Preview

Confessions: The Debra Sue Carter Court Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confessions: The Debra Sue Carter Court Case
In the early 1980’s in a small Podunk town of Ada, Oklahoma, a young woman named Debra Sue Carter, was savagely raped and killed in her own apartment after work at the local cocktail bar. Quickly, the town drunk was arrested in relation to the rape and murder with nothing more than a single “eyewitness” that placed him at the woman’s job that night. Many regulars to the bar said that “they would know if Ron Williamson was at the Coach Light and he wasn’t there.” They, in fact, named another man: Glenn Gore, the prosecution's main witness. Gore was also the man that Debbie’s friend said that she was afraid of and he was supposedly at Debbie’s apartment the night of the murder, according to the friend who received a phone call that night from Debbie. Gore was also seen being pushed away by the victim at the victim’s car the same night as the murder. …show more content…
Additionally, Investigators used Williamson’s dream confession as an actual confession even though they did not have it conveniently recorded, despite having the means to do so. In this confession, he said he dreamt that he strangled and stabbed Debbie. Investigators found that this was not only not the cause of death but that the victim had not been stabbed nor strangled. This, also conveniently, was produced one day before the prosecution would have had to drop Fritz’s charges. Another inmate, female, claimed to have overheard Williamson speaking to his mother on the jail phone threatening to kill her as he did Debbie if she did not bring him cigarettes. The defense did not challenge this. They could have by proving where the female inmates were held compared to the single jail phone that Williamson supposedly used. They could have also tried to find a guard that overheard it as well to strengthen or refute the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Loftus talked about a restaurant manager named Steve Titus who lived in Seattle, Washington. Steve Titus was 31 years old and engaged to a woman who was the love of his life named Gretchen. The couple had gone out for a romantic meal. On their way home they were pulled over by a police officer. Titus’s car resembled a vehicle that had been seen earlier in the evening. His car resembled that of a man who had raped a female hitchhiker. Titus resembled the rapist. The police took a picture of Titus and showed it to the rape victim. She said that he was the closest to the man she had seen. The police and prosecution proceeded with the trial. When Steve Titus was put on trial for rape, the rape victim had gotten on the stand. She said that she was sure that he was the man who had raped her. Titus was convicted and sent to jail. Titus had completely lost fail in the legal system, but he got an idea. Titus called a local newspaper and had gotten the interest of an investigative journalist. The journalist actually had found the real rapist. The rapist had confessed to the rape and was thought to have committed 50 rapes in that area. When the information was given to the judge, Titus was set free. But it didn’t end there. Steve Titus had lost his job, his fiancée, and his entire savings. Titus filed a lawsuit against the police and others he felt were responsible for his suffering. He had become obsessed with his trial. Days before he was to have his day in court, he woke up in the morning and doubled over in pain. He had died of a stress related heart attack at age…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the night Leroy McPhillen was a patron of The Bottom’s Up Pub, an intoxicated man began shouting obscenities at a woman seated at a table near Mr. McPhillen. As the woman ignored the man’s ranting, the man then approached the woman in a threatening manner. Before the man reached the woman, Mr. McPhillen invited the man to join him at his table. The man refused and grabbed the woman’s wrist. Mr. McPhillen then carefully twisted the man’s arm behind his back and restrained him with a neck hold. Mr. McPhillen refused the man’s request to release him, and firmly seated the man and threatened to punch him if he moved. The woman then informed Mr. McPhillen that the man was her husband.…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Salinas V Texas

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the morning of December 18, 1992, two brothers were shot and killed in their Houston home. Police were called by a neighbor who heard the gunshots, and then seen a “dark colored” car fleeing from the house. It was later found out that defendant, Genovevo Salinas, was at the residence where the murders took place the night before December 18th. When officers went to Salinas’ house, they arrived to a dark blue vehicle that matched the witness’s account of the car. Police asked Salinas a few questions, he let the officers have his shotgun, and then the police asked him to come down to the station to answer a few questions so they could “clear him as a suspect.”…

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first amendment in the Bill of Rights states “Congress shall make no law respecting…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A young 17 year old girl named Karla Homolka met 23 year old Paul Bernardo at a restaurant in 1987. By late 1989 Paul and Karla were engaged as a happy couple, while Bernardo was raping numerous women in the Scarborough region with Homolka’s approval. In total, he admitted to sexually assaulting 14 women and being related to 53 charges in total. Paul wanted Karla’s younger sister’s virginity because Karla wasn’t a virgin. In July 1990 Bernardo and Homolka served Tammy a spaghetti dinner laced with Valium stolen from Homolka’s workplace. These drugs rendered Tammy unconscious as Bernardo raped her. This first attack lasted only a minute before Tammy became conscious again and bernardo was forced to stop. Homolka stole animal tranquilizers from her work and after their family Christmas dinner, Bernardo and Homolka served Tammy the drugs through beverages. She began to choke on her vomit while being raped by both of them and died. This was one of their first videotaped acts, and they were both let off free after Tammy’s death was ruled an accident.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tarasoff vs Regents

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: On October 27, 1969, Prosenjit Poddar killed Tatiana Tarasoff. Plaintiffs, Tatiana's parents, allege that two months earlier Poddar confided his intention to kill Tatiana to Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist employed by the Cowell Memorial Hospital at the University of California at Berkeley. They allege that on Moore's request, the campus police briefly detained Poddar, but released him when he appeared rational. They further claim that Dr. Harvey Powelson, Moore's superior, then directed that no further action be taken to detain Poddar. No one warned plaintiffs of Tatiana's peril.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A little over a century ago an atrocious double murder was committed, in the two-half story house at 92 Second Street, in Fall River, Massachusetts. This crime shocked the city of Fall River, as well as the nation, as Lizzie Borden, a 32-year-old Sunday school teacher, went on trial for the murder of her father and her stepmother. (Augustine). An all male jury eventually acquitted her on the accusations.(Aiuto). To this day, the murderer of Andrew J. Borden and Abby Gray Borden is still unknown, but in the public mind everyone believes it was Lizzie Borden.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This leads us back to the analysis of whether or not to Hart’s confessions should be admissible, there are similar reasoning, but slightly varying answers amongst the Justices. It was agreed that the confession Hart made at the scene of the crime and to Mr. Big should be inadmissible. Yet, in regards to the confession made to the undercover officer, there were differing opinions. The two prominent ones being that after considering a prong by prong analysis of the confessions based on the probative verses prejudicial value that that confession should be determined at a new trial. Or that the confession should be dismissed based on the implied social and financial inducement. I completely agree with those who wanted to dismiss Hart’s confessions to Mr. Big and the confession he made at the scene of the crime. Based on the prejudicial influence…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Months later, on November 30th, married, 52-year-old father, Gary Ridgway, is arrested as he leaves his truck-painting job. Thankfully, it is the end of the longest running serial killer investigation in U.S. history; the break in the case was connecting the DNA taken when Gary Ridgway was arrested for the relatively minor offence of ‘loitering for the purposes of soliciting prostitution’. And this wasn’t the first time Ridgway’s connection to prostitutes had come to the attention of the police. In 1980, a prostitute he’d picked up accused him of driving her to the woods and trying to strangle her. Charges were dropped when Ridgway explained it away by saying she’d started to bite him while performing oral sex, and he only choked her to make her stop. Then again, in 1982, he was stopped with a prostitute in his truck and questioned by…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story of Olivia Tamayo who worked for Harris Farms for approximately six years is only one example of cases featured in the documentary. Her supervisor Rene Rodriquez raped Olivia Tamayo three times at gunpoint. Her voice was shaky in the interview when she recalled her ordeal, “He said I was his, and that he would never leave me in peace.” She tried to defend herself from her boss. She remained silent until she reported her case to a Rape Crisis Center. Human Services workers reported the abuse to the EEOC. Then the EEOC contacted the law firm of Smith and Johnson who took the case of Ms. Tamayo. Attorney Willie Smith was successful in winning a lawsuit that awarded her a damage settlement. However, the CEO Mr. John Harris sides with his Supervisor and denied the rape occurred. It took teamwork from the report by the Rape Crisis Center and working within a network of other services to bring a small amount of justice to her unjust treatment.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gary Heidnik

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Bellamy, Patrick. Truly Weird & Shocking. Gary Heidnik.(2006) Retrieved Sunday February 4th, 2007 from http://www.crimelibrary.com/.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Picking Cotton

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Police Department of Alamance County had never seen a victim so composed, so determined and so sure. Just a few hours after her horrifying ordeal, after the emotionless doctor swabbed her vagina for semen samples at the hospital, Jennifer sat down at the police station with Detective Mike Gauldin. "The first comment I remember her making was that, “I'm going to get this guy that did this to me.” She said, “I took the time to look at him. I will be able to identify him if I'm given an opportunity," Gauldin remembered her saying (Hansen, 2001). She began combing through photos, trying to help come up with a composite of her rapist.…

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The murder charge would take all of Huddleston freedom and he would be locked up in prison for the remainder of his life. The interviewer had first locked Huddleston’s story and double checked it. Huddleston statements remained unchanged and the exact story was told, from the hospital and at the police station. A period of time had passed and the story was still consistent, which meant he had retold the story to himself. Frankly, a…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You may have seen it films, you may have read about it but you will pinch yourself twice before believing this. Imagine killing someone, landing up in prison, getting out on parole and suddenly cut loose for 40 years while still on parole. Well, cut loose not voluntarily, but because the lawmakers simply forgot about you, just like that! This is the story of 79-yr-old Frank Dryman, the once notorious killer of Montana who killed a man and escaped the noose in 1951. Back then, he went by the name of Frank Valentine. Less than 20 years later, Dryman got out of prison and escaped parole because he did not like his wife (pinching myself yet again!). But guess what, his escape was hardly noticed. So much so that he too began to feel absolutely normal after a few years and lead a new life under different identities. That includes performing weddings under new identities, one of which was ‘Victor Houston’. Dryman then invented a whole new life and started a family. Aside from the wedding chapel business, he volunteered for local civic clubs. The fresh start went so unnoticed that he even claimed his benefits from the Navy where he served in the late ’40s. How about that? Dryman never thought of himself as a parole violator (no room to pinch anymore!). All was going fine until the victim’s grandson, Clem Pellet, an oral surgeon from Bellevue, WA, began to poke around. Pellet wanted to find out more about the Montana side of his family and his parents too had never spoken about the murder. Thus began his quest to unearth this entire incident, right until the cops knocked on the doors of Dryman. Now Pellet wants to capture it all in a book and is keen to meet Dryman to fill in some gaps. Understandably, Dryman is not eager to meet him. Catch Me if You Can…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carter Case # 3

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The format and form in which a job description should appear varies in semblance. There is no set format in which a job description should appear, however with technology ever increasing and the many changes in the way an organization completes a job analysis, long gone are the days of compiling a list of duties for positions that are forever changing. It is within the job specifications where an organization can show what human traits and characteristics are required to do the job effectively. Should an organization choose to go outside the firm for recruiting, it would be clear to what qualities the organization would be looking for in a candidate in order for the outside firm to utilize the right testing to acquire the desired candidate. Job summary should describe the general nature of the job and include only its major functions or activities. It should relate the effectiveness of each duty in succession, roles and responsibilities, as well as procedures to broaden the scope of company development.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics