Preview

Corrupt Nature of the Founding Fathers

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corrupt Nature of the Founding Fathers
It was John Adams who noted that "men in general, in every society, who are wholly destitute of property, are also little too acquainted with public affairs for a right judgment, and too dependent upon other men to have a will of their own."1 This shared attitude guided the Founding Fathers in their establishment of what has become America's modern day political system. When today's modern day student is asked just what sort of system that was, it seems the answer is always "democracy." In reality, the House of Representatives is the nearest idea in accordance with a system of democracy that this country would ever reach.2 Washington, Adams, and Jefferson were the wealth and success of their time, and coincidentally, it was these same men that fashioned a structure in which wealth and success were the ultimate judges of where power was to fall. The Founding Fathers did not seek democratic reform, but rather sought personal gain in the form of ultimate power. The Founding Fathers did not seek democratic form partially due to a fear of democracy. It was their belief that "democracy, unchecked rule by the masses, is sure to bring arbitrary redistribution of property, destroying the very essence of liberty."3 Jefferson especially feared the label of "democrat," and it can be seen in American books of the time that "democrat" was a "swear-word, by which persons were designated against their will, usually falsely, like persons falsely called communists today."4 Ideas of democracy are most like to occur among the "oppressed and discontented, disinherited aristocracy, and the rising middle class."5 Democracy does not appeal to a privileged class whose privileges are ever increasing.6 On the subject of power, Adams stated that it "naturally grows...because human passion are insatiable. But that power alone can grow which already is too great; that which is unchecked; that which has no equal power to control it."7 Without a government of the people yet


Bibliography: Koch, Adrienne. Power, Morals, and the Founding Fathers: Essays in the Interpretation of the American Enlightenment. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1961. Hofstadter, Richard. The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948. Maier, Pauline. American Scripture and the Making of the Declaration of Independence. New York: Vintage Books, 1997. Palmer, Robert Roswell. The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University, 1964. Vidal, Gore. Inventing a Nation: Washington, Adams, and Jefferson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Both Jacksonian economic policy and westward movement in America were indicative of the development of democracy between 1820 and 1840. It was in this antebellum era that the United States, with economic and sectional changes, made effects to comply democratic politics and make changes should the country’s founding philosophy be led astray.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author wrote the book from a more social point of view, focusing on the relationships between the founding fathers and how these relationships affected the forming of our nation. Ellis is sympathetic for how Burr and Adams are often victims of the political maneuvering and gamesmanship done by Hamilton and Jefferson. Ellis used letters from letters between Jefferson and Adams, historic books, letters between the founding fathers, newspaper articles, and historical documents to base his argument; his sources are not one sided and show multiple…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is the power or rule of the people. The people have the right to vote the best candidate who is deemed the best fit to govern the government. Both democratic president’s Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson contributed their views of policies and ideas of significant importance to the United States Democracy. As both men were the few first leaders of the development of the beginning of the strong and challenging nation of democracy, they can be compared. The development of democracy from the time President Jefferson to President Jackson was based on the difference between the two leaders which caused changes that were significate to the development of the American republic.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dahl examines the constitution from an historical perspective and draws on modern examples to illustrate that it is, in fact not as democratic as it could be. Even though he holds the Framers in a positive light, Dahl deduces that they were ill experienced to truly deliver a democratic constitution since they had no real models from history to consult and emulate. He furthers examines the possibilities of a changing the constitution, one that would better serve the people even though he realises that three to four structures will not change in the foreseeable future. To which Dahl suggests are Federalism, Presidentialism, Inequality in representation and the Electoral College. P’s.143-145…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mills reviews the structure of power in American society. Power is defined by the ability to make or not make decisions…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern American public often views the Founding Fathers of the United States as level-headed, well-intentioned, diplomatic, successful statesmen. Upon further investigation and analysis, a clear discordance in the men’s visions of the American Spirit shows its face. Some founders strived for a strong centralized federal government while others desired a union of essentially independent states. This dichotomy reveals the schism of understanding amongst the “Founding Brothers” as illuminated in the historical analysis by Joseph Ellis.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founders believed, people can be swayed by emotion, selfish impulses, and corrupt leaders to do terrible things to one another. The Founders also worried that a democracy would become just another version of…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Were the founding fathers democratic reformers? In reference to John P. Roche’s “The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action,” the founding fathers were nothing other than doing what was best for the people and the country. Thus, making them democratic reformers. On an apposing side, Howard Zinn’s written document “A People’s History of the United States,” proclaims that the founding fathers were rich slave owners who were in favor of protecting the property and rights of the rich by designing a strong central government to do so.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial America’s democracy was a work in progress with democratic and undemocratic features. With features like Individual and Human Rights, Equality, and Limited Government, colonial America was continuously finding new ways to govern a new society. While, some of their strategies were undemocratic and cruel, they realized and fixed it with democratic solutions. Their efforts were enormous, and created the free land of colonial America.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon the founding of America, a great deal of pressure was placed onto the Founding Fathers to create a system in which the central government will not acquire too much power and the citizens will be well represented. A representative democracy was, overall, a more effective answer to the question of how to govern the new country rather than a direct democracy after seeing the effects that the Articles of Confederation created when too much of the power of the government was given to the people and their states. A stronger central government was needed without taking away the voice of the people, and that’s what was decided on. However, even though this way has proven to be the most effective way to govern a country, it has its flaws within the system. Corruption finds its way through the system in ways of interest groups and political parties. This system is not immune to factions nor the effect of those factions, and those effects often make their way to important matters within the government.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present political spectrum, democracy is essentially understood as both the most humane and effective means by which to govern a body politic. While democracy is currently relatively non-controversial, this was not the case during its establishment. The democratic experiment in America was viewed somewhat indifferently by many of the world's prominent political philosophers. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill existed among those most apprehensive of the democratic experiment. To each of these men, democracy certainly possessed certain positive attributes, but at the same time, represented a potential threat to the individual freedoms of man, through a much feared 'tyranny of the majority'.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon the opening words of the Constitution, "We the People…do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America," one must ask, who are these people? While the American Constitution provided its citizens with individual rights, many members were excluded. Elite framers manipulated the idea of a constitution in order to protect their economic interests and the interests of their fellow ‘white land and slave owning men ' by restricting the voices of women, slaves, indentured servants and others. Therefore, the Constitution cannot truly be considered a "democratic document." However, because it is a live document, malleable and controllably changeable according to the interest of congress, it has enabled us to make reforms overtime. Such reforms that have greatly impacted America, making us the free, independent nation that we are today.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Founding Fathers wanted to distinguish the newly formed United States from a pure democracy. The Framers defined democracy as government decisions made directly by the people. They decided to use a republic form of government because it promised wiser government. This type of government would allow decisions to be made by representatives elected by people.…

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thus, the founding fathers worked together and compromised to create a “…governing system designed to prevent any set of individuals, any political majority, or even the government itself from becoming too powerful” (Geer, Schiller, & Segal, 2012, p. 9). This was accomplished through the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the limiting of powers. The founding fathers did not come up with this system overnight or simply throw it together. It was so important to them that they spent months working together and trying to think of everything. They wanted to establish a system that would last for generations to come and protect the rights and interests of all people from factions and unjustness.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were fearful of democracy. James Madison worried that factions would develop and violate the rights of other citizens or bring harm to the country. Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers”, the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications,” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by the men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays