Preview

Comparison of Sytems and Scientific Theories

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1068 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison of Sytems and Scientific Theories
Comaprisonof Systems and Scientific Theories Theories of OrgComm 10/12/09
Introduction
Organizations have evolved in many different ways throughout history. On one spectrum of the different theories that are to be examined is the Scientific Management theory, which has its roots in early forms of organizations and uses a theme that is based on efficiency. The other theory that will be used to compare and contrast with Scientific Management will be Systems theory. These two different perspectives are exactly that, different, however there may be certain types of organizations that would be more efficient using either of the theories as a backbone to the way their organization functions. My interest is based on the basic principles of these theories and the similarities and differences that arise within the core of what they represent. And the different work environments that these two theories are being used and why that may be.
Systems Theory
System’s theory relies heavily on the theme: maintaining that a system is greater than the sum of its parts. It is defined as “the trans-disciplinary study of the abstract organization of phenomena, independent of their substance, type, or spatial or temporal scale of existence. It investigates both the principles common to all complex entities, and the models which can be used to describe them.”( Heylighen, 1992)In a system, interdependence is an aspect of System Theory that is essential. A person or employee is dependent on the company they work for, and the company is also dependant on the person to perform the tasks that they are required to. In order for there to be satisfaction on both ends this communication must occur. Information flow is an essential part of this theory and the idea of which direction information is being sent and the feedback that is received is a main aspect to this theory. This is shown with the sender, message, channel, and receiver model.
Scientific Management

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mgt 300 Study Guide - Exam 2

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Chapter 2: The classical approaches (scientific management, administrative principles, and bureaucratic organization) share a common assumption: people at work act in a rational manner that is primarily driven by economic concerns. Scientific Management: in 1911, Fredrick W. Taylor published The Principles of Scientific Management, in which he made the following statement: “The principle object of management should be to secure maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for the employee. He noticed that many workers did their jobs their own ways and without clear and uniform specifications. He believed this caused them to lose efficiency and underperform. He believed the problem would be fixed by scientific management: emphasizes careful selection and training of workers and supervisory support. Principles of Scientific Management: 1. Develop for every job a “science” that includes rules of motion, standardized work implements, and proper working conditions. (Gilbreths motion study- the science of reducing a task to its basic physical motions)2. Carefully select workers with the right abilities for the job. 3. Carefully train workers to do the job and give them the proper incentives to cooperate with the job “science.” 4. Support workers by carefully planning their work and by smoothing the way as they go about their jobs. An example of its present day influence can be seen at United Parcel Service where many workers are guided by carefully calibrated productivity standards. The point is that savings of seconds on individual stops adds up to significant increases in productivity. Administrative Principles: in 1916, Henri Fayol published Administrative Industrielle et Generale, a book that identifies 5 “duties” of mgmt, which closely resemble the 4 functions of mgmt we talk about today: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Administrative Principles: 1.foresight- to compete a plan of action for the future 2.Organization- to…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational and management analysis is an integral part of any organization that desires to be successful. In the world we live in today and its environment, teamwork, delegation, information technology has a lasting impact on any organizations core and character. This type of characteristic lends to an organization’s cost reduction, waste reduction, employees satisfaction as well as the overall efficiency of the company. To possess the ability to have an organizational and management analysis and review with departmental managers, senior executives are necessary. This lends to a multi-dimensional examination and gives a detailed insight of how the organizations actually functions and were it needs to be restructured if necessary, (Jones, 2006). Understanding and identifying the various styles of organizational theories can aid any organization in preparing for its future success. For managers, it is imperative that they have the capability to adapt their managerial styles in order to push through and keep the success of the organization intact. This paper is designed to give a description of the different styles of organizational theories; a comparison of management styles and theories and which style currently describes the writer’s present organization theory and management style.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This research paper addressed and discussed the three types of management styles and its role within an organization. Specifically, these management styles are the scientific management, human relations management, and the systems management. Though the early styles, scientific management and human relations management were acceptable for the times in which they were developed. Neither was perfect. Hence, today both exist in modified forms. However, both…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prison Management Styles

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Organizations and businesses alike all have managers and management styles that they abide by. Some may be company policy; while others seem to be implemented by the manager’s themselves. In this paper, three different management styles are explained; Scientific, human relations, and systems management styles. All have been used in different organizations, and some are still used today. In order for a business to effectively succeed in their goals, a certain management style needs to be used.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Systems Theory

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Running Head: GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY General Systems Theory General Systems Theory Strengths Weaknesses Although there are several strengths when organizations utilize general systems theory, there are also weaknesses to this modernistic approach. One example of a weakness is the issues organization may face when one subsystem fails. This can become contagious and cause the organization serious system issues. If one subsystem fails, then the others may not be able to produce without it. An option to counteract this weakness for an organization would be to invest in cross-training subsystems. Application In every organization, general systems theory exists. The organization or system consists of common integrated parts or departments called subsystems. Each subsystem affects the others and also affects the organization as a whole. An example of an organization that demonstrates general systems theory is theprofessional services firm AlixPartners, LLP. Within this organization there are several subsystems or departments (AlixPartners, 2009). The first subsystem in the organization is the executive leadership team. This team sets the vision and mission for the organization. This subsystem also creates and demonstrates the core values of the organization. Without the executive leadership team, the organization would have no purpose. The organization would also not know how to obtain the goals without the leadership teams(AlixPartners, 2009). This subsystem sets the example of the company culture. Another key subsystem that is crucial to the system as a whole is the administrative system. This subsystem includes several departments within it and all contribute to the success of the system. The departments include risk management, finance, human resources, marketing and internal information technology. Without these subsystems, the consultants would not be able to provide clients with their services. Each of the individual departments contributes to…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Projects and Systems Theory

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Systems now are everywhere in our life, from the solar system to home entertainment systems, from water treatment to national security systems (Auyang 2004). The concept of ‘system’ serves to identify those manifestations of natural phenomena (Laszlo and Krippner 1998), so that it is very important to clarify the systems definition.…

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management has been discovered since 3000 BC in city of Ur (Iraq) where written records as a means of recording business transactions was found (Wolfgang, et al. 1995). Management was essential for every company to run their business efficiently. Without a management, businesses can’t control their workers effectively, there will be a lot of wasted motion and the outcome of the products is not very satisfying. The beginning of the twentieth century businesses were expanding and capital was available. However, labour was in short supply (Ryan, 2008). Management began looking at methods to improve efficiency. Frederick W. Taylor of the Midvale Steel Company recognized the need for scientific methods to management in order to increase productivity. He concerned to find a perfect management that can produce more products in less time and effort, and then he came up with an idea that called scientific management or often called Taylorism.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mantell, L. (1972). The Systems approach and good management. Reprinted by the Board of Trustees at Indiana University.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    People and processes are the main elements under management purview, and it is interesting to learn how managerial philosophy pertaining to these two elements has evolved from the Industrial Revolution throughout the Progression Era and into the modern workplace. The purpose of this paper will focus on Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management, also known as the Taylor System, and Elton Mayo’s Human Relations business models and how they relate to this managerial evolution.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper is an overview of four important areas of management theory: Frederick Taylor 's Scientific Management, Elton Mayo 's Hawthorne Works experiments and the human relations movement, Max Weber 's idealized bureaucracy, and Henri Fayol 's views on administration. It will provide a general description of each of these management theories together with observations on the environment in which these theories were applied and the successes that they achieved.…

    • 2426 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Scientific and Administrative management shared a common goal - to increase the efficiency of the organisation. As well as a common goal both management theories shared the following principles:…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enginner

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hence, Scientific Management has had a decisive and long impact on the industrial practice and on the theoretical ideas of organizations in general. Later on, the theory was criticized by both employees and managers as scientific times study disregarded their own common sense and judgment. As a result of this resistance and the spread of other view of humanity, Scientific Management is no longer prevalent as a managerial ideology. However, it still functions as a guideline for procedures, not only in the industrial sector, but also in the service sector.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 2302 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The principal objective of management should be to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer and their employees (Taylor, 1967), Taylor believed in his initiative and incentive system, which meant that if employees worked more efficient and productive by taking the initiative to do their work, they would be rewarded with incentives (mainly financial). This system supported the principles of management, as employers would get more out of their employees, and employees would get rewarded for their work, which would often secure maximum prosperity. When looking at the present day, one could argue that Taylors initiative and incentive system is still relevant today, in today business world managers and employees often get a bonus for their performance. And although Scientific Management was present in the 19th century, it also has relevance in the present day. This essay will explain the theories of Scientific Management before answering the given…

    • 2302 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    How much relevance classical management theory might enjoy today will, without doubt, depend on the component under examination. The degree to which Fredrick Taylor’s Scientific Management approach applies to management of an organisation in the 21st century varies from that to which Henri Fayol’s Theory of Management or Max Weber’s Bureaucratic Theory apply.…

    • 3660 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Systems Paper

    • 1231 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many seek an education in Communications this day and age -- it is a field that has now, more than ever, become essential to the American economy and to society at large. While it may seem conceptually straightforward, there are many different types and methods of communication currently utilized by professionals. A “system” is a model describing a collection or process of things/variables possessing certain characteristics and relationships. Systems theory is the trans-disciplinary study of the abstract organization of phenomena, independent of their substance, type, or spatial or temporal scale of existence. It investigates both the principles common to all complex entities, and the models, which can be used to describe them (Principia Cybernetic). Systems theory was developed as a byproduct of studies in, originally, biology and engineering. One key founder of the systems movement was Ludwig von Bertalanffy, a theoretical biologist who was interested in the study of “living systems” within his own academic realm.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays