Congress Pros And Cons
Going back to 1883, The Pendleton Act, created a civil service system to help control where money was coming from. This was believed to give corporations preference because politicians would raise money by speaking to corporations and offering to put a stop to bills that would negatively affect them and promote laws that would be in the corporation’s favor. In 1907 Teddy Roosevelt signed into law the Tillman Act because he believed money was a negative influence on campaigns. This act banned corporations from giving money directly to candidates. The Taft-Harley Act of 1947 expanded on the Tillman Act by adding that unions could not directly contribute to candidates. These acts caused the creation of Political Action Committees, or PACs, which have a large influence on campaigns. In 1971, The Federal Election Commission Act, or FECA, was passed to help control PACs. The Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, or BCRA, tried to limit the influence that PACs had on elections. This act says that PACs cannot run ads within thirty days of an election. Finally, we come to the Citizens United VS Federal Election Commission, FEC. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United and this decision said that people, or PACs, can spend money the
…show more content…
For example, candidates have to spend money on radio and television ads so they can convince citizens that they are the representative for them. A suggestion to remove the money needed to do this is to have radio or television stations to run ads as a public service. If a station decides to allow an ad for a certain public office, then they must make itself available to run other candidates running for the same position. The United States could also allow stations to write off free political ads as a tax credit (LaRaja, & Schaffner
For example, candidates have to spend money on radio and television ads so they can convince citizens that they are the representative for them. A suggestion to remove the money needed to do this is to have radio or television stations to run ads as a public service. If a station decides to allow an ad for a certain public office, then they must make itself available to run other candidates running for the same position. The United States could also allow stations to write off free political ads as a tax credit (LaRaja, & Schaffner