Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Contributions to Society and It's Effects-Comparing "In Cold Blood" and "My Name Is Asher Lev"

Powerful Essays
1630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contributions to Society and It's Effects-Comparing "In Cold Blood" and "My Name Is Asher Lev"
Contributions to Society and its Effects

Truman Capote’s characters, Perry Smith and Dick Hancock, used in one of his most famous works In Cold Blood, find ways in which their contributions to society, within their personal lives as well as in their surrounding community, leads them to a fatal state of regret, remorse and actuality, all of which were consequences caused by their very own actions and decisions. Chaim Potok, author of My Name is Asher Lev, creates a similar theme of his characters’ ways of contributing to society. Although with a different community and individuality of the characters, both works establish a set of contributions and unexpected reactions of the two communities for each. Truman’s characters, Perry and Dick, provided their contribution to society and a Texas community by murdering the Clutter family. Upon hearing the news of the murder of the “perfect” family, who many would describe as being “‘real fond of Herb and Bonnie [Clutter]… and saw them every Sunday at church, and even if [one] hadn’t known the family, and liked them so well, [they] wouldn’t feel any [less sad]’” (Capote 80), members of the community feel insecure, unprotected and eventually come to the realization of reality that they are in fact not all perfect individuals living in a perfect community. The people in the Clutters’ small Texas community look down upon both Perry and Dick without even knowing that they were the murderers at the time, simply because they committed a crime that caused heartache and sorrow to those who knew the family. Asher Lev – a devout Hasidic, orthodox Jew – was in a similar situation with his own community but did not commit a literal crime, like murder. As devout as he was to his religion, Asher became even more devoted to art and painted his first painting that happened to be a crucifixion, despite the ideology that “observant Jews do paint crucifixions. As a matter of fact, observant Jews do not paint at all – in the way that [he was painting]” (Potok 3). Once exposed to his community, Asher, along with his painting, was criticized with all different reasons; some of which stated that he was going against all of the rules and morals a Jew was expected to possess: devotion to God and religion, respect for one’s parents, oneself, and fellow Jewish community members. Asher tells the reader about his parents, Aryeh, his father, and Rivkeh, his mother, who was most effected and disturbed by their son’s painting and how he was scolded by both about how they do not want him to behave the way “a goy behaves…. The people of the sitra achra behave this way. They are evil and from the Other Side. Jews do not behave this way” (Potok 4). These cold words and feelings towards Asher make him feel neglected and not favored in the community and, to everyone’s dismay, would eventually lead Asher to continue this “disrespectful” artwork because it was the only way in which he was able to express himself. Whether it was the illegal crimes the characters committed or the disappointment of the community regarding an individual’s insolence in connection with their religion, both instances led to a different kind of satisfaction, or happiness. Once Perry and Dick completed the murder, a sense of gratification came over the two due to their accomplishment of getting away with murdering an entire family. Happiness in Asher’s eyes came about in a different, more optimistic, way. Because of the communities’ disapproval of Asher’s paintings and disappointment in him as fellow Jew, Asher developed a way of thought in which helped him disregard almost all aspects of what he was once taught and to focus strictly on art. Jacob Kahn, a talented artist as well as a Ladover Jewish community member, was not only the main influence on Asher’s paintings, but as well as the basis for Asher’s way of thought and his attitude towards those in the community unfavorable of him, including his father. Asher and Kahn were very fond of each other and treated one another with great respect. On several occasions, Jacob Kahn would recommend a certain way, or a given manner, in which Asher should approach situations brought by others to discourage him and his artwork. This approach would be to simply ignore their insulting remarks and to then use his built up energy and express it in his paintings, which is exactly what Asher did in one instance when “all through that day [he] kept hearing [his] father’s words. We must fight against it.” Angered and full of this angry energy, Asher proceeded to go “into [his] room and drew [his] father angry, drew a picture of him in reds and browns, angry and shouting. It was a good picture” (Potok 177). Throughout the book, Dick seemed to bask more in their risky murder escapade than Perry did, who Capote described as someone who had the ability to obtain his moral values during his time spent with Dick, yet finding a way, usually by listening to Dicks ideas, to continuously obliterate his own good conscience in hopes of not feeling guilty and full of regret for committing a murder. It is evident to the reader that Perry is always nervous before he and Dick engage in any illegal actions. These uncertain feelings cause Perry to indulge in a panic, in which he envisions a possible situation, such as one that could involve “Dick in the hands of the law, perhaps arrested while writing a phony check, or for committing a minor traffic violation (and found to be driving a “hot” car)” (Capote 193), which could easily result in the pair’s arrest. On the contrary, it is apparent that throughout Perry and Dick’s mighty “journey” of trying to pass with first-degree murder, not at any time did Dick seem to come in contact with any struggles, which may also led to Dick’s carefree attitude. An attitude in which being carefree not only led to his blunt confession of murdering the Cuttler family, but also that he was carefree of death, which is the punishment both he and Perry received once found guilty. Grief and despair not only occurred within the lives of Dick, Perry and the Clutters’ community, but as well as in Asher Lev’s community, especially with his parents. Because of the fact that Asher expressed himself entirely through his artwork and was not interested with what others’ remarks were because he simply did not care, Asher rarely thought about which of his paintings would one day cause either a small, or large, controversy. This train of thought that came over Asher led to his famous nude paintings. These creations, while engaging, one-of-a-kind masterpieces in some eyes, (mainly to those outside of the Jewish community) were perceived as an absolute, substantial insult from those within the Ladover community, particularly his father, which is evident when Asher tries to explain his reason for these “absurd” paintings by telling him: “‘I have a will, Papa. It makes me want to draw’…. ‘You will fight it. You will not waste your live with goyische foolishness. No, it isn’t foolishness any more. It’s worse than foolishness…. You bring drawings of girls without clothes into the house. What next? Next you will become a goy. Better you should not have been born’” (Potok 176).
The indisputable tone of angry rage in Aryeh’s voice troubles Asher with struggles of his own – to keep himself and his parents as well as the community happy – and by doing so all at the same time. These continuous struggles soon become failures. Failures in which Asher hesitates, but then decides to agree, to put his “greatest masterpiece” in a public, well-known art show – where this “great masterpiece” is a painting of his mother. His mother is the center object and character. The painting was a crucifixion. Asher’s entire family was beside him when they catch sight of the crucifixion. He knew that they would not approve just as he told himself earlier, especially his father, who Asher described his face, which “wore an expression of awe and rage and bewilderment and sadness, all at the same time. [Asher] remembered that expression…. Who are you? the expression said. Are you really my son? [My father] had not spoken to me then. He did not speak to me now” (Potok 361).
Everything in the Ladover community was changing. Individuality in any given community is exceptionally important and should be treasured and well kept. It has the ability to make or break a home, a family, a relationship and, of course, a community. Truman Capote and Chaim Potok’s characters, Dick Hancock and Perry Smith and Jacob Kahn and Asher Lev, are remarkably similar in a couple different ways. By comparing In Cold Blood with My Name Is Asher Lev it was obvious that Dick Hancock is to Perry, as Jacob Kahn is to Asher. Dick and Kahn, the more controlling of each pair, individually persuaded Perry and Asher to do something that went against their original judgment and conscience. Both Perry and Asher ended up alone – Perry was killed because of a murder he committed himself, and Asher was rejected from his once, loving family because of the crucifixion painting, as well as asked to leave the Ladover Jewish community by Rebbe Krinsky because of the threats made to him of others leaving if Asher was not.
Everything in the Ladover community had changed.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Capote, Truman. In Cold Blood. New York: Random House, Inc., 1965

Potok, Chaim. My Name Is Asher Lev. New York: Random House, Inc., 1972

Bibliography: Capote, Truman. In Cold Blood. New York: Random House, Inc., 1965 Potok, Chaim. My Name Is Asher Lev. New York: Random House, Inc., 1972

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood Essay

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard Eugene Hickock and Perry Smith were found guilty of murder in the first degree and their punishment is death. "Can there be a single doubt in your minds regarding the guilt in your defendants? No! Regardless of who pulled the trigger on Richard Eugene Hickock's shotgun, both men are equally guilty... penalty-death." (303)…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The brutal murder of the four Clutter family members was a tragedy to the “American Dream”, filled with anguish and longing. The Clutters’, known as the most secure and trusting family in their community, death caused paranoia and mistrust to spread throughout the town of Holcomb. There was no apparent motive for the crime, and there were almost no clues. Until criminal investigator Alvin Dewey received information leading him to the suspected killers, Perry Smith and Dick Hickock. After much investigation, questioning, and change of heart, Perry Smith finally admits to the crime, while Dick continued to maintain his innocence. Although Perry Smith pulled the trigger that ended the Clutters’ lives, Dick is just as guilty, if not more.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simple Gift

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly, in the novel ‘The Simple Gift’, Steven Herrick explores the idea taking control of one’s identity through numerous language techniques. Herrick uses free-verse poems to capture the thoughts, insecurities, emotions and ambitions of the three main characters (Billy, Caitlin and Old Bill), as well as telling their stories, showing various angles and their opinions. This allows the audience to understand the difference between each character and how each character’s sense of belonging is affected by notions of identity, and their surroundings. The main character Billy lives in a town called Nowheresville where he has a strong sense of not belonging and disconnection, particularly with his father. Billy eventually runs away from his violent, alcoholic father. “see ya dad. I’ve taken the alcohol… the old bastard will have a fit.”…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold Blood

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the non-fiction novel In Cold Blood, Truman Capote (1965) gives his own narrative of the Holcomb tragedy in which a family of four living out on a secluded farm were slaughtered with a shotgun by the collaboration of two individuals for a seemingly few dollars. In this novel, Capote gives a thorough character description of the two murderers, Richard Hickock and Perry Smith, as he recreates their experience (much as he sees it as it would be from their eyes). He gives accounts preceding the event, through it, and eventually into their trial and execution. From the descriptions Capote provides, a psychological analysis of the mental states of Hickock and Smith can be asserted. Richard Hickock can be seen as possessing significant traits of psychopathy, while his partner Perry Smith is seen with traits similar to that of a life-course persistent offender. Through the described personality characteristics and brief histories of Hickock and Smith, this essay will address this assertion with the two in question as individuals themselves, within their relationship to each other, and also as other characters see and analyze their psychological well being.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As people grow older they base their success on becoming rich or famous; their main motive in life is to live the American Dream. The environment that people grow up in, may determine for one how they achieve this dream. Most individuals who grow up in a well mannered home develop become very success and other may acheive what they want through a life of crime. In Truman Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood, the role of Richard “Dick” Hickock as an iconic character provides In Cold Blood with a more dramatic and artificial story line, that supports the overall theme of living the “American Dream.”…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the use of imagery, Capote paints a picture of the gallows that seems dark and gloomy, yet odd and peculiar. With its “ugly harness of leather straps” and its “two pale nooses attached to a crossbeam”, Capote creates an imposing image of the gallows, a place reminiscent of death and misery. However, he includes peculiar details making the reader picture the hangman as “reminiscent of a turkey buzzard huffing, then smoothing its neck feathers” wearing an old green cowboy hat “a weathered, sweat-stained oddity.” Perry’s corpse is described as a “dwarfish boy-man” with “his small booted” feet barely able to reach the floor. One thinks of the odd description to be a little humorous that such a child-sized man could commit four murders in cold blood. The illumination of these somewhat bizarre details, however, does not mask the darkness of the execution setting. It illuminates the darkness, contrasting ordinary details against the deaths of Perry and Dick making them feel more tragic and visible to the reader. Capote appeals to the audience with visual imagery to again, sympathize with the deaths of Perry and Dick. Would Capote’s purpose for the book be different if he had not formed a connection with these…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel, In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, the story first revealed Perry and Dick as “persons unknown.” Prominent to an inhuman, almost fabled importance, pure and unprovoked evil comes to destroy the serene existence of the Holcomb citizens. Capote, however, substitutes this naïve view with a more delicate interpretation, by discovering the physical, psychological, and environmental situations that cause two otherwise conventional human beings to commit such an atrocious act.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel, In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote, two characters named Perry and Dick play the role of the outsiders. In the novel, Perry and Dick murder the Clutter family in their own home, in the town of Holcomb,Kansas. “Well, I took one look at Mr.Clutter, and it was hard to look again. I knew plain shooting couldn’t account for that much blood”(Capote,66). This murder destroyed the balance of an entire community. This was due to the fact that the Clutters were very well known in the community, “Everything Herb had he earned with the help of God. He was a modest man but a proud man, as he had a right to be. He raised a fine family, he made something of his life”(Capote,79). The Clutters were liked by almost the entire town. By murdering this family, Perry and Dick had changed the town completely. Before, people didn’t lock their doors at all. After the murders, residents were quick to do…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood documents the quadruple homicide of Herbert Clutter and his family in Holcomb, Kansas. It is not a true memoir, as Capote was not a part of the events that took place; he traveled to Kansas immediately following the murders to write about the ensuing investigation and fill in the blanks about the actual goings-on in Holcomb, 1959. His writing is a true account of the murder from the beginning; not only was he in Holcomb during the investigation, he spoke directly with the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, Finney County citizens, lawyers involved in the case, and people directly involved in the crime. His narrative is vivid, emotional, and most of all, profound. His contention with crime and violence is apparent through his powerful account of the murder and the investigation.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Banal Evil

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Murder often makes a persons blood boil and ask the question, “How can someone do that to someone else?” Most of time when a gruesome act of violence happens people wonder, “What kind of human being does it take to do something like that?” Truman Capote’s book, In Cold Blood, is about such an act of violence; a murder that, when the reader walks away, only registers a banal. The killing of the Clutter family, which happened in 1959 in the town of Holcomb, Kansas, blew most people away with its senselessness and horror. Capote, however, writes the story with personal background on the killers, making them human and giving the reader, something most people do not get to hear or even care to know, a reason to the mindless murders. Evil is easily banalized when there is a story to go along with it.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A scrawl of a pencil ignited the flame of a shotgun and exploded the career of the American author, Truman Capote. His blood rushed with thrill, for he was the creator of a new genre, the nonfiction novel. He rivets readers with his uniquely-detailed character growth and a shocking murder plot of the Clutter family; yet, Capote's journalistic character in In Cold Blood hold untrue. Despite condensing time and ignoring small details, the extent of a nonfiction novelist's purpose is to always remain truthful because the audience should not doubt one’s writing and characters should hold true to the people they were based-on.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The townspeople’s reaction to the news of the killings is one of “amazement, shading into dismay; a shallow horror sensation that cold springs of personal fear swiftly deepened” (70). The Clutters’ demise has larger significance for this sheltered little part of western Kansas: it amounts to the infiltration of an “other” – a “poor, rootless, misbegotten” other – into their peaceable and prosperous little universe. The Clutter killings symbolize a collision of the two sides of America: the prosperous, self-assured “haves” with the disappointed and destitute “have-nots.” The ideology of the American dream is forced to confront those it has left behind. The town of Holcomb, following the initial trauma of the grim discovery, begins to confront the longer-term implications of the murders: “This hitherto peaceful congregation of neighbors and old friends had suddenly to endure the unique experience of distrusting each other” (88). That the town of Holcomb has experienced a loss of innocence is a point that Capote continues to explore in this section. Disillusioned by the crime, the residents are fraught with feelings of fear and mistrust, and many set off to settle elsewhere, hoping to regain their sense of security and well-being.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Name Is Asher Lev

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The struggle to find one's identity is a universal theme that is especially prevalent in Chaim Potok's novel, My Name Is Asher Lev. As an Orthodox Jew, Asher's gift for art is looked upon very unfavorably. Despite the disapproval of his community and father and the pain his art causes those around him, he pursues his passion and must find a way to reconcile the conflict between his religious identity and his individual identity.…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine what it is like to be a criminal in contradictory partnership, one man takes control while the other follows along, but what they have in common is the capability of killing a person without a problem. This is Dick Hickock and Perry Smith’s relationship; although they are not exactly alike they both are in on a murder that creates one of the most shocking tragedies in history. In the book In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, Capote displays the relationship between Dick and Perry as contradicting and extremely dysfunctional. Dick is a strong minded and harsh person not letting anything change his mind and turn him around; on the other hand Perry seems similar, but he actually has an emotional side and a conscience. In this novel, Capote develops this relationship…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However this connection to Truman is very rarely to Truman as a person but more a product. Christof’s connection to Truman can be seen when he speaks to his creation and says “I am the creator of a television show…you’re the star”. This demonstrates the idea that Christof is proud of and loves Truman. Yet these reasons are completely wrong and that he only loves him as he will be able to generate views and revenue. This point is furthermore emphasized when Christof is willing to kill Truman just for greater views. The Audience also feels a connection to Truman as a product. Throughout the whole film we see the two security guards constantly watching the Truman show and neglecting their real jobs in order to watch the Truman Show. We see them cherishing every moment of it. Nevertheless at the end we see that the security guards say at the end of the Truman Show say “what else is on”. This exhibits that much like normal products Truman is cherished and loved yet the moment he becomes obsolete he will simply be thrown away and discarded. These people feel a relation to Truman yet not a proper human…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays