Preview

Comparison Between Social Exchange And Conformity Theory

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
882 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Between Social Exchange And Conformity Theory
If a person was walking and fell scattering a handful of paper, then more bystanders should help pick up papers if they saw another person helping out, in comparison to no one assisting them, because of the social exchange and conformity theory. The social exchange theory is also known cost-benefit analysis or as utilitarianism, where people debate on whether or not their act of kindness is a costly or a gain for them in the end. Conformity can be defined when a person changes their behavior in order to satisfy a group norm. This hypothesis reflects the findings from the Kitty Genovese which exemplified the bystander effect; the phenomenon where if there are more people present, fewer people will be willing to take action. This experiment was an attempt to create a norm, since the behavior that was being mimicked was to pick up the scattered papers. …show more content…
It was done within a 2-hour time span on each day, every 30 minutes. The independent variable in an experiment is aimed to be the only variable the is manipulated or changed in order to produce more accurate and consistent data. The dependent variable in an experiment is the variable that is measured from the results. This was a field experiment – a simulation that is not performed in a laboratory – and makes the experiment more difficult to set controlled variables. Controlled variables should have unchanging situations, to have more reliable data in an experiment. There would be more genuine responses from the participants however, by means of a field experiment since they would not expect their reactions to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bio Lab

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Controlled variables in the experiment include the type of beaker used (150mL max), the amount of water used for each trial (100mL), and the amount of drops of food coloring used for each trial (2 drops). These things were necessary to keep the same in the experiment because if they were changed, it would skew the data and make it inaccurate.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Furthermore, when reading over the procedure you can conclude that the controls of this experiment are the layers of turgid spinach layers, the container, the sensors, and the aluminum foil. The variable of this experiment, nonetheless, is the amount of light used throughout the experiment. The reason for this is because you begin with no light and then use the light for the second set of data.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Photosynthesis Lab

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If you grow yeast in a sealed test tube filled with water and a food source, do you think these growth conditions are aerobic or anaerobic?…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physio Lab

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The amount of time given is the independent, the number of squeezes are the dependent variable, and the controlled variables are the number of trials during the experiment.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PSY 100 Assignment 1

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bystander Effect is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to situations in which individuals do not extend any means of help to a victim when others are present. One clear cause that underlies the basis of this occurrence is the number of people or, bystanders, involved. While this argument forms the basis of the effect, I also believe that ambiguity, or in this case, the diffusion of responsibility amongst those present, plays a deeper role in the passivity of the bystanders. I believe that as the number of bystanders increases, they will each experience a diminished responsibility towards aiding the person in need and as a result, ignore or pay minimal attention to the victim.…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch carried out an experiment in 1951 to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform. Asch used a lab experiment, where 50 male students from a college in the USA participated in a ‘vision test’. Using a line judgement test, one of the more naïve participants was put in a room with 7 confederates. The confederates had agreed in advance what their responses would be involving the line task. The real participant didn’t know this, and was led to believe that the other 7 people were participants just like themselves. Each person in the room had to say clearly which comparison line was most alike the target line. The answer was made obvious. The real participant sat at the back of the room and gave their answer last. There were roughly 18 trials in total and the confederates gave the wrong answer on 12 trials. Asch was interested to see if the real participant would conform to the majority view, the experiment also had a controlled condition where there were no confederates. It was found that 32% of the participants who were placed in this situation conformed to the earlier incorrect responses. Over the 12 trials about 75% of participant’s conformed at least once and 25% never conformed. In the control group, with no pressure to conform, less than 1% of participants gave the wrong answer. It was therefore concluded that people either conform due to the fact that they want to fit in or because they believe that the group is better informed than they are. This study is criticised in that it is a biased sample as the participants were all male, all belonged to the same college and were all the same age. With this in mind and the fact that the sample size was small suggests that the data collected isn’t representative of the target population, as it cannot be generalised to female groups for example. Another issue is that the experiment is artificial meaning that it lacks or has very low ecological validity and…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another key factor in the understanding of the Bystander effect is pluralistic ignorance. Unlike social influence, where an individual conforms to the same opinion as that of a crowd, pluralistic ignorance is “a situation where no one believes, but everyone thinks that everyone believes” (Krech and Crutcheld). In other words, unpopular moral principles influence an individual because they are mistakenly thought to be the view of the majority of the group. The actual thoughts, actions, beliefs and norms of the crowd are misjudged by individuals. This leads the entire group of to act on certain principles because they believe those principles are held in high esteem by the rest of the group. This creates a false group atmosphere in which no one acts on his own principles, and instead obeys the principles he wrongly believe are important to the rest of the group.…

    • 3305 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So many people take social conformity for granted that not many bother to find out why it is such a powerful phenomenon and why so many people submit to this force without any resistance.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Interactionism is the real trick that individuals use images to shape their own perspectives about the world. Social interactionists concentrate how individuals use images to add to their perspectives of the world and to speak with each other. William Ogburn was a humanist who bolstered typical interactionism. Images individuals inside of society to build up an association with each other and to help us to interface with each different too. "They examine up close and personal interactionists; they take a gander at how individuals work out their connections and how they bode well out of life and their place in it" Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer were both sociologists who bolstered the Functional Analysis hypothesis. This hypothesis…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The anther in the article individuality vs conformity explains that there is a middle between being weird, trying to fit in with the rest, and being yourself in the middle. The anther supports her analysis by justifying how she thinks there is a middle to individuality and conformity. The anther argue in order so that when teen read this they are inspired to find a side. The author writes in a friendly style for her teen audience and other interested in the topic of the balance between…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bystander Effect has been used as an explanation for many events throughout history, but I believe that the true motivation behind bystander apathy is not the quantity of people, but the attitudes of those people. Humans mirror the emotions they see in others, and they follow the actions of the loudest person; if one neighbor had reacted to Kitty Genovese’s murder, it is very possible that the reactions of the other neighbors might have been more alarmed than they…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research into Conformity

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Research into conformity includes Sherif’s study conducted in 1935. The aims of his study were to study how people were influences by other people’s opinion, in their perception of the autokinetic effect. The Participants were seated in a dark room. Fifteen feet in front of the participants was a pinpoint of light that appears. Participants have to guess how far it moves. The dot doesn’t actually move but due to autokinetic effects, very small movements of the eyes make the light seem to move. Each participant developed their own personal answer, which varied considerably between individuals. Then the next day, three participants re-did the experiment, with two other participants that gave very different answers, to see if hearing other people’s answer would affect their answers. For example if a participant said it moved 6 inches when he was on his own. However when two other participants that said much less joined him, he says it moves much less than the day before. The first participants original response changes when in company of other people, this showing social influence. The…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories Of Conformity

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page

    disorder.” It is quite self explanatory, but incase you do not understand, Feys is basically saying that…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Bystander Effect

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page

    The bystander effect refers to the idea that people are less likely to offer help when other people are around. According to the theory, the larger amount of people that are present, the less likely people are to offer help (Cherry). Kitty Genovese was murdered in front of over thirty people and not a single person stepped in or even called the police. The bystander effect is to blame for her murder.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bystander Effect

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The bystander apathy, or bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon that happens when somebody doesn't offer help to a victim when other people are present. There is an inverse relationship between the number of bystanders and the probability of help. This implies that the likelihood of receiving help reduces with an increase in the number of bystanders. There are several explanations for the bystander effect. Although social psychologists have focused on two leading explanations: social influence and diffusion of responsibility. This paper discusses the psychology behind the bystander effects and its impacts on society. (Wikipedia Contributors)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays