court visit
University of Cebu
Sanciangko St., Cebu City, Philippines
In partial fulfillment in the subject
Political Science 6
"Court Visit"
Submitted to:
Atty. Grace Isanor Giduquio- Larona
Submitted by:
Jean Bulac Marcos
Court Visit
Date of court visit: February 10, 2014
Courtroom visited: Room
Judge: Wilfredo A. Dagatan
On Monday the 10th of February 2014, we, the Political Science 6 students attended a court hearing at Mandaue Palace of Justice at court _ which had a four hearings on the same day. The said hearing started at 9 in the morning, yet some of the people who were engaged in the cases were not yet there. Most of the work was in matters for mention. There were only four matters scheduled for hearing during the day, whereas I witnessed it with a confusions in my mind about the way they did the hearing. Hence there was an emphasis on matters for mention. Mandaue Palace of Justice has a system whereby they allocate different types of cases for different days.
The first hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 41653 for Violation of Section 1 of Article VI. People of the Philippines vs. Mario T. Dizon. The second hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 41328 for Falsification of Pri. Doc. People of the Philippines vs. Christina H. Alferez. The third hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 40663-9 for Violation of BP. BLG. 22 and the Criminal Case No/s. 40670-80 for Violation of BP. BLG. 22. People of the Philippines vs. Venerando C. Olandria. The last hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 38544 and Criminal case No/s. 36653-57 for Violation of BP. BLG. 22. People of the Philippines vs. Lady Ann Y. Domino. All the said hearings was rescheduled by the Judge for some matters.
Sanciangko St., Cebu City, Philippines
In partial fulfillment in the subject
Political Science 6
"Court Visit"
Submitted to:
Atty. Grace Isanor Giduquio- Larona
Submitted by:
Jean Bulac Marcos
Court Visit
Date of court visit: February 10, 2014
Courtroom visited: Room
Judge: Wilfredo A. Dagatan
On Monday the 10th of February 2014, we, the Political Science 6 students attended a court hearing at Mandaue Palace of Justice at court _ which had a four hearings on the same day. The said hearing started at 9 in the morning, yet some of the people who were engaged in the cases were not yet there. Most of the work was in matters for mention. There were only four matters scheduled for hearing during the day, whereas I witnessed it with a confusions in my mind about the way they did the hearing. Hence there was an emphasis on matters for mention. Mandaue Palace of Justice has a system whereby they allocate different types of cases for different days.
The first hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 41653 for Violation of Section 1 of Article VI. People of the Philippines vs. Mario T. Dizon. The second hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 41328 for Falsification of Pri. Doc. People of the Philippines vs. Christina H. Alferez. The third hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 40663-9 for Violation of BP. BLG. 22 and the Criminal Case No/s. 40670-80 for Violation of BP. BLG. 22. People of the Philippines vs. Venerando C. Olandria. The last hearing was on the Criminal Case No/s. 38544 and Criminal case No/s. 36653-57 for Violation of BP. BLG. 22. People of the Philippines vs. Lady Ann Y. Domino. All the said hearings was rescheduled by the Judge for some matters.