Preview

Comparing Unitarianism And Kant's Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
516 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Unitarianism And Kant's Theories
Unitarianism and Kant’s theories both seem simple when just looking at them at their surfaces. Unitarianism is all about analyzing if an action is taken how much happiness or pleasure would be a result of that action, but it is really not that simple (pg 743). There are marginal humans who pleasure cannot be measured for. Then there is Kant’s theory which is about duty and following said duty. The duty that Kant talks about is a categorical imperative. Categorical imperative is assumed to always be the right choice given every situation, but that is not always the case. Thus, neither theory is very compelling because there are many example of each where they contradict themselves or do not make sense when the theories are applied. Unitarianism

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eth316 Week 1 Assignment

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All these theories have similarities between each other and the similarities are that the theories focuses on the good side of people, justify the good, and how people want to reach for excellence. On the other hand, the differences between these theories are that the theories start with morality and ethics. With deontology ethics discusses the person’s perseverance to the gratitude of doing the right action. This explains people who can reach the top of rightness on their own, which can endorse into a state of good society The virtue theory explains a person’s personality or characteristic such as taming excellence. Running to excellence is not something that can be hard quickly and easy. Thinking of what which choice is the best choice in a person’s life or someone else’s. Utilitarianism opens up with ethical and morality problems by explaining the sense of balance of good consequences over the bad ones. The morality relating…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humanistic theories concentrate in the present rather than the past or future. Also, decisions that individuals take reflect on their actions, and whether these actions are positive or negative there is a sense of responsibility for them (Allpsych online, n.d.). According to Carl Rogers a theorists who studied and concentrated on humanistic approach along with Maslow, every individual is different, but every single person is valuable to the environment where they live. Each individual has a purpose in life and their everyday goal is to grow and reach their fullest…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Beauty is an integral quality of the soul and God. If God is beautiful, the entire universe has to be beautiful. There can be nothing ugly in the universe.” (Hindu Janajagruti Samiti)¬¬…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay aims to argue the views of two different theorist, Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant, with regards to their views on moral worth of an action. The idea of good and bad creates heated debates among many, but this essay will successfully unravel the layers of Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism and his belief that all our motives are driven by pleasure and pain. While arguing Kant’s opposing argument that moral worth of an act revolves around democratic attitudes, and that moral truths are founded on reasons that is logical to all people. When one breaks down both theories, it occurs that Kant’s theory comes out to be the more sensible one in numerous aspects.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the theory which makes most sense is Jeremy Bentham’s theory of the hedonic calculus. However due to many decisions and actions having to be made in a matter of seconds, I can’t see it being practical in everyday life. The process of the hedonic calculus can take a matter of hours let alone minuets, and by following the process step-by step the decision that had to be made may have already passed. In relation to John mills theory of maximum pleasure and minimal pain, I strongly disagree that this is the correct answer for many ethical situations. Everyone’s pleasures are different and individual, for you to make a decision this can become a hindrance as it’s hard to define how to receive the maximum happiness from every individual. Using this theory in just a situation when it’s just your happiness involved however is a simple process, as you will know your preferences and what makes you happy. However when using this theory in a situation with more than one person it becomes a very complicated situation.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Confucianism is similar to Judaism in that the requirements of followers are nearly nonexistent, but the two religions differ in factors of origin and ideas on gender relations.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Confucianism vs. Hinduism

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During times of Han China and early India, Confucianism and Hinduism had similarities in actions of believers and differences in origin and ways to achieve higher social class.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume Versus Kant

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hume and Kant offered two differing views on morality. Hume's philosophy regarding moral theory came from the belief that reason alone can never cause action. Desire or thoughts cause action. Because reason alone can never cause action, morality is rooted in us and our perception of the world and what we want to gain from it. Virtue arises from acting on a desire to help others. Hume's moral theory is therefore a virtue-centered morality rather than the natural-law morality, which saw morality as coming from God. Kant's notion of morality stems from his notion of one universal moral law. This law is pertinent to all people and can be used at all times before carrying our actions According to Kant, you ought to act according to the maxim that is qualified for universal law giving; that is, you ought to act so that the maxim of your action may become a universal law. While Hume and Kant's moral theory differ dramatically, they share one quality and that is the fact that neither centers around the concept of God and his will.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the consequentialist theory, where the emphasis is on consequences, not intentions. The classical utilitarianism theoy of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham agreed that actions are judeged by the virtures of their consequences and also added that the pursuit and the production of happiness should be taken into consideration. This theory is summarized in three claims known as the consequentialist claim, the happiness claim and the objectivity claim. Claim one states that the actions are to be judged right or wrong solely by the virtue of their consequences. The second claim of happiness states that the only thing that matters when assessing the consequences of an action is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that is created, everything else being irrelevant. And finally, the third claim of objectivity when measuring the amount of happiness resulted by the consequence of an action, each person’s happiness should be counted as equally important. According to utilitarianism views we are to do whatever will increase the amount of happiness in the…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unitarian Universalism

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Unitarian Universalism can trace their roots back to Christian Protestantism. Unitarianism developed in the Common Era as a belief that all people would be saved. The first Unitarian Churches were established in sixteenth-century Transylvania. These Churches continue to worship today. Universalism was developed in America in the late 1700’s and was established in Boston. It was not until the early 1960’s did these separate religious groups Unitarian and Universalism united to form what is now Unitarian Universalism. The religion is very much theologically liberal and it is supported by the notion that a free and responsible search for truth and meaning is important.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most deeply felt, powerful and influential forces in today’s society is Religion. Religion in many societies shapes relationships, communities and even politics. Many turn to religion and believing in a godly being when in need of direction, strength and simply needing someone to vent to. Believing in a God during a difficult time can give individuals the hope and inner strength needed to make it through whatever situation they might be enduring. Religious faith also gives some people peace of mind when contemplating death, and also believing in the existence of an afterlife. A perpetuity with one’s savior seems to be a far greater privilege than life on earth, or anything one could theorize.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belief systems and religions around the world are often established in particular regions. The various beliefs of belief systems influence a society’s social, economic, and political aspects: belief systems of a society shape the way it functions, grows, and prospers – they form a society’s culture. Two exemplary paradigms that portray this ideology are Hinduism and Confucianism.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays