However the University and the NCAA were given a lawsuit by the Standing Rock & Spirit Tribes. They feel as the mascot and nickname the Fight Sioux is racists and stereotypical to their people. However the school fells as if having the name of the Fighting Sioux should be seen as a great honor, especially because of all the recognition, and the recognition is always positive, the only negative is those of critics but still the lawsuit stands. The university feels as if the lawsuit is lost on their side it will devastate the school because it has such a powerful meaning to the students and they believe that the name hypes the way the athletes play because they want to keep their…
In the blog Not for Sport by Barbara Munson, the argument is presented that teams should not use “Indian” mascots. Using a statement and response dialogue Munson argues against what she feels are “common misunderstandings on this issue” (Munson 1). Munson uses ethos, pathos and logos with weak results. Munson’s target audience are the general population and more specifically communities with current “Indian” mascots and leaders in those communities.…
Initially, all actions that are made should be made with the best outcome, not demonstrated in trying to ban all mascots for teams and schools. In the cartoon “ Mascots” Phil Hands informs caucasians that mascots for teams and schools is wrong because we disrespect the culture and the Native Americans. The author refuses to take action. By making a school bill board discriminating Americans, Hands states, “It’s not meant to be offensive”. The author is representing how they feel towards caucasians. The action of the cartoon is virtue ethic, even though we use mascots for teams and schools we don’t disrespect Native Americans or their heritage. A school or team can use a Native American mascot as long as we don't disrespect them or their heritage.…
Shakley used the American government and white settlers during the nineteenth-century as an example of how Natives were being treated. If the American culture is treating Native Americans as prey then they are taking advantage of them, which is not fair. The text speaks on stereotypes made about American Natives because of their mascot. The text says, “The University of Illinois Fighting Illini, for example, refers to an Indian nation, but now that its Chief Illiniwek mascot been abandoned few people make the connection” (Shackley 521). Of the many schools and mascots the Native tribe mascots were the only ones…
In the summer of 2005, the NCAA banned the use of mascots that could be considered offensive to American Indians at any of their championship games. In order to understand this, it is important to consider that movies and television programs for years portrayed them as savage warriors that were feared and misunderstood. That is why some schools have chosen to use Indians as their mascot, a role typically played by wild animals or fictional beasts. You would not tolerate derogatory terms for other ethnic groups being used for school mascots. In the NCAA’s new ruling, they ask schools to eliminate mascots that may be hurtful or offensive to America’s Indian…
“The Redskins”, “The Blackhawks”, “The Cleveland Indians”, and other sport teams/organizations have very offensive derogatory mascots and slurs towards Native Americans. Many Native Americans are very offended by these sports team using their culture in a very racists way. They argue that Native Americans are people not mascots, and they also portray their body features very “savagely”. The redskin, feather in the hair, old wrinkled skin, war paint, etc. all these features are stereotypes and disrespectful.…
The exploitation of racially and culturally offensive nicknames, mascots, and images in sports has been a topic of debate in the US and Canada over the last half-century. The controversy occurs at all levels ranging from elementary schools to professional teams. This has resulted in many teams changing either their team name, team image, or team mascot associated with their sports teams. The most well known professional teams that are not supported by their respective tribes are the Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians, Washington Redskins, and the Chicago Blackhawks. The Cleveland Indians “Chief Wahoo” might have been the most insulting and offensive logo, which depicts an extremely stereotypical image of an American Indian with a red face, big smile, and a feather sticking out of his hair. Although this image has long since been removed and replaced with a harmless capital letter “C”, the irreversible damage to the reputation and culture of the Native American people has been done. The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) feels that the mascots of these teams portray negative stereotypes of Native American people and demean their native traditions and rituals.…
The use of Indian culture by non-Indians as mascots, logos, and nicknames has been a constant fight for years. Schools have been using names of tribes with aggressive, stoic histories for their sports teams. But the Native Americans look at that and feel discriminated against, because of the negative stereotype given by that type of label.…
Using Native American team nicknames and images as mascots in sports has been a topic of controversy in the United States and Canada since the 1960s, as part of the movement for Native American civil rights.Most people say that they are meant to be respectful, to Native American people. Many have made the argument that Native American mascots focus on bravery, courage and fighting skills rather than anything derogatory.…
Issue of whether to keep Mascots in schools or not, started in late 1970's and from then this debate is going on. Most of the schools have Indian Mascots in place for half a century and suddenly it become problem to use Indian Mascots. Over 500 Native American organizations also announced their support for the removal of those mascots and over 1200 schools across the United States have changed the name of their sports teams and some school refused to play with those schools using Indian mascots. But some school still think that using mascots are just paying homage to the Native peoples and it's just another group claiming to be offended. Sports teams used those mascots to promote their team's athletic powers, like wolf, lion and eagle etc. How portrait of an Indain wearing hat with feather or headdress can be offensive or racist? One thing which never be done up to now that is to view our history from Native eyes. First of all, learn about their culture and their living style from their new perspective not the one which is given in our history books. From last hundred years we taught our generations that this is our country and we had a very long war with Indians which won. We also tell different kind of stories like burning of Fort Pequot Indians because they had trade relationship with British company. Can stories like this possibly be related to mascot issue? Using mascots are really a problem or just a political incorrectness.…
We all know that racism still exists in today's society, despite our best efforts to believe otherwise. This is evident in the stereotyping of Native Americans. Florida State University is home of the Seminoles. Their mascot, and school for that matter, help perpetuate these stereotypes by using drum beating, war-whooping and symbolic scalping as part of the celebration rituals displayed by the mascot at halftime and on the sidelines. The band also partakes in this during the game. The "Indians" being portrayed here exist on in the imagination and in Hollywood. Nothing about it is historically…
These mascots also help spread and continue stereotypes because “most Americans have no direct or personal experience with contemporary American Indians” (463). The mascots and inaccurate depictions of American Indians are not only harming the psychological well-being of the minority by making it difficult for them to form an individual identity as well as a group identity, but are also keeping the majority from forming well-educated opinions and attitudes towards them. All parties involved are harmed because it further separates them and keeps them from being able to coexist and work together on issues that affect them all. If the minority was not misrepresented and their real issues were not ignored, then the properly educated majority could help raise a voice for their rights (as the voice of the majority is listened to more than the voice of the minority, which is wrong). By allowing these mascots to continue “representing” and “honoring” American Indians, then the stereotypes are also being allowed to continue, and the majority is continuously…
The Indians were here before the name American even existed. In Luther Standing Bear’s essay “what the Indian means to America”, he informed us of how great the American Indian is. While many scholars would debate on the true heritage of America’s beginning, The Indian would not join this argument because they alone know the real story of this country we call home. Within this essay the Indians are a breed of people that do not lie down easily. Many would strongly agree with Luther Standing Bear’s definition that the Indian is a true American. The Indians are the roots under America soil because of their strong connection with nature, their spiritual toughness, and their musical influence.…
people? Should the Native American people be proud that a school uses an icon as a mascot?…
The Our Live exhibit represents contemporary life and identities of American Indians. According to the website of National Museum of the American Indian, “The main section of Our Lives centers on various layers of identity. For Native people, identity--who you are, how you dress, what you think, where you fit in, and how you see yourself in the world--has been shaped by language, place, community membership, social and political consciousness, and customs and beliefs. But Native identity has also been influenced by a legacy of legal policies that have sought to determine who is Indian and who is not. The issue of Native identity continues to resonate today, as Native people across the Americas seek to claim the future on their own terms.” In other words, a significant number of Native Americans attempt to remain their identities; their languages, tradition, culture and custom although the English language, new culture and modern life style of modern Americans influence over their lives. As a result, all of the items that are shown in this exhibit express the view of American Indians about protecting or continuing…