Preview

Corliss V Bowers 281 Us 376

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1350 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corliss V Bowers 281 Us 376
c. Cafeteria Plan
Web-Master Inc. should adopt a cafeteria plan because it will provide employees with option to receive only those benefits they desire. Cafeteria plans are an employer provided benefit that allows each employee to select the benefits that he or she would like to receive from a range of benefits within the plan. This program will provide an employee only with those benefits that he or she may want or need and the ability to receive cash if they choose to not utilize the various benefits. The employee will then pay for these benefits, including the cash option, on a pre-tax basis through a salary reduction agreement, reducing their gross income from income tax purposes.
i. Taxation of Cafeteria Plans
The doctrine of constructive receipt requires taxpayers to pay taxes on income that is “available” to them, whether or not they take actual possession of the income. Corliss v Bowers, 281 US 376 (1930); Treas. Reg. § 1.451-2(a). Under this rule, any plan that provides the employees of a company a choice between taxable or nontaxable benefits must be included in the income of the employee. The cafeteria plan rules of the Code provide a safe harbor from these rules.
Under the cafeteria plan rules, found in section 125, employees are allowed to be participants in a plan that allows
…show more content…
I.R.C. § 125(d)(1). The required information includes the following: specific description of benefits available, eligibility rules, procedures governing participant selections under plan, the manner in which employer contributions may be made, the maximum amount of compensation that may be contributed under the plan, and the plan year on which the plan operates. Prop. Treas. Reg. § 1.125-1(c). The cafeteria plan can reference other documents which contain specific plan benefits, instead of including a description of the benefits in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    chapter 5 solutions

    • 877 Words
    • 6 Pages

    5–5A.(a)Yes. Donner Company meets the test of having paid wages totaling more than $1,500 during any calendar quarter of the current year.…

    • 877 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    on the food service available to retirees. Retirees traveling on a service charge pass are…

    • 15284 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 7th, W. Otis Higgs, Jr. of the Peete, Higgs, and Armstrong law firm on behalf of the South Side Church of God in Christ responded to the allegations made by the South Memphis District Alliance of Neighborhood Associations . The Church outlined its binding covenants from Union Planters and provided evidence of its progress towards build a community center containing a gymnasium, kitchen, shelter, and educational facilities. The court again agreed with the plaintiffs at the August 18th hearing. With the reprieve the group sought a way to acquire and preserve the Stax legacy and building. However, they found a populace and city not yet ready to come to grips with its truly unique place as the result of African American and musical…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Cain met employee Oliver Dean Emigh (“Emigh”) and owner John Roberts at the Bargain Barn in March of 1998. John Cain (“Cain”) was a self-employed computer consultant. John Roberts (“Roberts”) explained to Cain that he needed documents typed for Republic of Texas (“ROT”) legal matters due to being a member of the ROT. Cain met with Johnie Wise and Roberts the next day at the Bargain Barn to discuss computer related topics. Cain became worried about Roberts, ROT affiliation when he went to work for Roberts on a daily basis. Cain told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about Roberts’ request for secretarial assistance on ROT matters on March 10, 1998. The FBI confirmed Cain’s story by the information that they received through their investigation. Cain said he would contact FBI Agent David Church (“Agent Church”) with any additional information that he gathered. Cain informed Agent Church that Robert’s was asking him to run checks for outstanding warrants against ROT members at which time he advised him that running warrant checks was illegal. Agent Church told Cain that he should inform Roberts that it was illegal. Cain attended a ROT meeting after Agent Church told him to attend the meeting if he wanted. Jack Abbott Grebe Jr. (“Grebe”) visited Cain on a regular basis to make photocopies. Wise started coming with Grebe on these visits to Cain’s residence. Cain contacted Agent Church on March 24, 1998 to discuss talks of obtaining information on explosives from the internet. Cain mentioned that he felt that Roberts was trying to recruit him as a ROT member during the meeting. Cain informed Agent Church on April 29, 1998 that Wise and Grebe asked him to find e-mail addresses of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Drug Task Force (DEA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, White House, United States Attorney General, Texas Attorney General, and Texas…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    D.The case deals with the city Council of Richmond passing a law that made is so companies that had construction contracts with the city had to subcontract at least 30 percent of their business to a business that has minority ownership. This lead to the J.A. Croson Company losing a contract because the company does not have a minority owner. This lead to the company starting a suit against Richmond.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. A business fails to meet the criteria if its practices are not equal and if has procedures unrelated to necessary job functions in the organization. In the case of McDonnell Douglas vs Green the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing a failure in the organizational business process. In this case the hiring and firing of an employee, McDonnell Douglas was taken to court over their unethical tactics. The charging party has to only prove four things: they are a minority (protected group), they applied and were qualified for the position, the job was not offered to them, and the employer continued to seek applicants with similar qualifications. If the plaintiff can prove these four elements, the employer must show a legitimate lawful reason why the person was not hired.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally as a Supreme Court judge and after taking a fairly through look at the cases, I’d have to rule in favor of Frederick. While the banner that Mr. Frederick had up during the school event does make a reference to drugs, the message is pretty vague as even I can’t really interpret the true absolute definition of the banner. Judge Steven even states “Justice John Paul Stevens took the position that the school 's interest in protecting students from speech that can be reasonably regarded as promoting drug use does not justify Frederick 's punishment for his attempt to make an ambiguous statement simply because it refers to drugs.” ( n/a, 2012). Another important reason why I am following this ruling is because while yes Mr. Frederick had a 14 foot banner held high it didn’t exactly disrupt the school event itself and it was the principals own interpretation of the message that caused a disruption that escalated into Frederick’s unjustified punishment. This statement from the ACLU even states that Fredericks actions were done off school campus, “As the ACLU and Mertz noted, the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at the Olympic Torch Relay - a public event on public streets - and Frederick had not yet arrived at school for the day.” (N/a, 2007 ). Just by this alone I believe that the principal had no justification in asking to take the banner down because of the cryptic message let alone punish Mr. Frederick just because of her own intrepertation.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    NO. - An ER/EE relationship requires "control over the person to the extent of prescribing the manner in which the work shall be executed and the method and details by which the desired result is to be accomplished."…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bowers V Hardwick

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case, Bowers v. Hardwick, originated when Michael Hardwick was targeted by a policer officer for harassment in Georgia. A houseguest of Hardwick's let the officer into his home, where Hardwick was found engaging in oral sex with his partner, who was another male. Michael Hardwick was arrested and charged of sodomy. After charges were later dropped, Hardwick brought his case to the Supreme Court to have the sodomy law declared unconstitutional.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Living in Divergent

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    help our citizens each have a healthy meal approved to better each family in a…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Cutting Cafeteria Costs A cafeteria at All-­‐State University has one special dish it serves like clockwork every Thursday at noon. This supposedly tasty dish is a casserole that contains sautéed onions, boiled sliced potatoes, green beans, and cream of mushroom soup. Unfortunately, students fail to see the special quality of this dish, and they loathingly refer to it as the Killer Casserole. The students reluctantly eat the casserole, however, because the cafeteria provides only a limited selection of dishes for Thursday's lunch (namely, the casserole).…

    • 1087 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some complexes include all meals in the levy. In others, a percentage of the meals per month are included (e.g. ten lunches and ten dinners). At others, all meals are optional, so you are able to purchase subsidised meals as and when required.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Needs to Know

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first thing parents need to know about what the new program is and how to qualify for the program. This type of program is a National program provided by federal government. According to the fact sheet on the National school lunch program, this program is federally assisted meal program the is operated in over 100,000 public and non-profit private schools. Also, this program is down at residential child care institutions as well (National School Lunch Program Fact Sheet). This program will be available to all grade levels from Kindergarten through the twelve grade. Every elementary, middle and high schools will have the same lunches throughout the school district. However, before any student within the district can be part of this program, they must qualify first. To qualify for the program, the parent must filled out a form for each child. For an example, if a parent has 2 kids in the same school or 2 kids in different school within the district, they must fill out a form for each child.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fresh 20 Case Study

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    through the corner “ Free Sample Meal Plan“ to get a free meal plan to get more…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics