Preview

Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber
Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber were three historical sociologists. Their views have become world renown and have shaped many ways of interpreting the social structure of many modern societies. This essay will take a glimpse into the three sociologists’ ideals and expose the similarities and differences they may have. Karl Marx’s view of society was based around the economy. All other social structures according to Marx, such as religion, family values, and politics stem from the base, the economy. Religion played no part at all in Marx’s sociological views. He is known as an atheist. He believed that religion was nothing more than a burden on society. “The economy that forms from the means of production results in the division of labor and forms property” (Simon 1). Division of labor can be described as the way in which tasks are divided in a society. Certain people are assigned certain tasks which help to make sure that the social structure progresses smoothly. As society becomes more advanced, the division of labor becomes more advanced, because more tasks become necessary for society to stably exist. Therefore, in Marx’s opinion, the economy grows and advances society which fuels the division of labor that is necessary for harmonious living. Marx believed that social struggle was the main cause of social evolution. In a society there is always a group that is in some way oppressed. If we look back just a few hundred years we see this in slavery, and before that serfdom. So how does oppression promote social change? “It is the ruling economic class that determines the dominant ideology in a society… And it is class interest that the proletariat must oppose with revolution.”(Simon 2). The upper class in society rules over all the lower classes. When the oppression becomes an unbearable horror for the lower class, they must revolt, according to Marx. We saw this with both given

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    According to Karl Marx, religion is like a social institution as it is dependent upon the material and economic realities in a given society. It is apparently the ‘creature of productive forces,’ as Marx wrote, ‘The religious world is but the reflex of the real world.’ Marx believed that all religious, moral and political life that exists is rooted in economics. He stated that people have needs and desires (material and social etc) and society structures itself to meet those needs and desires. Due to this belief, this has given rise to a capitalist society, where the workers produce goods and services and rich industrialists and landowners profit from their labours.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx a Marxist sees religion as an illusion and that the phenomenon of religion is part of what Marx refers to as an alienation of people which causes conflict in society. He saw society as divided into two social classes with one dominating the other. And he saw religion as promoting inequalities and class conflict in society. He argues that religion is part of a dominant ideology that is the idea that religion is a tool used by the bourgeoisie (Ruling class) to convince the working class to accept low paid jobs and so exploits the working class, reproducing and reinforcing false consciousness.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed class struggles had existed throughout history and concluded that because of industrialization, society had dwindled down to two classes: the proletariat (laborers) and the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production). He viewed class struggles and industry as harmful to humanity because they allowed the bourgeoisie to exploit the proletariat.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs Gilman

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx advocated social reform for the proletariat (workers).The focus of Marx’s conflict theory is that by eliminating privilege, the overall welfare of the society can be increased. This would then create a true equality amongst members of a society. He argues that privileged groups are working to maintain their privileges, while the disadvantaged are constantly trying to attain more. The owners are making all the profit while the workers are, basically, trading their labor for bare necessities like food, shelter and clothing.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Emile Durkheim are widely recognized as the trinity of sociological theory. While these three sociologists were trailblazing social theorists who enhanced the study of human behavior and its relationship to social institutions, other, more contemporary scholars were just as innovative - one of those scholars being W. E. B. Du Bois.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel are the dominant classical voices when studying or analyzing the rise of civilization from a more cooperative, collective feudal social order to a modern capitalistic society. All four of these sociological philosophers contributed to the contemporary understanding of the nature of society and social change. Each of them eventually surmised that economic conditions directly influenced the relationship between individuals and their fellows, and individuals and their world. Although they had differences in their viewpoints, they were acutely concerned with the evolving market society and its effect on human interaction. Marx developed his concept of “alienation”, Durkheim expressed thoughts on social solidarity, Weber and Simmel emphasized how the emergence of capitalism affected the way people think, making the rational calculation of means and ends more ubiquitous and placing significant importance on rationalism and disenchantment. The outcome for the modern citizen was not naturally grounded in humanitarianism…

    • 3246 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three major sociological perspectives, functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism, are perception lenses which Sociologists utilize to answer the two basic questions in building theory; what issues should we study? And how should the facts be linked? Essentially, each perspective conceptualizes and analyzes how society influences people as well as how people can influence society. Functionalism or structural-functionalism is sociological perspective that analyzes society on a macro level.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In sociology, Marxism explains social change and movements. Developed by Karl Marx in the mid-1800s, Marxism holds that in a capitalist society the owners of the means of production oppress those who work in them. For example, the people who own large corporations exploit corporate employees, who perform unrewarding work for little pay. Resulting class conflict leads to social change in the form of revolution, as the workers overthrow the ruling class. In general, social change arises from class conflict. Marx thought classes would disappear in a communist…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second concept crucial to understanding Marx is the Manifesto of the Communist Party. The Manifesto of The Communist Party, explains the struggle within the classes and the survival of a class. “Hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle” (Marx p120). Karl Marx states that all the changes that occur in society, and political institutions are caused and shaped by a societal struggle of groups with similar economic problems.Marx begins by analyzing the Bourgeoisie class and explaining its struggle against the feudal society. The feudal society was dominated by a monarch or ruler, then came the nobles, knights and at the bottom the working class or peasants. This class system was not working due to the classes ending up stacked,…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Along with Marx and Durkheim, Marx Weber (1864-1920) is one of the most influential classic sociologists. Weber was born in Berlin, Germany. He enrolled in the University of Heidelberg in his eighteen, and attended the University of Berlin later. Even though he received education in law and history, Weber was fascinated with social sciences after his professorship. In his early academic life, Weber became an important scholar in economic and legal realm. Weber did not divert his attention from economics to the field of sociology until he underwent a serious psychological breakdown. The majority of Weber’s sociological works, including the Protestant Work Ethic, was written after this mental breakdown…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Durkheim, Emile, “The Rules of Sociological Method”. Trans. W.D. Halls. New York: Free Press, 1982. Pp. 97-107.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx viewed religion as a system of beliefs that was a feature of a class divided society. Religion creates a false idea of community in which we are all equal in the eyes of God. The state fills this need by creating an illusion of a community as citizens, all equal in the eyes of the law. In Marx’s view, religion operates in order to be used by the ruling class to justify the economic equalities faced by the poor as something that is outside of their control and God given. Marx saw religion as an opiate caused by oppression, which was brought about by economic and social injustices. Religion is seen as an opiate due to the belief in post-mortem rewards and punishments. Religion does not fix the causes of peoples pain but rather it helps…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology is based on two frameworks, namely structure-agency and conflict-consensus. These frameworks center around three founders of sociology, Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber. This essay will attempt to demonstrate which author explains sociology within which framework. The structure used for this essay will be a point-by-point structure. This essay will start off with structure, move on to agency and then to conflict and lastly conclude with consensus.…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx Durkheim Weber

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    6. Critically examine the specific methods used by Marx, Durkheim, Weber for the analysis of social forces and relations in modern society.…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim has proved critical in the study and development of theories relating to the sociology of work. They are widely considered the ‘founding fathers’ of study in this field. These highly regarded sociologists are often described as three separate pillars who amalgamate to form a triangle of classical theories that delve deep into the intricacies surrounding the sociology of work. While Durkheim invested his efforts into the concepts of social solidarity, integration and control, Marx concerned himself with the ideas of social fragmentation, disintegration and conflict. In addition, Weber developed his theory regarding rationality and bureaucracy. (Grint & Nixon, 2015)…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics