Preview

Contingency Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contingency Model
Fiedler’s Contingency Model:
Fred E. Fiedler was one of the first leadership researchers to acknowledge that effective leadership is dependent on the characteristics of the leader and the situation. The contingency model helps to explain why a manager may be an effective leader in one situation and ineffective in another. The contingency model also shows which managers are likely to be most effective in what situations. It is said by Fiedler, that personal characteristics can influence leader effectiveness. Leader style is used to refer to a manager’s characteristic approach to leadership. There are two leader styles, to include: relationship-oriented and task-oriented leaders. Relationship oriented leaders are concerned with developing good relationships with their subordinates and being liked by them. Relationship oriented leaders focus on having high-quality interpersonal relationships with subordinates. A task oriented leader’s primary concern is to ensure that subordinates perform at a high level. A task oriented leader has a focus on how productive a subordinate’s job performance is in relation to their task accomplishment. According to Fiedler, there are three styles of leadership in a situational characteristic. These styles include: leader/member relations, task structure, and position power. Leader/member is when subordinates trust and are loyal to their leaders. Task structure is when the subordinate has a clear understanding of the job assignment. Position power is the amount of legitimate reward and coercive power a leader has by virtue of his or her position in an organization. (George & Jones, 2011)
Fred Fiedler started his work on the Contingency Model in 1951. The first presentation of the model was in 1963 and it was reviewed and revised in 1974 and 1978. The work of Fiedler has been dedicated to examining the individual's characteristics (to include: trait, intelligence, and experience) and the situation. Therefore, the model incorporates

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 27 M1

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are several factors which may affect my choice of leader style in my workplace situations.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By understanding leadership styles will help develop a person into being an effective leader. We will describe the author’s leadership style model and also look into the strengths and weaknesses of that model. Then compare and contrast leadership theories applicable to the author’s leadership approach. Leadership has different characteristics and behaviors then management…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Different types of leadership styles exist in work environments. There are advantages and disadvantages within each leadership style. The culture and goals of an organization determine which leadership style fits the firm best. Some companies offer several leadership styles within the organization. Organizations need strong leadership and strong management for optimal effectiveness. According to Robbins, we need leaders today to challenge the status quo, create visions of the future, and inspire organizational members to want to achieve the visions (Robbins, pp. 368). According to the Houston Chronicle, there are essentially five different types of leadership styles,…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler’s contingency model actually focuses on the two most important things in leadership styles. 1. Why, in particular situations some leaders will become more effective than other leaders even though they have equal credentials, and 2. Why a particular leader may be effective in one situation but not in another. Like the trait approach, Fiedler’s theory acknowledged that personal characteristics influence the effectiveness of leaders and he was particularly interested in the styles of leadership, and how a person approaches being a leader. Basically Fiedler considers leadership styles to be relatively fixed or enduring. He stated that leaders cannot be “taught” to be relationship oriented or task oriented, nor can a leader alter his or her style according to the situation. Their managers must either change the situation to fit the leader or put the leader somewhere where they will be effective.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The secret of why one style of leadership is better than another is still unsolved. The style of leadership consists of a general personality of the leader, demeanor, and patterns of communication in guiding people toward achieving personal or organizational goals. The research of leadership style has been dominated by subordinates’ self report perceptions about the behavior patterns of their leader in interpersonal relations, decision making, instructional leadership, planning, and efficiency of management…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of a leader is very important in any organization. Leadership styles have a direct and unique impact on the work environment and the success of an organization. A leader is someone who individuals look up to for guidance and support. Leaders are those individuals who are chosen to ensure that an organization’s goal is carried out. This paper analyzes the different attributes and styles of leaders, as well as looking at the leadership role of my current supervisor.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ILM3 Assignment 1

    • 2281 Words
    • 7 Pages

    performance of people within the organization. The leadership style implemented depends on the goals and…

    • 2281 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Task behavior refers to the extent leaders are likely to organize and explain what activities each of the subordinates is to perform and when, where, and how tasks are to be accomplished (Johansen, B. P., 1990). Relationship behavior is defined as the extent to which leaders are likely to maintain personal relationships between themselves and members of their team and provide socio-emotional support, psychological "strokes," and facilitating behavior (Johansen, B. P., 1990). Maturity is defined as "the willingness and ability of people to take responsibility for directing their own behavior . . . considered only in relation to a specific task to be performed” (Hersey and Blachard, 1982, p. 151). Effectiveness refers to the use of effective leadership behavior which is appropriate to the situation. Effectiveness is a continuum; thus leadership behaviors are more or less effective…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership involves the process of determining others behavior in order to accomplish a specific goal. Leadership styles may differ based on organizational structure, people, environment, and responsibility (Regan & Ghobadian, 2004). The leadership styles that the organization uses tend to be based on the attitudes of the individual about workers, competence, and how to get the task done. There are three main styles of…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership Fred

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fiedler believes a key factor in leadership success is the individual’s basic leadership style. So he begins by trying to find out what that basic style is. Fiedler created the least preferred coworkers (LPC) questionnaire for this purpose; it purports to measure whether a person is task or relationship oriented. The LPC questionnaire contains sets of 16 contrasting adjectives (such as pleasant – unpleasant, efficient-inefficient, open- guarded, supportive-hostile). It asks respondents to think of all the co-workers they have ever had and to describe the one person they last enjoyed working with by rating that person on a scale of 1 to 8 for each of the 16 sets of contrasting adjectives. Fiedler believes that based on the respondents answers to this LPC questionnaire he can determine their basic leadership style. If the least preferred coworkers is described in relatively positive terms (a high LPC score), then the respondent is primary interested in good personal relations with his coworkers. That is, if you essentially describe the person you are least able to work with in favorable terms Fiedler would label you relationship-oriented. In contrast, if the least preferred coworkers are seen in relatively unfavorable terms (allow LPC score) the respondent is primarily interested in productivity and thus would be labeled task oriented. About 16 percent of respondents score in the middle range. Such individuals cannot be classified as either relationship oriented or task oriented and thus fall outside the theory’s predictions. The rest of our discussion therefore relates to the 84 percent who score in either the high or low range of the LPC.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ethics of Leadership

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many general categories of leadership styles, trait, behavioral, situational, contingency, transactional, and transformational theories (Cherry, 2012). These categories highlight the evolution of leadership theories and study but also highlight the change in cultural beliefs in the world. There are several approaches within each category; we will leverage these specific approaches to define Nardelli’s style of leadership. Trait based theories focus on the characteristics that differentiate a leader from the generic employee. This theory focused on the inclination that leaders were born and had specific traits that made them leader. Such traits as height and physical attractiveness were just a few that were evaluated. They stated that if they were successful in one business they would be successful in another (Baack, 2012). Behavioral based theories…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Fiedler (1967) explored the idea that there was not just one ultimate style of leadership for a given circumstance, but leaders would be more effective by varying their leadership style depending on the situations that faced them. So It is evident from the theories that every leader exhibits numerous leadership styles and traits at different point in time.…

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fiedler’s theory viewed leadership traits as fixed and the situation needed to fit the leader. In the path–goal theory of leadership model by Robert House, the leadership style is more effective if the leader alters his/her leadership style to the situation they face (House 1971). So path goal leadership is a contingency leadership model. The situation that a leader faces is created by two variables, the environment characteristics and the employee’s…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays