Preview

Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
906 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis
In the year of 1787 the rights and liberties of citizens of the United States would be changed for eternity. The Constitution was signed to create a democracy by which the United States was governed to protect against tyranny (cruel or unjust powers). Before the Constitution, under the Articles of Confederation, there was no chief executive or leader, no court system, and there wasn’t even a way for the central government to force a state to pay taxes. So, how did the Constitution guard against tyranny? Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and big states v. small states are all ways that protect the people of the United States and the Constitution against tyranny. Federalism or the compound government is the idea that …show more content…
Each of these three branches has different duties they must complete. The legislative branch includes a Congress, House of Representatives, and a Senate. The executive branch includes the President, and Executive and Cabinet departments. The judicial branch includes all of the courts, Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and the District Court. “Liberty requires that the three great departments should be separate and distinct.” (Document B) Separation of powers guards against tyranny because all three branches have equal but different power. The three branches are separate and distinct but they work together to form our government in a process called checks and …show more content…
Each state according to population got a number of representatives (each state had at least one representative), and two senators. This is what caused the big states v. small states issue. Why was this an issue? Well the large states obviously would have been happier with their representation in the House like, Virginia. “Representatives…shall be appointed…according to…
(Population)…” But, on the other hand small states would have a disadvantage of representation in the House like, Rhode Island. Big state v. small state guarded against tyranny because we came up with a compromise of two senators for each state. Through the compromise no one state gains more control and has more power than the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered what the US would be like if our government was a tyranny? Well, thanks to our founding fathers for creating a strong constitution, we don’t have to worry about that. The constitution was written in 1787 in Philadelphia. The problem was that the existing government that was under the Articles Of Confederation wasn’t very successful. Therefore, the fifty-five delegates representing twelve out of the thirteen states came together to tweak our constitution to create a strong government without allowing one person, or group of people to have too much power. The framers used the Constitution to protect against Tyranny in three ways federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler was a fear. They were currently under the ARticles of COnfederation. There was a problem with this though. In the background essay, it states that “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for a central government to force a state to pay taxes.”. They were in much need of a new Constitution if they were going to be an independent nation. The hard part was making the new government tyranny free. Eventually in 1787 the new Constitution is created.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the system is organized and equal for all states. There is no favoring the big states over the small states. This created equal power among the states, no matter how big the population…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The last guard against tyranny was the Big States versus the Little States which means that each state will have certain amounts of senator’s ( The bigger the state, the more senators). Articles in the Constitution state that a certain amount of representatives will be chosen for the amount of a states population.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May, 1787, 55 men from 11 states gathered in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. The object of the meeting was to frame a government that was strong enough to hold the states and people together, but also could guard against tyranny. At the time, the Articles of Confederation was in use, but it wasn’t working. So the framers were stuck with a big question. How could the new constitution guard against tyranny? Now, we know that the constitution guards against tyranny because it has federalism, checks and balances, separation of powers, and how representation is set up.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legislative branch makes the laws and consists of the members of Congress. The founding fathers were in a debate on whether to base the number of representatives on population, which would give more power to the more populated states, or to give each state the same number of representatives, which would give equal power to all states regardless of their populations. The Great Compromise resulted in the creation of two house…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three branches in the government were set up to be strong. The branches consist of a Legislative branch, Executive branch, and lastly a Judicial branch. First, we have the Legislative branch which is the system of representation the colonist created, they make the laws for our country. Next, we have the Executive branch which has the president, vice president, cabinet, and the executive agencies, and they make sure that the nation follows its laws. Lastly we have the Judicial branch and they are responsible for deciding if the laws are enacted by congress, or in line with the constitution.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the Articles of Confederation, each state, no matter what size, got one vote when making important decisions. The delegates from large states were opposed to this idea and felt that they should have more votes since they had a larger population. If the votes were relative to the population, then the people in the larger states would have more say than if there is only one vote per state. The delegates from smaller states liked having one vote because they believed they were…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tyranny

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The last guard against tyranny was the Big States versus the Little States or equal representation which means that each state will have certain amounts of senators and it all depends on their population. For every thirty thousand…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three branches in the United States government; legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Each branch has a few duties they are responsible for. The three branches work independently and together depending on what is going on. All branches are very important to the people of the United States but a branch may look of the others. The Legislative branch is in charge or making laws. The President is in the Executive branch and is appointed as Commander in Chief and makes important decisions for the United States of America. The judicial branch….…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought of what our country would be like if we had a dictator or a king? Well in 1787 a group of delegates for 12 of the 13 states met in Philadelphia , Pennsylvania to get together and try to better the country to guard against that. They ended up building the federal government so that there wouldn’t be any tyranny. It was also made to make sure that the government doesn’t become too much powerful. How do you think our rights were protected against tyranny by the constitution? Tyranny is when one person is given all the power to control a country of a government. The Constitution gurded against tyranny in several ways, which were federalism (doc A), separation of powers(doc B), checks and balances(doc C), and big states vs. little states(doc D).…

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, seat apportionment. In the Senate, there are twos seats for each state, giving us a total of 100 Senators, each will equal representation. In the Senate, each state carries the same amount of weight when it comes to making legislative decisions, thus making sure that smaller states always have a say in the matter. In the House, the number of seats that each state has is proportional to that state's population, leading to larger states have more representation. This leads to larger states like California and Texas pulling more weight for laws that benefit their own states rather than what is good for everyone.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays