Preview

Court Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Case Study
SORIANO VS. ABALOS

Facts:
The object of the dispute in this case is a parcel of land originally owned by Adriano Soriano who died intestate in 1947.
Heirs of Adriano Soriano leased the property to spouses David de Vera and Consuelo Villasista on June 30, 1967, for a period of fifteen (15) years beginning July 1, 1967.
On the contract of lease, paragraph 5, provided that Roman Soriano, one of the children of the late Adriano, will be the caretaker of the property during the period of the lease.
During the effectivity of the lease contract, the heirs of Adriano Soriano entered into an extrajudicial settlement of his estate. On January 11, 1968, the property was divided into two (2) lots, Lot No. 60052 and Lot No. 8459.
The Lot No. 60052 (Lot 1) was assigned to Lourdes, Candido and the heirs of Dionisia while the Lot No. 8459 (Lot 2) was assigned to Francisco, Librada, Elcocadio and Roman.
The new owners of Lot No. 60052 sold the portions assigned to them to spouses Braulio and Aquilina Abalos. As well as, the new owners of Lot 8459, except Roman, sold their shares to the Abalos spouses.
On March 14, 1968, the de Vera spouses ousted Roman as caretaker and appointed Isidro Versoza and Vidal Versoza as his substitutes. Thereafter, Roman filed a case for reinstatement and reliquidation against the de Vera spouses.
On September 30, 1969, the Agrarian Court rendered a decision authorizing the ejectment of Roman. On appeal, the decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals. However, before it was executed, the parties entered into a post-decisional agreement wherein the de Vera spouses allowed Roman Soriano to sub-lease the property until the termination of the original lease on June 30 1982. This agreement was approved by the CAR court in an order dated December 22, 1972.
On August 16, 1976, the Abalos spouses filed with the then Court of First Instance of Pangasinan at Lingayen an application for registration of title. The application claimed ownership of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The fight was never held. Oklahoma has a long-arm statute. Magna Verde was served by mail and made a special appearance in Oklahoma state court to argue that Oklahoma does not have personal jurisdiction over it. The main argument is that does Oklahoma have jurisdiction over Magna Verde Corporation?…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When property was purchase by Joseph and Hellen Naab, there was a house and a small concrete garage. Evidence showed that garage was constructed 20 years prior to the Naab?s purchased of the property. Neighbors (The Nolands) had their property surveyed, and requested that the Naabs?s remove the garage since it encroached 0.91 feet over the property line.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    82 Restaurant History

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How was it that a property was only owned for an average of four years before purchased by someone else? Maybe because the life span was shorter in the 17th century or perhaps because those who purchased the property resided elsewhere and thought that they no longer needed the property at 82 Queen Street. This is most likely the reason for the estimated 32 times the ownership of the property traded hands. All of who will not be mentioned, but those that are seemed to have more importance in the history of the property. Keep in mind that the property lot sizes kept decreasing due to specific reasons, one including the cost of the debt and legacies of Elliott.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin purchased the mountain property 31 years ago as joint tenants with a right of survivorship with his friends Peter, John, and Thomas. All of the friends ha= passed away, and Martin has not been back to the property in more than 20 years.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    and a recreation hall with 76 acres of land for $38,000. The property was between the Redlands,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    quitclaim deed

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, Executed this __7__ day of ____February______________, 20_14___, by first party_____Barry____________________________________________ whose post office address is____12 Maple Lane Hypoville New Tudor 66666_______________________________________ to second party,_______Lucy for life as a life estate and then the remainder to his children, Arthur, Brenda and Carrie______________________________________________ whose post office address is_____12 Maple Lane Hypoville New Tudor 66666______________________________________.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dowsett Case Analysis

    • 30784 Words
    • 124 Pages

    was proved as claimed in the declaration, and is not denied by defendants, that this lot of land is a part of the land of Kaakaukukui, granted to Victoria Kamamalu by Royal Patent number 4483. It was also proved, and it is not disputed by defendants, that the paper title to the land sued for is in the plaintiffs by descent from Victoria Kamamalu, to her father, M. Kekuanaoa, thence to his children, Kamehameha V. and Ruth Keelikolani, and by the death of Kamehameha V. it all passed to Ruth Keelikolani and from her by descent and devise to Mrs. B. P. Bishop, whose trustees…

    • 30784 Words
    • 124 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Borders Hotel Corp. Case

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Land of the hotel close to Huron Motor Courts , which Daniels owned was appraised at $975,000.Under the purchase agreement , BHC contracted to give Daniels 97,500 shares of common stock for this land…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forever

    • 562 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Land: On February 15, a condemnation award was received as consideration for unimproved land held primarily as an investment, and on March 31, another parcel of unimproved land to be held as an investment was purchased at a cost of P35,000.…

    • 562 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DMCI, a wholly owned subsidiary, is engaged in general construction services – the Company’s core business. It is also engaged in various construction component businesses such as production and trading of concrete products, and electrical and foundation works. It is one of the Philippines’ leading construction companies.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DEED OF ABSOLUTE SALE

    • 7259 Words
    • 30 Pages

    This Deed is made and executed in the city of Bacoor _ on this day 2014,…

    • 7259 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yong Joo Lin

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. In 1936, defendant, Fung Poi Fong bought the said adjoining land and building, No. 21 Cross Street.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Don Manuel Villa, father of Carmen; husband of Mrs. Villa; a rich and influential man…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES TITLE V. — PRESCRIPTION Chapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1106. By prescription, one acquires ownership and other real rights through the lapse of time in the manner and under the conditions laid down by law. In the same way, rights and actions are lost by prescription. COMMENT: (1) Definition of Prescription…

    • 60560 Words
    • 243 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics