Preview

James Hardie Group: Corporation Rules and Regulations

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
James Hardie Group: Corporation Rules and Regulations
Introduction:
James Hardie group is one of the Australia largest asbestos manufacturers. The group had been liable for 70% of Australian asbestos consumption. However, in February 2007, ASIC had started to impose civil proceedings against James Hardie, the directors and the officers, as ASIC alleged that JHIL and both executive and non-executive had breached their statutory duty. This short research report had outlined the role of ASIC and various penalty that ASIC can impose under Corporation Act 2001. Besides that, we will also discuss the position that ASIC had held from 2004 until current date in relation to the directors of Hardie group. At last, I had provided a summary of the ASIC’s media release that had been established on 13 May 2011, and indentified the element that ASIC is hoping the High Court to uphold.

The Role of ASIC:
The Australian Security and Investment Commission (ASIC) is a commonwealth statutory corporation that set up by Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act, and it is a regulator which in charge of monitoring the Australia’s Corporation, products, markets and financial services (Lipton, Herzberg and Welsh 2012, p. 736).
On the other hand, ASIC is also a commonwealth authority that is responsible for governing the Corporation Act. ASIC Act provided that ASIC owned such powers and function that endowed by the corporation legislation to ASIC. Thus, what exactly is the corporation legislation means? Under Section 5(1), they had interpreted the term ‘corporation legislation’ to mean the ASIC Act and the Corporation Act (Baxt, Finnane and Harris 2012). Besides that, ASIC also owned the power to initiate prosecution for criminal offences or apply for civil penalty orders if they believed that there’s a contravention of the law. ASIC is also able to ban a director from managing a company for a certain period if they contravened their general duties. For instance, in the case of ASIC v Stephen William Vizard [2005], the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cadia Case Analysis

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Cadia Holdings Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (2010) 242 CLR 195…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE NOTE

    • 2311 Words
    • 8 Pages

    GK v Dovedeen Pty Ltd & Anor (No 3) [2011] QCAT 509 (25 October 2011)…

    • 2311 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Memorandum and Objective: The purpose of the memorandum is to provide a detailed review and analysis of the legal situation considering “Paslay, Bryan & Brooks, Barristers & Solicitors**” and…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    On 1 April1987, six exchanges that operated in the state capital cities merged to form the ASX. It is an Australia's primary national market for equities, derivatives, and securities. In Nov.1998, the ASX became the first exchange in the world to have its shares listed on its own market. On 1 August 2010, the responsibility for the supervision of real-time trading on the ASX was transferred to ASIC. The ASIC which is an independent commonwealth government body become the Australia’s corporate, market and financial service regulator. From then on, trading on the ASX is regulated and supervised mainly by ASIC and ASX. In this report, we are going to look in detail at the role played by the ASX and ASIC in the regulation and supervision of trading on the ASX. Moreover, a wide range of sources are used in this report. Some information are obtained from the textbook, official website of the ASX and ASIC, as well as several journal articles. Topics covered in this report are the importance of the ASX as a regulator, the responsibility and objective of the ASX and ASIC, roles played by the ASX and ASIC, and the supervision transferred.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernard Banton's Case

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Originally, Banton’s case was heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court and in 1989, the case was moved to the Dust Diseases Tribunal as this was a more appropriate way of dealing with his case. After Banton was diagnosed with asbestosis, he never gave up on himself as he continued to continuously campaign and bring attention and awareness to the general public about asbestos related diseases. The issues that had arrised in the Banton case was that his boss James Hardie owed not only Banton but his other employees a duty of care. Hardie knew about the dangers of asbestos and let his employees work at his company without access to any protective clothing while on the job and did nothing about this incident. Bantons whole view on this event that occurred in his life was that something needed to be done about this so he took James Hardie to court to fight for his…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Asic

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4 HIHC made an undocumented $10 million payment to a company controlled by Adler, PEE. Around the time of the payment, PEE became a trustee of a unit trust controlled by the Adler Corporation and two others. Units in the Trust were issued to HIHC at a price of $10 million. Adler Corporation had an existing entitlement to 10% of the Trust’s distributable income, while HIHC acquired a 90% entitlement. The $10 million payment was made in a way to ensure it would not come to the attention of the directors of HIH, apart from Adler, Williams and to a lesser degree Fodera. Using the $10 million payment shares in HIH were then purchased over two weeks. The stock market was given the impression that the purchase of shares were made by Adler or family interests associated with Adler. A further part of the $10 million payment was used to purchase various venture capital unlisted investments from Adler Corporation at cost. It was contended that Mr Adler breached his duties as a director or officer of HIH or HIHC under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act). ASIC sought declarations that various alleged contraventions of the Act had been committed by the three personal defendants. Mr Adler was a non-executive director of HIH. Mr Adler was sued as a non-executive director of HIH and as an alleged officer (non-executive) of its wholly owned subsidiary HIHC. Mr Adler denied he was a director or officer of HIHC. ASIC relied on evidence that as a director of HIH, HIHC’s holding company, Mr Adler was a person who ‘participated in the making of decisions that affected the whole or a substantial party of the business of HIHC’. ASIC also stated that Mr Adler’s participation in investment decisions fell within the category of decisions…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Unit 1 Business Environment D1 I have been asked to write a report evaluating the influence of the different stakeholders exert in organisation. As the reason for this I have chosen Asda as my organisation.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Upon further analysis of the case study of ABC Chemicals and their associated business and activities it has become apparent that there are a number of hazards and risks that can be identified and need to be assessed and either eliminated or controlled using various legislative measures and codes of practice relevant to their industry type as they have to maintain compliance.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Manslaughter

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Corporate Manslaughter Act now makes it easier to initiate a prosecution against organisations – particularly large and more complex ones – because it focuses on the aggregated failures of senior management rather than attempting to prove an individual’s guilt (the ‘directing mind’ under the old law). Essentially, the Act codifies the existing common law test for gross negligence manslaughter, but directs it solely at organisations.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coal Mining Act

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, this act suffered from critical disparities that made it difficult for all coal miners who were faced with black lung disease. The act only briefly mentions that examinations should be kept uniform “to the greatest degree possible.” 3 This creates a large disparity in the execution of the examination policy, as the act does not specifically state how the exams should be treated, and what actually counts as developing black lung. There have been numerous cases where miners have felt that they were unfairly treated under this act. In these instances, miners have been told that their disease was not “good enough” to receive compensation, but under whose terms? The act does not clearly state what classifies pneumoconiosis as onset, as there are many stages to developing the full, complicated…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon showed that “In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clark, the court considered the meaning of the words “some other good reason”. The court said “ a core, irreducible requirement of involvement in the management of the company” and “every director is expected to participate in the management of company.” (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2014).…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Sprod bnf v Public Relations Oriented Security Pty Limited , the court was concerning about whether the Security company was vicariously liable for the violent conduct of its employees. The case analysis is to examine the approach to the decision of the court and indicate further developments as well as commercial implications.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    set up under and administer the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act (ASIC Act), and it carries out most of its work under the Corporations Act…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Business conditions and regulatory initiatives have resulted in a variety of codes and regulations to meet the needs of local capital markets[i]. For instance, in the United States, several major corporate and accounting scandals such as those perpetrated by Enron, WorldCom, Tyco International, and Adelphia communications resulted in the enactment of laws and rules to restore and maintain confidence in the financial markets. Other nations experienced similar situations and enacted rules and regulations to promote consumers and investors’ confidence in the financial market. This paper examined the major events that led to the enactment of corporate governance regulations in Australia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom (UK). And analyzed the similarities and differences among the regulations, and opined on the most comprehensive regulation.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case Study

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Duties under section 180(1) of the Act attach not only to directors but to officers more broadly (directors, company secretaries and certain others). The NSW Court of Appeal found that Mr Shafron was an officer on two distinct bases. Firstly, because Mr Shafron was the company secretary of James Hardie Industries Ltd (JHIL), and secondly, because Mr Shafron was a person who makes, or participates in making decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the business of the corporation.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays