Preview

Concept of Due Process

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
316 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Concept of Due Process
The concept of due process in the criminal justice system is provided by the Constitution that each person that is suspected of a crime whether that violates the rights of others even if the offender is from foreign lands to be to be prosecuted and sentenced in the United States. Each person that is accused of a crime is innocent until they are proven guilty, and are entitled to a fair and speedy trial. They are also entitled to a lawyer even if they cannot afford one, one will be appointed by the courts. They are also allowed to see all documentation that the courts have against them through the investigation. The due process of the criminal justice system is that no state shall take away life, liberty and property, without going through the complete due process. If all of the following acts where in place a right to an attorney, a fair and speedy trial, however there are time that the trials take longer than normal can be because the defense needs more time to prepare the case for the defendant. If these things where not in place people all over the United States would not be getting fair trials, and our prison systems would be overran. When the jury states that the accused is actually guilty beyond a reasonable doubt that is when the judge rules the hearing and convicts the person, it could be probation or prison time depending on the case. Even if the person is sentenced to life in prison could only mean 20 years depending on whether or not they have the possibility to parole. Even after he or she is put into the correctional system he or she is still able to contact with family, have visitors, and file for an appeal, but their freedom to walk down the street is taken from them because of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Werhane and Radin’s article “Employment at Will and Due Process”, they had shown the reasons why they believe the relationship of the employer and employee should not be bound by any contract or regulations. This means that they are argued in defense of Due Process and against EAW. They stated that the principle of Employment at Will (EAW) is a common-law doctrine that stated that employers will have the rights to whatever they want to their employees and able to fire, hire and promote anyone anytime with no valid reasons, laws and contracts necessary. This is not means that the employers did not give the employees any reasons to their actions, it is that the reasons that they give have no…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Framers of the Constitution intended the Speedy Trial Clause to serve two purposes. It was for preventing defendants from languishing in jail for an indefinite period before trial. Pre-trial incarceration is a deprivation of liberty no less serious than post-conviction imprison. In some cases pretrial incarceration may be more serious since public scrutiny is often heightened, employment is commonly interrupted, financial resources are diminished, family relations are strained, and innocent persons are forced to suffer prolonged injury to reputation.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process – the idea that the criminal justice system should operate under the rule of law – guides the actions of police, court officials, and corrections officers.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the use of a judge to listen to both sides of the trial, to the impartial jury that is used to decide the verdict of the trial. Everyone in the courtroom is there to offer a fair, and safe trial for whomever may have charges brought against them. It may be true that there are many things within the Criminal Justice system that may not work efficiently or even effectively, however there is nothing that is perfect. There is something to be said when it comes to the American Justice system; it gets many things right when it comes to equal rights and fairness for the American…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Broken Windows Theory

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Criminal Justice System is a necessary aspect of American life. America is known for being the land of the free. If you are living in America you have something called “rights”. Rights as a U.S. citizen are based off “The Bill of Rights” in the United States Constitution. The Constitution clearly states the rights that each and every American citizen are entitled to. Most of the population don’t quite understand how many rights they actually do have as an American. With freedom and rights in our citizens’ defense, it’s only natural that more crimes occur and the criminals become incarcerated. But, did you ever think maybe the innocent get put behind bars all because they did not understand their rights? I have the perfect example which forever changed American history and those wrongfully accused; it’s the case of Gideon v. Wainwright.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also setting in jail for months waiting on your trial is a clear violation of due process. To me, going to jail before you have been tried and convicted, innocent or guilty, is absurd. To be put in prison you need to have a trial by jury and to be found guilty without a reasonable…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due process advocates argue that the purpose of any civilized society is to secure rights and freedoms for each of its citizens-including the criminally accused (Schmallenger, 2003, p.18). The nature of individual rights is to ensure each individual receives protection as stated by the Bill of Rights. As the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights must be enforced. Without these rights, Americans might be reduced to governmental automatons, and forced back into the dark ages of segregation. Persons, not yet convicted of crimes, should retain their rights. After all, we are an "innocent until proven guilty" society.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our legal system grants important rights to all of us. The reason criminal defendants have these protections is because every citizen deserves to be innocent until proven guilty. I believe that basic rights would be protected for individuals facing criminal charges; however, those who violate laws should face proper punishment for their…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process Supporters

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The concern about gun control causes an uproar to many supporters of the due process system. First, many supporters argue that gun control restricts rights given to the people of the United States, by the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms). They argue, that if strong gun control laws were to be placed there would be a likely possibility for those laws to be claimed unconstitutional and a reevaluation of the law would have to occur. Second, the tense topic “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is raised. Believers of this often insist on evaluating how gun control laws have previously affected crime rates. When data is evaluated the reality of it is, crime rates don’t go down when gun control restrictions are increased. Most believe that bad people will find other ways to get a gun. Finally, due process supporters state that by creating strict gun control laws you are restricting law abiding citizens from engaging in many activities. For many, guns are a major part of their lifestyle, for example; hunting and sport shooting. These people are abiding by all the rules and regulations, therefore by restricting them from using guns it would be useless in the prevention of crime. Thus, supporters of the due process system continue to strive to keep gun restrictions to a safe and constitutional minimum. A Due Process Supporters View on Gun Control…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most important source of law is the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is the foundation of both federal and state laws. The United States Constitution also protects us the people, particularly the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. One amendment that I feel is most relevant today in criminal law is Amendment VI Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. According to (Mount, 2011) Amendment VI states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”. Tom Head wrote (Head, 2012) “The "speedy trial" clause is intended to prevent long-term incarceration and detention without trial--which amounts to a prison sentence without a guilty verdict”. If you were to prolong a trial, over time evidence can become lost, witnesses could and would forget facts, and an innocent person could end up doing time for a crime he did not commit. It is in the best interest of both the prosecution and the defense to have a speedy trial so that the proper facts and evidence can stay fresh. The right to a public trial assures the defendant that a fair hearing can take place. Allowing the public to view a trial helps reduce the risk of an unfair or a bias trial. An impartial jury of the state would be a jury that is not bias and comes from the state and district of which the crime took place. Head (Head, 2012) stated “Not only must jury members not have…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Due process should be the sole basis of the criminal justice system because it shows the true meaning of innocent until proven guilty in our society today. This “method or process” was created to help wing out those who are willing to change their ways and live right and enjoy the freedoms that we do receive. There are people who do make mistakes but some don’t deserve to be punished till death.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Rights

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Criminals have legal rights during trial procedures. Without these rights there would be so much confusion and controversy in the court system today. There are four of them that I will give a brief summarization of and explain to you the consequences that could possibly happen if these legal rights were no longer upheld in the court system today. They are; the right to confront witnesses, the right to an impartial jury, the right to counsel at trial, and last but not least the right to be competent trial.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due Process tries to focus on the rights of the individuals and limiting the power held by the government. People that wish to limit government tend to favor the due process model over the crime control model. In the due process model, people are innocent until proven guilty, and are not adequately punished until their guilt is well established through the criminal justice system.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays