Preview

Consistency of Bismarck's Aims

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
848 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Consistency of Bismarck's Aims
Consistency of Bismarck’s Aims
Consistent Aims
1) Patriotism to Prussia
Otto van Bismarck is credited with the unification of Germany. However, it can be argued that he deliberately fostered this myth, and that it was never his aim to begin with: he had not intended unification and was a Prussian patriot first.
He distrusted Southern Catholic German states and feared the submergence of Prussia in a united Germany. Above all else, Bismarck was consistently concerned to uphold and extend the power of the Prussian state and king, and, to a lesser degree, to exclude Austria. He was brought in as Minister-President by the King of Prussia in 1862 to combat liberal demands, however modest they were.
In the 1800’s, Germany was torn between princely conservatism on one hand, and fierce liberalism and nationalism on the other. Bismarck, as a noted Junker, certainly tended toward the former in the years 1862-1871. He did realise, however, that the liberal demands of German unification could not be completely ignored.
Due to his Prussian patriotism, German unification was not one of his aims. The creation of a NGC dominated by Prussia was what he hoped to achieve. The inclusion of the other German states was called a by-product of his never-ending pursuit of Prussian interests.
2) Willingness to Go to War
Bismarck’s first move as Minister was to build up the Prussian army. He had pronounced that questions would not be decided by speeches and resolutions, but by a policy of 'blood and iron'. Prussia was to resort to brute force to gain what she wanted. He was now declaring a policy of firm diplomacy and war which Bismarck consistently maintained during the years 1862–1871.
Bismarck always sought out German unification as his final goal to increase Prussian power – his willingness to go to war was a constant in his perseverance for success. The wars with Denmark, Austria and France all show that he believed he could unite German states by placing them in front of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communication via news papers and universities was not the only way in which liberal and national ideas were spreading. Another way was by the meeting of south German states. Metternich saw this as a major threat to the ‘status quo’ and therefore made it more difficult for liberal ideas to gain ground by persuading all the states to restrict the subjects which their assemblies could discuss. This stunted unification because it made the liberalist and nationalist ideas hard to spread.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As nationalism and its ideas began the journey across Europe, it started to unite people into nation states. One of the prime examples of this unity is Germany. Before Germany was united as a whole in 1871, the nation was separated into Germanic states and Prussia. Determined to unite them into Germany because of their ethnicity, Wilhelm hired Otto Von Bismarck, who was just the guy to bring everyone together. Bismarck had used carefully thought out tactics to unite the Germanic states. They needed Prussia in order to become a powerful Germany. “Prussia….could no longer carry alone the power Germany required for its security” [Bismarck, Document 5]. Finally getting Prussia after the Franco-Prussian War, Germany was then united as a proud and powerful Germanic nation. The French were also united through Nationalism. After realizing their…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto von Bismarck’s government in Germany represented a new kind of conservatism in the nineteenth-century Europe that was willing to change traditional conservative beliefs to better lead modern society. Bismarck was a realpolitik, which means he chose political alliances that would boost Prussia and Germany significantly, rather than morally preferable ones. Bismarck was able to successfully unify and govern the German Empire because he believed in the application of modern-day tactics and the idea that in order to grow an empire, you must be willing to put its’ needs first. In 1869, Bismarck showcased this belief when he issued a legislation that granted “all restrictions on citizenship of civil rights based on differences in religious confession…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck was a man of manipulation, provocation, disdain, and most of all he was a man of change. Otto Von Bismarck was a man of manipulation or the changing of one’s surroundings to better fit their needs and desires. Otto Von Bismarck used his ability to manipulate others so that he could help Germany (Prussia), develop a standing in Europe that would make them the number one power in Europe. Otto Von Bismarck was also a man of provocation or the pushing of others for the intent of angering them to take action for or against something. When Otto Von Bismarck was devising his 3 step plan for Germany, he needed to start a war with France but he needed them to make the first move, to do this, he sent France a very mean letter that was…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This made him one of German histories commanding figures. Bismarck express that he would rule without the permission of Parliament and with no legal budget. These two actions were an infringement of the constitution. In 1864 Bismarck had Prussia and Austria form an alliance and fought against Denmark to conquer Holstein.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One reason is all of the things he did to unite Germany and turn it into a world power. In 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president of Prussia. When awarded the title, he made his famous speech that said, “The great questions of the day will not be settled by speeches and majority decisions but by blood and iron.” Bismarck then knew that he wanted Prussian influence to be the leading power in northern and western Germany (“Otto von Bismark”). Bismarck begin his quest for german unification first by engineering a dispute over subsequent administration of Schleswig and Holstein and instigating a war against Denmark.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bismarck, was born into a land owning family from the junker class, and graduated from university with a history and law-degree. He was an alcoholic womanizer who never enjoyed his one-year of military service, finding it difficult to take orders from someone else. This idea shapes Bismarck’s greatest goal of collapsing the Bund and forming a new German confederation with Prussia, not Austria at the helm so that he could devise the terms of European operation and not have to comply with Austria. He entered politics in 1847 and believed that executive autocracy was the only manner of ruling, believing that might was unarguably right. This giving root to his fervent desire to raise a well trained Prussian army and is the reason for his success in the Danish, Austro-Prussian and Franco-Prussian wars as well as collapsing the Bund and uniting Germany.…

    • 2773 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As he could not just go to war with them as that would not create the Germany Bismarck had envisioned.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays