Ratings: (1)|Views: 21,241|Likes: 31
Published by Md. Mahbubul Karim
Parlemantary & Constitutional Supremacy
See More C.L.B
Parliamentary Supremacy
Parliamentary Supremacy means that parliament is supreme over theConstitution. It is also called legislative supremacy because thelegislature is not a body created by the Constitution neither the powerof the legislature is limited by the Constitution. Legislature exercises anunlimited and supreme power in law making.Such legislative supremacy is possible only where the Constitution isunwritten and flexible. Three essential feature of parliamentary supremacy
1.There is no law which parliament cannot change or modify.2.There is no distinction between constitutional law and ordinarylaw.3.There is no body which can declare the law passed by theparliament illegal or inconsistent.
Constitutional Supremacy The Constitutional supremacy means that the Constitution is supremeover the parliament and the parliament can exercise its functions beingonly within the bounds of the Constitution. Constitutional supremacy ispossible only where the constitution is written and rigid. This constitutional supremacy is also called judiciary supremacy in thescene that the judiciary the highest court of the land is supreme overthe legislatureProfessor Hood Philips says that,“To say that a Constitution is supreme is todescribe its relation to the legislature’s power to alter the Constitutionis either limited or non-existent.” Actually a constitution with constitutional supremacy not only definesthe power of the legislature, it defines and establishes the principalorgans of the state. It is a source of their authority. It prescribes themanner in which and within their functions are to be exercised. Thethree organ of the state cannot do anything beyond the constitutionallimitations. If any organ does anything in violation of the constitutionallimitations then court can declare the action and this paramountpower of the court is given by the Constitution it self. The Constitutionhas sanctity over everything in the realm. This position is calledConstitutional Supremacy.
Characteristics of Constitutional Supremacy
1.The Constitution is written.2.The Constitution must be rigid.
3.
There must be, in constitution, either or implied declaration thatthis Constitution shell be the supreme law and any other lawinconsistent with this Constitution shell be void.
4.
The parliament is created by the Constitution itself and itexercises its legislative power being within the bounds of theconstitutional limitations.5.There is distinction between constitutional law and ordinary law
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
* The constitutional established supremacy as the fed. Gov. (preemption- when fed. Law or regulation precludes enforcement of state/loc. Law or regulations.)…
- 1627 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Parliament is the national representative body which has supreme legislative powers within its jurisdiction. While it oversees the completion of a number of other tasks parliaments’ main role is undoubtedly to make and pass laws and it has to be said that it achieves this role efficiently. Parliament and the members of parliament are elected solely by the people and are therefore responsible to the voting public. When passing laws parliament has the ability to, as part of its law making process obtain expert opinion with regards to tough and controversial issues. This process of law making is a completely structured procedure which follows a routine series of stages whenever a piece of legislation is proposed. These factors amongst others all contribute to the effective and efficient law making system that parliament is. While like any other structured organisation parliament has a number of weaknesses and faults these are minor and have very little effect on parliament as a law-making institution.…
- 1245 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Parliamentary gives Parliament superior and legal authority as they can make or unmake any Act of Parliament they wish and although the House of Commonsâ has most of the dominance they always need the support of the House of Lords to pass an Act. Parliamentary sovereignty refers to this joint power. The Human Rights Act 1998 is a law passed by Parliament that has limited the application of parliamentary sovereignty as it is made unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention although the courts can only make a declaration.…
- 525 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Constitutional law is the body of law which determines the exercise and control of governmental power between both the institutions of government and between those institutions and the individual. It indicates which bodies are responsible for exercising governmental power, and how those bodies should be composed. The constitution draws the structure of the government, divides governmental power between three branches of the state, namely the executive, the legislature and the judiciary, and provides procedures to resolve disputes of law between the individual and the state, or between private bodies or individuals.…
- 1266 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The argument against supremacy of the national government is that the states will not be given enough power; that the national government will reserve all power for itself and therefore…
- 871 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the entrenchment of the Charter impacted the judiciary to become more powerful, but also through the concept of judicial supremacy as opposed to parliamentary supremacy. First of all, “ the concept of judicial supremacy does not focus on the specific act of review itself. Judicial supremacy refers to the “obligation of coordinate officials not only to obey that [judicial] ruling but to follow its reasoning in future deliberations” (qtd. Whittington. par: 12). Essentially, judicial supremacy allows judges to make any “ constitutional authority and stems directly from the 1982 Constitution Act”(Clio’s Current, par: 1). Whereas parliamentary supremacy refers to the legislative body being the supreme leaders, and law-makers in relationship…
- 124 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…
- 122 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
-In a constitutional government, the power of the government is limited by some set of rules or document, which sets out the powers given to the government. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a…
- 744 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Most commonly refereed to as the Supremacy clause, Article VI Section II of the constitution established that three specific areas of legislation will take president over any other. The Constitution, Federal Statues, and Treaties are all specifically defined as the “Supreme Law of the Land.” This can be interpreted in a way such that the supremacy clause grants the laws made by the federal government priority over any state acts in the face of a conflict with the national law. In this respect, the Supremacy Clause follows the lead of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provided that “[e]very state shall abide by the determinations of the united states in congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted…
- 126 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
As soon as civilizations created constitutions, actions were being called unconstitutional by those who opposed them. In some instances, unconstitutional acts were the subject of revolution, regicide, or as happened in the American political system, the declaration of a Judiciary body. American judicial review can broadly be defined as the power of this such judicial branch of the government to determine whether or not the acts of all branches of the government and government official comply with the Constitution. It derives from the doctrine of "judicial supremacy", which in turn legitimises this definition by declaring that "both the letter and spirit of the Court's constitutional determinations bind all branches of government and government officials." (Siegel, Ely, McCloskey). Originating as far back as the late 1700's, this practice of judicial review, has allowed judges, thus, to maintain limited government and the rule of the people and to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution, by using the power allocated to them "to declare "null and void" any acts of the national government or of the states which they themselves deem contrary to the Constitution." (Irish and Prothro, 522). Thus, in effect the law becomes "what the judges say it is" (Irish and Prothro, 522).…
- 1743 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
1. Supremacy of National Law: The Constitution and federal law are the supreme law of the land; they pre-empt state constitutions and state law. Article 6, section 2 explains that when a dispute occurs between the state and national government the national government pre-empts conflicting state and local laws, making them unenforceable. The hierarchy of the law is as follows:…
- 982 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the next passage talks about how the legislative power needs to be established and in check. It is the supreme power of the commonwealth and unalterable. There are certain bounds on the legislature. Laws must be unvaried, laws must serve only the public, can’t raise taxes on the property of people without their consent, and can’t…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court and the one that decides and interprets whether laws or acts are constitutional. Simply put, they interpret whether a law is constitutional or not based on what they think the constitution means. Because the constitution doesn’t explicitly or definitively state anything, this interpretation can lead to many differing point of view. Some supreme court members opt for a strict approach to this document, whereby the words of the founders are meant to be taken literally and at face value, and anything that isn’t explicitly expressed in the constitution is not something that can be derived as such. Others argue that the founders couldn’t possibly have put every specific rule or…
- 2001 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A state constitution is supreme within the state’s borders. ANSWER: T PAGE: NAT: AACSB Analytic 6 AICPA Legal TYPE: =…
- 4405 Words
- 18 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Federal Constitution; Federal Legislation; State Constitution; State LegislationArticle VI, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, known as the Supremacy Clause, sets forth that three distinct areas of legislation be at the forefront. It states that the Constitution, Federal statutes, and United States treaties encompass the "supreme law of the land", therefore making them the highest areas of law possible within the legal system of America. Federal legislature can’t violate the Constitution because the Constitution is considered the supreme law of the land. Any federal law trumps any conflicting state law.State legislature is restricted by state constitution. States can’t pass laws that interfere with the Constitution or federal legislation. The Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state laws that interfere with the Constitution and federal legislation.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays