted. It all hinges on a set of people. The judge, the defense attorney and the prosecutor. All of which are not perfect like the US Judicial System, and justice is not always served. Individual rights are violated due to prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel, and judicial misconduct. In some instances, the guilty…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Participants' Professional Standards
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Courtroom Participants' Professional Standards

    In Virginia State, Jay Lentz was convicted by a jury in July 2003 for the kidnapping and murder of his wife. The jury recommended that Mr. Lentz spend life in prison; however, the United States District Judge Gerald Lee dismissed the kidnapping charge due to lack of evidence. Two weeks after the judge convicted Mr. Lentz of murder, he found evidence of prosecutorial misconduct therefore the judge ordered a new trial for the alleged murder charge.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper
    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Code Of Hammurabi Of Mesopotamia
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Code Of Hammurabi Of Mesopotamia

    When people commit a crime they are sent to prison and sentenced according to the crime they committed. Crimes can range from drug convictions, petty crimes to heinous crimes such as murder. There is also the case of a small percent of offenders associated with recidivism due to the longer lengths of time spent in prison and the relationship behind it. The assumption is that prisoners serving short sentences have a far better chance of being rehabilitated once they get out of jail, can find employment and integrate quickly back into…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Bargaining

    In his January 15, 2013 article “Dramatic Increase in Percentage Criminal Cases Being Plea Bargained,” Matt Clarke writes that sentencing power is gradually shifting from judges to prosecutors. Because of legislation that allows prosecutors to determine the statutes under which to charge a defendant, an increased coercive effect has been created. Defendants who may have winnable cases or even those who may be innocent opt for accepting plea agreements because they are convinced the risk of going to trial is too great. This shift has resulted in a noticeable reduction in the number of cases being tried by a jury. According to Clarke’s article, some experts say the number of federal criminal defendants who choose a trial over plea bargaining has decreased, since 1977, from twenty-five percent to about three percent. Another factor for possible decreases in trial cases is the risk of ‘annoying’ a judge. Defendants may be foregoing their constitutional right to trial by jury because they fear retribution. “There are some judges who will punish you for going to trial,” acknowledged Bill Cervone, the state attorney in Florida and former head of the Florida Prosecuting Attorneys Association. “Legally, you cannot impose a longer sentence on someone because they exercised their right to trial. Factually, there are ways to do it.” (Prison Legal…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Plea Bargaining In Court
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is Plea Bargaining In Court

    The majorities of individuals charged with a crime, whether state or federal never see the inside of a courtroom, and if they do see a courtroom it is not in the context that one would think. The defendant is not sitting in a courtroom full of spectators watching as attorneys argue the guilt or innocence of the defendant to twelve jurors who will eventually decide their fate. This perception of a courtroom has been molded into the minds of Americans through television. The real picture of how the majority of cases are tried is not in a courtroom, but a small room with the prosecutor who pushes the defendant to take a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is a process that uses negotiation to entice the defendant into pleading guilty to a lesser charge or only one of several charges without going to trial, which is a violation…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Court Case Analysis
    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal Court Case Analysis

    Does notoriety affect the outcome of a criminal court proceeding? A trial’s outcome should not be based on the notoriety of it, yet it is. Due to media coverage, the length of the trial, and the notoriety of the people who committed the crime, the outcome of the trial is affected. The Manson trials and the trial of Leopold and Loeb are two prime example of how notoriety can affect a criminal court proceeding. An analysis of two criminal court proceedings, the Manson trial and the trial of Leopold and Loeb, reveals that notoriety does affect criminal court proceedings. Even though criminal court proceedings should be based on unbiased information and evidence, overall, the notoriety of the case impacts it.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom work group week 3
    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Courtroom work group week 3

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Observation In A Courtroom Trial
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Observation In A Courtroom Trial

    For this service learning project I went downtown first to the Daley center, then to the Circuit Court of Cook County. While there, I observed various criminal court cases, most which dealt with domestic violence and abuse. There was one particular case that stuck out to me the most. Torense Arnold vs.Latrarice Johnson was the second criminal case, with the man being the defendant against charges of domestic battery, burglary, and felony. Latrice Johnson had described her brutal relationship with Torense as an abusive obsession in which she wanted to get out of. She had been dragged by her hair throughout their house and had nail marks on her hands and face. Torence then pleaded guilty and was held at a 150,000 dollar bond, Latrice was issued an order of protection against him and her siblings.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Justice System Failing
    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Justice System Failing

    Senator Jim Webb writes in Clear and Frost’s article, “ America’s Criminal Justice System has deteriorated to the point that it is a national disgrace.” And that is the truth. The criminal justice system has many flaws that need to be fixed. There are several issues that need to be handled and dealt with properly. Tweaks need to be made to ensure that criminals are sentenced properly. But the way that criminals are picked out and failed by the system is preposterous. Although the Justice System establishes rules and makes sense out of chaos, the justice system needs reform because 25% of the nation is incarcerated, there are more drug users than murderers or serial offenders, and there are private prisons that…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics