Preview

Comparison Of Marxist Theory And The Safe Streets Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1104 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Of Marxist Theory And The Safe Streets Act
“In theory, we are all equal before the law. In practice, there are overwhelming privileges that people possess.” This quotation was said by Arianna Huffington, an American lawyer and associate justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. In this quotation, Huffington recognizes that the law has flaws and must be altered in order to achieve equality. There are many groups in society who are not adequately represented by the law. This paper will discuss how the official version of law does not appear in practice. Additionally, the essay will use Marxist theory and the Safe Streets Act to show how law is a form of power. This will be followed by a discussion regarding the shift in the rights of members of the LGBTQ community. Finally, …show more content…
The official version of law states that law in theory appears to be an impartial, objective and equal system of resolving conflict. The law itself is viewed in a positive light because it is premised on principles such as democracy and the rule of law. The law makes society believe that legal decisions are based solely on facts and rules. This means that law is depicted as separate from external values and corruption. For example, the statute of Lady Justice is a visual depiction of how law represents objectivity, regardless of wealth, power or identity. Every courtroom has a Lady Justice or a similar figure, which reminds citizens of the positive power of the law. Lady Justice’s scale is a symbol of equally, her blindfold illustrates that justice is blind, and her sword represents law as a form of protection. However, in practice law does not fulfill the objectivity standards that it …show more content…
Marx determined that exploitation was an inherit part of the capitalist system, because of the class division between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx defined the bourgeoisie as those who, “own and control the businesses, factories, land and capital.” Additionally, the proletariat were the individuals who sold their labour to the wealthy. Due to the structural division between the rich and the poor, Marx believed there was a difference between law as it appears and law, as it is. Therefore, Marx concluded that law serves the interests of those in power because it furthers the economic domination of the bourgeoisie. Specifically, Marx states that, “it is a form of concealed domination over the worker.” This means that law aids in maintaining the concealment of the inequality that exists in society. In today’s society there is a class divide between the wealthiest one percent of the population and the poorer ninety-nine percent. Therefore, Marx believes this economic division is a result of the law reflecting the interests of the dominant class, rather than the general interests of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Magna Carta And The Quebec Act
    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing The Magna Carta And The Quebec Act

    The law is an intricate system of principles that regulate the activity of citizens and enforce sanctions through imposition. This order was developed through a legal evolution that many individuals fail to recognize due to disinterest in history. In order to comprehend the current state of law, one must refer to the past as it enables individuals to appropriately analyze the future. The Magna Carta and The Quebec Act are key developments that played a vital role in the just formation of law in modern society.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Changing Experiences of Consumers from the Year 1900 Until Present Day. How Do the Theories of Marz, Durkheim and Weber Help to Explain the Changing Consumer Experience and the Emergence of Contemporary Consumer Society
    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare and Contrast the Changing Experiences of Consumers from the Year 1900 Until Present Day. How Do the Theories of Marz, Durkheim and Weber Help to Explain the Changing Consumer Experience and the Emergence of Contemporary Consumer Society

    Marx presents his theories as a materialist understanding of society, explaining capitalism as an unequal system based on the exploitation of the lower class (Abercrombie N et al, 2006), a system based on surplus value being extracted, the capitalist’s…

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just And Unjust In Plato's Republic
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Just And Unjust In Plato's Republic

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sutton Marxist Theory, Summary
    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sutton Marxist Theory, Summary

    Sutton believes studying Marxian Theory is a good way to explain how economics shape the legal system. Marx argues the institutional structure of capitalist society drives historical and legal change which further enforces the social relationships. Moreover, as the economic systems in the world change so do the legal system. Today, law favors the interests of the affluent and power elites. To understand how class conflict drives social change, which includes legal change, we need to study Marxist theory, esp. his work that relates to legal development and the context in which his theory was used throughout history.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Western Civ The Communist Manifesto Pa
    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Western Civ The Communist Manifesto Pa

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Influentia In Brave New World Marxism Essay
    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Influentia In Brave New World Marxism Essay

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Proletariat: The Communist Manifesto
    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Proletariat: The Communist Manifesto

    Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. He described how the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the work of the proletariat. Therefore, capitalism requires an underclass. But Marx predicted that the continued exploitation of this underclass would create great resentment. Eventually the proletariat would lead a revolution against the bourgeoisie.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Buisness Law
    • 48539 Words
    • 195 Pages

