Preview

Complexity Leadership Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Complexity Leadership Theory
The Leadership Quarterly 18 (2007) 298 – 318 www.elsevier.com/locate/leaqua Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era ☆
Mary Uhl-Bien a,⁎, Russ Marion b,1 , Bill McKelvey c,2 a Department of Management, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, P.O. Box 880491, Lincoln, NE 68588-0491, USA b Educational Leadership, School of Education, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631-0710, USA c The UCLA Anderson School of Management, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481, USA

Abstract
Leadership models of the last century have been products of top-down, bureaucratic paradigms. These models are eminently effective for an economy premised on physical production but are not well-suited for a more knowledge-oriented economy.
Complexity science suggests a different paradigm for leadership—one that frames leadership as a complex interactive dynamic from which adaptive outcomes (e.g., learning, innovation, and adaptability) emerge. This article draws from complexity science to develop an overarching framework for the study of Complexity Leadership Theory, a leadership paradigm that focuses on enabling the learning, creative, and adaptive capacity of complex adaptive systems (CAS) within a context of knowledge-producing organizations. This conceptual framework includes three entangled leadership roles (i.e., adaptive leadership, administrative leadership, and enabling leadership) that reflect a dynamic relationship between the bureaucratic, administrative functions of the organization and the emergent, informal dynamics of complex adaptive systems (CAS).
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Leadership; Complexity theory; Complex adaptive systems (CAS); Knowledge Era; Creativity; Adaptive organizations; Bureaucracy

As we advance deeper in the knowledge economy, the basic assumptions underlining much of what is taught and practiced in the name of management are hopelessly out of date…Most of our assumptions about



References: Achtenhagen, L., Melin, L., Mullern, T., & Ericson, T. (2003). Leadership: The role of interactive strategizing. In A. Pettigrew R. Whittington L. Allen, P. (2001). A complex systems approach to learning in adaptive networks. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 149−180. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). The great disappearing act: Difficulties in doing “leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 359−381. Arthur, W. B. (1989). The economy and complexity. In D. L. Stein (Ed.), Lectures in the sciences of complexity, vol. 1 (pp. 713−740). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a brain, (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley. Bak, P. (1996). How nature works. New York: Copernicus. Bamford, J. D., Gomes-Casseres, B., & Robinson, M. S. (2002). Mastering alliance strategy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Barkema, H. G., Baum, J. A. C., & Mannix, E. A. (2002). Management challenges in a new time. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 916−930. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press. Bedeian, A. G., & Hunt, J. G. (2006). Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 190−205. Bennis, W. G. (1996). Becoming a leader of leaders. In R. Gibson (Ed.), Rethinking the future. London: Brealey. Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 7(13), 7−19. Bluedorn, A. C., Johnson, R. A., Cartwright, D. K., & Barringer, B. R. (1994). The interface and convergence of the strategic management and organizational environment domains Boal, K., & Schlultz, P. (2007). Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 411−428 (this issue) Boal, K., Whitehead, C. J., Phillips, R., & Hunt, J. (1992). Strategic leadership: A multiorganizational-level perspective. Westport, CT: Quorum. Boisot, M. H. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bonabeau, E., & Meyer, C. (2001). Swarm intelligence: A whole new way to think about business. Harvard Business Review, 79(5), 107−114. Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551−564. Carley, K. (1997). Organizational adaptation. Annals of Operation Research, 75, 25−47. Carley, K., & Hill, V. (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations. In A. Lomi & E. R. Larsen (Eds.), Dynamics of organizational societies (pp Carley, K., & Lee, J. S. (1998). Dynamic organizations: Organizational adaptation in a changing environment. Advances in Strategic Management: A Research Annual, 15, 269−297. Carley, K., & Ren, Y. (2001). Tradeoffs between performance and adaptability for c3i architectures (part of the A2C2 project supported in part by the Office of Naval Research) Carley, K., & Svoboda, D. M. (1996). Modeling organizational adaptation as a simulated annealing process. Sociological Methods and Research, 25 (1), 138−168. Child, J., & McGrath, R. G. (2001). Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1135−1149. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge. Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 135−147. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1−25. Conger, J. A. (1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider 's perspective on these developing streams of research. Coveney, P. (2003). Self-organization and complexity: A new age for theory, computation and experiment. Paper presented at the Nobel symposium on self-organization Cusumano, M. (2001). Focusing creativity: Microsoft 's “synch and stabilize” approach to software product development. In I. Nonaka & T. Davenport, T. H. (2001). Knowledge work and the future of management. In W. G. Bennis G. M. Spreitzer & T. G. Cummings (Eds.), The future of leadership: Today 's top leadership thinkers speak to tomorrow 's leaders (pp Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581−613. Dooley, K. J. (1996, 10.26.96). Complex adaptive systems: A nominal definition. Retrieved September, 2006, from http://www.eas.asu.edu/~kdooley/ casopdef.html Dougherty, D. (1996). Organizing for innovation. In S. R. Clegg C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 424−439). Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1120−1153. Drath, W. (2001). The deep blue sea: Rethinking the source of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass and Center for Creative Leadership. Drucker, P. F. (1998). Management 's new paradigms (cover story). Forbes, 162(7), 152−170. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. New York: HarperCollins. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543−576. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15 (pp Goodwin, B. (1994). How the leopard changed its spots: The evolution of complexity. New York: Charles Scribner 's Sons. Gronn, P. (1999). A realist view of leadership. Paper presented at the educational leaders for the new millenium-leaders with soul. ELO-AusAsia On-line Conference. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423−451. Guastello, S. (2007). Nonlinear dynamics and leadership emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 357−369 (this issue). doi:10.1016/j. Halal, W. E. (Ed.). (1998). The infinite resource: Mastering the boundless power of knowledge. New York: Jossey-Bass. Halal, W. E. & Taylor, K. B. (Eds.). (1999). Twenty-first century economics: Perspectives of socioeconomics for a changing world. New York: Macmillan. Hales, C. (2002). ‘bureaucracy-lite’ and continuities in managerial work.British Journal of Management, vol. 13: Blackwell Publishing Limited, 51 Hazy, J. (2007). Computer models of leadership: Foundations for a new discipline or meaningless diversion? The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 391−410 (this issue) Heckscher, C. (1994). Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In C. Heckscher & A. Donnellon (Eds.), The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73−90. Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. : Cambridge Harvard University Press. Heifetz, R. A., & Laurie, D. L. (2001). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 79(11), 131−141. Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston: Harvard University Press. Henrickson, L., & McKelvey, B. (2002). Foundations of new social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling Hernes, G. (1998). Real virtuality. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 74−101). Hitt, M. A. (1998). Presidential address: Twenty-first century organizations: Business firms, business schools, and the academy. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 218−224. Hogue, M., & Lord, R. G. (2007). A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 370−390. Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. Hosking, D. M. (1988). Organizing, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 147−166. House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. (1974). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Journal of Contemporary Business, 81−97. Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Bennis, W, 2007 ‘The Challenges of Leadership in the Modern World’ American Psychological Association, vol, 62, no1, pp. 2-5 Viewed September 28, 2008, PsycARTICLES.…

    • 2431 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). Tranformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. San Diego, CA: Emerald.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Leadership Challenge

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Everyone has a role in accomplishing the mission and everyone directly impacts the effectiveness of his or her organization” (Horton, p 247). According to Conger and Benjamin (1999), creditability and authenticity lie at the heart of leadership, therefore, determining and defining one’s own guiding beliefs and assumptions lie at the heart of becoming a great leader. Providing direction and exercising influence are the two functions at the core of most definitions of leadership. Leaders work with others to create a shared sense of purpose and direction and to achieve shared goals. They help to establish the conditions that enable others to be effective (Leithwood & Riehl, 2003). Kouzers and Posner (2002) conducted research to analyze thousands of personal best leadership experiences in which they found remarkably similar patterns of action. They forged these practices into a model of leadership and developed the core essentials that every leader must practice to achieve success resulting in The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership. This paper will provide a brief analysis of this model through summarization of their book The Leadership Challenge and provide personal thoughts and application for use.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Gibson, James L. "Leadership: Emerging Perspectives." Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. Irwin: McGraw-Hill, 2012. N. pag. Print.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Part of being a successful leader is knowing what things lead to failure as well as what things leads to success. Effective leadership must have cognitive, interpersonal, and political skills; project management skills; and technical expertise (Yukl, 2006). Leaders must also be able to envision, organize, socially integrate, and externally span to ensure that his team is effective and efficient in achieving goals, maintaining team cohesion, and keeping the decisions compatible with the organization’s needs. Leadership must be able share this complex monitoring with his employees/teams in order to track information on trends and developments (Yukl, 2006). Leadership should be able to also develop strategic plans to address the organization’s requirements by considering long-term objectives, the organization’s strengths and weaknesses, core competencies, current and new strategies, and outcomes of these strategies (Yukl, 2006).…

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The path-goal theory, also known as the path-goal theory of leader effectiveness or the path-goal model, is a leadership theory in the field of organizational studies developed by Robert House, an Ohio State University graduate, in 1971 and revised in 1996. The theory states that a leader 's behavior is contingent to the satisfaction, motivation and performance of his subordinates.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of what leadership actually looks like as it is practiced by public managers. It uncovers five…

    • 9935 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Worldcom Failure

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Pearson Education Company.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. (2007) Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge, New York: HarperCollins Publisher.…

    • 3800 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Transformational Leadership

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Transformational leadership is one of the most important leadership patterns, and has been widely researched throughout the years since 1978, when James MacGregor Burns first introduced the concept of transforming leadership in his descriptive research on political leaders. “For Burns, leadership is a process of evolving interrelationships in which leaders are constantly influencing and modifying employees’ behavior until organizational goals and the vision of the leader…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hierarchical Team

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A hierarchical team is a type of team organization structure in which the team is divided into hierarchies and there are many middle management (Mohr 1982). There is an overall manager of the team who is place at the top of the hierarchy. This manager is responsible for leading or controlling the managers in each hierarchy to make sure that the team’s objectives are met as well as the overall objectives of the organization. The manager works with the middle managers to make sure that the team is ran smoothly and that the organizational goals are being achieved by the team.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Learning Organization Survey

    • 8708 Words
    • 35 Pages

    This research project analyzed 8 variables in United World School of Business to determine whether the organization is a learning organization or not. The problem was that the United World School of Business leadership did not understand the components of a learning organization and whether the executives had any relationship to the success or failure in the organization for cultivating a learning organization.…

    • 8708 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If you are a student on the module named above, or are teaching on this module,…

    • 17700 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goodlife

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Kanugo,A1998, 'Leadership in organizations: looking ahead to the 21st century ', Canadian Psychological Association, May 1998, PP2-4…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    B&Q Case Study

    • 3687 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization studies, 16(6), 1021-1046.…

    • 3687 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays