Preview

Controversial Argument Against Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Controversial Argument Against Euthanasia
The human race has the right to be free and to live their life as they wish. Men and women should be allowed to make personal decisions in life, including careers or hobbies. But no one talks about the decision of their own death. Terminally-ill patients are suffering by the minute and continue to suffer until they eventually die by a biological failure. Patients should have the right to end their life with a painless lethal drug. Some would want to prevent further suffering from their own physical pain or suffering of loved ones that see the patient decaying everyday. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma.
The controversial topic of euthanasia is highly debated throughout the globe on a variety of different levels. The best …show more content…
When a patient is terminally ill, they become depressed and could potentially make a flawed decision. In some cases, a patient may be unable to express what they want. Living wills are the best solution to this problem. Living wills are documents that arrange the outcome of a patient in an unforeseen event. Should they become unable to communicate with their healthcare providers, a living will carries out their supraliminal decisions. Several States consider living wills or a legal document when regarding conflicts with euthanasia. As The Declaration of Independence states, “ ...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This line can be taken into consideration when discussing the topic of euthanasia stating, mankind has the right to live and be happy. Meanwhile, man should not be forced to live unhappily in a state of suffering. Patients should have the right to die while respecting their competent choices by allowing death with dignity, granting them control over their last moments of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reg Crew Euthanasia
    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reg Crew Euthanasia

    The main argument for euthanasia to be legal is that many people believe that everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die. Many argue that because we can determine the course of our lives by our own free will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course. It then follows that we also have as human beings, the fundamental right to determine how we die. The argument of people who are very anti-euthanasia is that euthanasia is immoral because life must be preserved and protected. For something to be immoral, it would have to violate moral laws or norms. The preservation of life is, however, the decision of the patient who has full control and not the physician.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia Ethical
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Euthanasia Ethical

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the United States, but still considered cruel to some people. Animals that are in agony and need mercy are euthanized. Some think that it's cruel to put animals out of there misery, but some think it's cruel not to. Euthanasia, mercy killing used on animals, is fair to animals in suffer. If a dog got hit by a car and was in great pain, you could either wait until it dies on its own, or euthanize the dog, putting it out of its misery.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 2132 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…

    • 2132 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Argument Against Euthanasia
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Argument Against Euthanasia

    The study of Bioethics involves the consideration of ethical issues arising from advancements in medicine and/or biology. The study of bioethics helps with determining the proper decision in regard to medical or biological issues. Bioethics is highly influential in academia, where scholars investigate the various scenarios arising from advancements, but is also influential in the applied realms of biology and medicine. Albert Jonsen, in his book Bioethics, claims "This field has established itself as an integral part of practical or applied philosophy and as a valuable adjunct to health policy and medical practice" (Jonsen 4). When dealing with the human body, ethics must be considered in order to preserve the value of human life. A highly…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ethical Debate in the Medical World of Euthanasia
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Ethical Debate in the Medical World of Euthanasia

    The medical use of euthanasia has been one the most highly debated topics in healthcare for many years. Should you be able to decide when you want to die? Should physicians help patients who no longer wish to live die? To help gain insight into this highly controversial and fascinating topic, I have chosen an article from Santa Clara University. In this article, the author gave a beautiful example of an acceptable situation in which I believe euthanasia can be used. He explained that his first wife was dying of inoperable bone cancer. She had thrombosis, broken bones, and no longer had any control over her bowels. It was no longer a question of if she was going to die; it was a question of when. She had been suffering for two years and could no longer withstand the pain of her terminal illness. The authors have lobbied for a new law that would allow the use of euthanasia in the treatment of patients suffering from terminal diseases. Under their law, two different physicians would have to both determine that patient is dying from a terminal disease that can not be cured or successfully treated. As stated by one of the authors, Derek Humphry; “It’s me. It’s my body. It’s my liberty. It’s my life. And it’s my death. Let me have control.” If we have given patients the right to refuse feeding tubes and other life saving measures then why should they be stripped of the right to end their unbearable suffering. The biggest principle surround the use of euthanasia is autonomy, the right to self-determination. Some individuals argue that autonomy gives you the freedom to have another person intervene to take your life, while others argue that taking one’s life is a contraindication of autonomy as you are giving away your freedom. There is no doubt that this topic will be debated for many years to come. I personally believe that an individual suffering a terminal disease should be given the right…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Effects of the Death with Dignity Act
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Effects of the Death with Dignity Act

    Euthanasia not only gives the patient the opportunity to stop their suffering, it also gives them autonomy. According to Thomas Preston, professor of medicine, a retired cardiologist and a former board member of Compassion in Dying “society must protect the right of terminally ill patients to choose euthanasia.” (Euthanasia 53) By euthanasia being legal, we have been unconsciously giving the patient the autonomy of whether they want to continue living or not. We as human beings can only perceive the outside of a person, however, we could never really know what they may be going through or suffering. Sometimes, individuals are so self-centered that would prefer to have their loved ones alive and in pain than giving them the freedom to choose between life and death. After all, each person is the owner of his or her life and should be able to decide what is best for them.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Do Terminally Ill Patients Have a Choice in Their Life?
    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Do Terminally Ill Patients Have a Choice in Their Life?

    Gupta, Deepak, Bhatnagar, Sushma, & Mishra,Seema, (2006). Euthanasia: Issues Implied Within. Internet Journal of Pain, System Control & Palliative Care, Vol 4 Issue 2, p 1-1, 1p, 1bw retrieved July 11, 2008 from EBSCO Host database.…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controversial Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page

    Controversial Arguments Against Euthanasia

    If a person is legally allowed to refuse treatment that will effect their life, then why can’t a person who is suffering a great deal of pain share the same faith? Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics today, it is a painless way of killing a patient that is suffering from an incurable and painful disease or if the patient is in an irreversible coma…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Argument Over Euthanasi Good Death
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Argument Over Euthanasi Good Death

    The Argument over Euthanasia I. What is euthanasia? A. ¡§good death¡¨- greek B. intentional termination of life by another by explicit request of person who dies C. euthanasia has many meanings due to moral/ethincal/religious terms-mass confusion II. Different forms of euthanasia A. passive euthanasia- speeding up death of person by withdrawing some form of life support & letting nature take its course 1. remove life support equipment 2. stopping medical procedures, medications, etc. 3. stopping water & food supply 4. not delivering CPR 5. most common- giving morphine to patient to control pain but causing a sooner death (given to people who are terminally ill or in a vegetative state) B. active euthanasia-…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ethics Of Euthanasia Or Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Ethics Of Euthanasia Or Physician Assisted Suicide

    The decision for euthanasia is a pure moral decision; one that brings with it both positive and negative consequences. The main leading argument is that it allows those who will severely suffer to alleviate their pain before they ultimately pass. This assisted death puts less of a strain on medical supplies and allows the patient to die rather than remain in pain. Contrary, some argue that we do not have the humane…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Antigone
    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Antigone

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia and Supreme Court
    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia and Supreme Court

    Euthanasia is a hotly debated topic around the modern world, it raises question of morality, responsibility, religion and role of the scientific community in medicine and the wider world. Who has the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia Pros And Cons
    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia Pros And Cons

    Does the person has a right to die? The pro side feel that the person has the right to exercise their rights. The pro of euthanasia or physician –assisted suicide feel that the person have ,”the right of a competent , terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” (top 10 pros and cons). The story in the top 10 pros and cons, states in their report that, “terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death” (top 10 pros and cons).Does a patient should suffer at the end of life? The pro stated at, “Hemlock Society we get calls daily from desperate people who are looking for someone like Jack Kevorkian to end their life” (). The person might want to end their life because they are suffering and they feel it no quality of life for them. The con states that the Activist claim that laws are against Euthanasia but assisted suicide are government mandated suffering , and they allow this as long it not publicize. The pro of a living will it state what a person wants. Living will cannot be refused and if the patient does not want to prolong their life or care, then that person have a write because it’s written and it is a legal document. The con of the living will is , “ not only are we awash in evidence that the perquisites for a successful living will policy are unachievable, but there is direct evidence that living wills regularly fails to have their intended…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Controversy On Euthanasia
    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Controversy On Euthanasia

    Doctors now have the technology and the skills to anticipate natural death almost indefinitely. A website article states, “In an attempt to provide medical and emotional care, a doctor does and should prescribe medicines that will relieve suffering even if the medications cause side effects. Euthanasia follows the same theory of dealing with suffering in a way to help one die peacefully” (“Pros and Cons”). There is a distinctive difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide. Euthanasia is the ability to die with dignity, while assisted suicide is assisting one to commit suicide. Euthanasia happens when a physician or other healthcare provider does something, such as administering a known lethal dose of a drug with the patient’s consent. Physician-Assisted Suicide is where the terminally ill patient's request a prescription for a fatal dose of a drug which they can administer to themselves at a time of their choosing. Ernst and Mennie had stated in an article that “both euthanasia and assisted suicide force someone else to end your life. The job of the health care professional is to maintain and enhance life, not end it” (Ernst and Mennie). However, when one thinks of the job of the health care professional it is to add quality and meaning to one’s life. In some situations, when there is a terminally ill patient that will never be able to have quality or meaning in their life wouldn’t it be the duty of the physician to suggest euthanasia so one may die with…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More