    Buisness Law

    What is Law? 1. The law in the United States has been influenced by English, but not by French or Spanish law. F [moderate p. 3] Law is intended to protect persons, but not their property, from unwanted interference from others. F [easy p. 3] Businesses that are organized in the United States are subject to its laws, but not to the laws of other countries in which they do business. T [moderate p. 3] Promoting social justice is a function of the law. T [moderate p. 4] Law serves the functions both to facilitate orderly change and to maintain the status quo. T [moderate p. 4] The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that it is improper for a party to be convicted in a criminal case if another party involved in the same criminal activity has been acquitted. F [moderate p. 5] One goal of the law is to anticipate all disputes that can arise in the future and to establish laws that address all situations before they arise. F [moderate p. 4] The United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education demonstrates that the law’s function to maintain the status quo. F [moderate p. 5] In the case of Ashcroft, Attorney General v. The Free Speech Coalition, the United States Supreme Court set aside portions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act, because the Act violated the First Amendment’s free speech clause. T [moderate p. 6] According to Anotole France, the law should apply equally to the rich as well as the poor. T [easy p. 5]…

    • 48539 Words
    • 195 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: Saving The Working Man
    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Karl Marx: Saving The Working Man

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Communist Manifesto Ethos Analysis
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communist Manifesto Ethos Analysis

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Factors That Can Influence Justice in Americal
    • 2533 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Factors That Can Influence Justice in Americal

    The Supreme Court is another factor that ensures justice in America. “Equal Justice Under Law” – These words are written above the main entrance to the Supreme Court building, express the ultimate…

    • 2533 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies Essay- Rule of law
    • 1307 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Legal Studies Essay- Rule of law

    Law is necessary for the effective operation of a society as it ensures the protection of a population and certifies that justice is fair. The law is essential as if it was non-existent, society would descend to anarchy. The law is in place to protect the whole of society, especially weaker individuals or groups within a community. Another reason that law is fundamental, is it provides equity and fairness within society; however, this is not always accurate as a number of aspects can result in an inequality such as an individual’s financial status, or a language barrier. This can be supported through various media files regarding legal processes, concepts and outcomes.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Social Norms And Criminalization Processes
    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Norms And Criminalization Processes

    As we understand, law regulates behavior. But as Gustafson notes, law also expressed the majority collective vision of social goods, ills, and moral values. The law is defined by and maintained by the “norms.” The inherent purpose of the law is to marginalize and punish those…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Enlightenment Research Paper
    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Enlightenment Research Paper

    Marx believed that the poor were working their fingers to the bone to create value for society, while the rich simply siphoned off a portion of that value, which had been created by the poor. The rich do this without putting any effort into creating this value or their own value. In order for society’s productivity to be maximized, rich people’s syphoning off of a share of production must be done away with. Instead, the means of production (factories, stores, natural resources, etc.)—which rich people owned and used in order to siphon off poor people’s productivity—ought to be owned by the people themselves as a collective group. This prevents the rich from using their ownership position to syphon off a portion of society’s productione. Now, the people would continue to do all the producing, but the results of production would benefit only the people. In other words, each member of society must do what he or she can to produce the good and services society…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Law
    • 15253 Words
    • 62 Pages

    Marx and Law

    There is no sense in which Marx can be described as just a legal theorist. He did not write any systematic works on legal science or jurisprudence; however, his observations on law are both immensely penetrating and contain an extremely subtle interweaving of philosophical, political, economic, and legal strands. Marx was also at the centre of many crucial intellectual and political debates of his time. In order to try to unpack some of these debates, elucidate his views on law, and retain some overall clarity, I divide my remarks into five sections, which will inevitably overlap. The sections covered are: the problems of discussing Marxist jurisprudence; the philosophical background to the analysis of law and the state; materialism, political economy, and law; base, superstructure, and the ideology of law; and finally, law, politics, and the state. PROBLEMS OF MARXIST JURISPRUDENCE There are a number of problems for any student of jurisprudence or politics trying to grasp Marx's approach to law.' First, there is the puzzling point that neither Marx nor Engels had a positive normative theory of law, crime or deviance. In fact, much of the time Marx appears predisposed simply to ignore the question of law as peripheral, or at least to treat crime as a symptom of the conflict within a class-based society.' He certainly offers no clear encompassing definition of law. Marx's jurisprudential thought is often premised upon a critique of law per se, and what he has to say tends to be overwhelmingly negative in character. This is fine if one's purpose is 'critique' and nothing else, but it is a definite handicap if one wishes to say something more positive about the nature of law, law reform rather than its overthrow, or the future of law (e.specially if one believes that law has a future role in society). A second problem relates to the sources for Marx's…

    • 15253 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics