Preview

Contex and Principles for Early Year Learning

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6121 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Contex and Principles for Early Year Learning
EYMP 1 CONTEXT AND PRINCIPLES FOR EARLY YEARS PROVISION

Question: An explanation of the legal status and principle of the relevant Early Years Framework and why the early year frameworks emphasise a personal and individual approach to learning and development

1.1 The statutory framework for the EYFS sets out the legal requirements relating to learning and development and the legal requirements relating to welfare. The EYFS framework has statutory force by virtue of Section 44 of the Childcare Act 2006.
The EYFS is a central part of the ten year childcare strategy Choice for parents, the best start for children and the landmark Childcare Act 2006.
This Act, which regulates the childcare in England, formalise the important strategic role local authorities play, through a set of duties. These duties require authorities to • work with their NHS and Jobcentre Plus partners to improve the outcomes of all children up to five years of age and reduce inequalities between them • secure sufficient childcare for working parents • provide a parental information service • provide information, advice and training for childcare providers.
The act also lays out registration and inspection arrangements, providing for an integrated education and care framework for the Early Years and general childcare registers. The sufficiency, information and outcomes duties came into effect on 1 April 2008 and the remaining provisions came into effect from September 2008.

The revised, simpler framework for the EYFS was published on 27 March 2012, for implementation from 1 September 2012.

This is an integral part of the Government’s wider vision for families in the foundation years. It demonstrates our commitment to freeing professionals from bureaucracy to focus on supporting children. Together with a more flexible, free early education entitlement and new streamlined inspection arrangements, this is a step towards a lighter touch regulatory regime. The



References: - Hale, J. E. (1994). Unbank the fire. Baltimore, MD: The JohnsHopkins University Press. - Harms, T., and Clifford, R. M. (1998). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. - Kostelnik, M. Soderman, A., & Whiren, A. (1999). Developmentally appropriate curriculum best practices in early childhood education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. - Prescott, E. (1994). The physical environment—a powerful regulator of experience. Child Care Information Exchange,100, Nov/Dec. 9-15 - Roopnarine, J - Shore, R. (1997). Rethinking the brain. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute. - Wardle, F. (1989). Case against public school early childhood programs. ERIC #ED310846 - Wardle, F - Wardle, F. (1999). Educational toys. Early childhood NEWS (Jan/Feb). 38.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful