Preview

Comparing Socrates And Machiavelli's Prince

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Socrates And Machiavelli's Prince
In the societies of Socrates, Hobbes’s Leviathan, and Machiavelli’s Prince, individuals were naïve. Individuals believed in a power to rule them, rather than standing up and thinking for themselves. While Machiavelli and Hobbes believed in instilling fear into their citizens, Socrates believed in equality and justice. Socrates would disagree with Machiavelli and Hobbes’ societies because they were run by the same government that Socrates was fighting against.
In Machiavelli’s Prince, the Prince acts as the ruling power over naïve individuals. The Prince believes that individuals are easily persuadable, but it is hard to hold them to a persuasion. “The character of people varies, and it is easy to persuade them of a thing, but difficult to keep them in that persuasion. And so it is necessary to order things so that when they no longer believe, they can be made to believe by force. For example, if tax collectors come to collect taxes and are upsetting the people, the Prince may kill the tax collector. Although it is cruel and wrong to murder, the Prince will claim the act was out of care for the people. The Prince would point the finger at the tax collectors and claim that he was the one that was wrong. Meanwhile, all the money the tax collectors are paying is actually going to the Prince. Individual’s in the Prince’s society naively manipulated into thinking that the Prince is acting out of a loving place …show more content…
Snowden leaked classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) and sent classified documents to be published that revealed that the NSA had surveillance systems that allowed them to watch everyone at all times. Snowden, knowing he would most likely be tried for treason and possibly put to death, sought asylum in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden: Former CIA Employee
    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Edward Snowden: Former CIA Employee

    Edward Snowden is a former CIA employee and also a former contractor for the US government. Ed Snowden in 2013, leaked very classified information including the surveillance program ran by the government. One of the things this surveillance program did was to spy on and hunt terrorists, but also to record and log all phone calls, videos call and texts messages to where they could access this stuff at anytime. Another thing that they logged was emails and messages from facebook and tons of others. When Snowden leaked this information he flew to Russia where he was granted asylum for one year and then got it extended to where he can stay there until 2020. To many people Snowden is listed as a traitor, whistleblower, and many other names, but…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Attitude Toward Mankind
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli's Attitude Toward Mankind

    Overall, Machiavelli shows that in order to be an effective prince, one must disregard the morality of one’s actions in certain times for the welfare of the state. This strong belief shows that Machiavelli’s best interests are in the state and not in the general population. Because he…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione
    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's View Of The Prince By Vincent Barnett
    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page

    Machiavelli's View Of The Prince By Vincent Barnett

    In this part of the section by Vincent Barnett, he simplifies what Machiavelli's main point was writing "The Prince". Throughout this entire section Barnett shows the readers that Machiavelli was only describing what all rulers do an how the end justifies the means. He also tells us that a good ruler would balance how much his citizens feared and loved him. In this section it shows how modern rulers act like the rulers they had many years ago.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Virtue And Fortune In Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Virtue And Fortune In Machiavelli's The Prince

    Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli outlines the characteristics needed to be a strong and admirable leader. He explains that personal characteristics such as courage and compassion, both being aspects of virtue, will earn him praise. However, he feels that this expectation is unrealistic and a prince’s first job is to protect the state, and having “bad” characteristics is sometimes necessary to reach that goal. That being said, in order to protect the state a prince may have to act unscrupulously at times which he believes will bring good fortune in the long run. Machiavelli believes that no matter how a prince acts, whether moral or not, virtue and fortune are the two most influential forces in politics and he shows how, throughout history, they have affected different people in powerful positions. Using the lessons learned by previous people of great political power, Machiavelli points out virtues and fortunes present in the particular cases, while then explaining his beliefs and solutions to the examples from the past. Virtue and fortune go hand in hand throughout this guide. One…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden Argument
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Edward Snowden Argument

    Edward Snowden was a hot topic in the news in 2013 after he released classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the media. This leak contained information about global surveillance performed by the United States, which involved monitoring email, tracking cell phones, and logging phone calls. Not only did this action force him into asylum overseas to avoid arrest, but it ultimately caused an uproar in the media and amongst the American public. The controversy surrounding Snowden involves the rights of the public vs. the surveillance programs performed by the U.S. While many condemn Snowden for betraying the national security of his country, many applaud him for exposing the…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden Research Paper
    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward Snowden Research Paper

    In the summer of 2013, a system administrator released classified information regarding the National Security Agency’s wiretapping and surveillance of the American people and the leaders of foreign powers. Hailed as a hero by some and a traitor by others, Edward Snowden fled to Russia after revealing the NSA’s secret operations in an interview with The Guardian, a UK-based news source, in Hong Kong. These acts were condemned by the United States government who aimed to extradite Snowden on the charges of theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward Snowden

    Edward Snowden is a twenty-nine year old man who betrayed the U.S. government. He is now in hiding in Hong Kong. Edward revealed the mass collection of government eavesdropping. The government was collecting cell phone data. Not only was the National Security Agency collecting data from U.S. citizens, but they were also collecting data from other people around the world. Edward Snowden gained access to the information through his job with the N.S.A. “After only three months, Snowden began collecting top-secret documents regarding NSA domestic surveillance practices, which he found disturbing”(Edward Snowden.biography). There is a large debate over whether or not this act was heroic or that of a traitor. The answer is clear: Edward Snowden did our country a favor. His acts were a great public service.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edward Snowden

    One often finds that standing up and working in favor of the greater good usually results in negative consequences. Edward Snowden encountered this crossroad while working as a technical contractor for the NSA and the CIA. While working at the NSA's Oahu office, Snowden began noticing various government policies and techniques that the NSA was using in order to spy on American citizens. Through phone calls and internet use, information was gathered about various citizens without their consent. After only three months of working for the NSA, Snowden began copying and leaking the disturbing secret documents regarding the NSA’s surveillance practices. The documents contained information regarding the invasion of privacy of millions of Americans from the NSA's various domestic programs such as PRISM. Snowden then fled to Hong Kong in order to escape potential trouble with the law after newspapers began printing the leaked documents, many of which detailed the invasive spying practices against American citizens. This leads to the controversial matter of deciding whether or not Snowden is a whistleblower deserving recognition, or a traitor against his country. Those who support him, consider him a hero protecting the people while others view him as a traitor against America.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Machiavelli
    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes vs Machiavelli

    Philosophy is an academic practice that dives into the study of the nature of things including knowledge, and existence. Its context of the norms of society and the reasons behind these norms are studied by philosophers whom include Thomas Hobbes and Nicolas Machiavelli. These two recognized philosophical minds have delved into the concept of a ruling government body, including governments and royalty. Hobbes penned the famous Leviathan while Machiavelli wrote the controversial The Prince. Both of these books include a deep look into powerful people and their ways of keeping peace and functionality in their given societies. Since the two came to their conclusions through different means, it is easy to see where the two would disagree; one wrote based on a logical standpoint of what should help a society run smoothly, and the other wrote based on what he actually observed and situations he studied. However, even though there are differences of writing between these two philosophers, there are both similarities and differences between their observations and conclusions about governors and the governed. While both Hobbes and Machiavelli believe in a very pessimistic view of society as a whole, their opinions differ in relation to the rulers’ treatment of their people.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparative Essay: Ancients vs Modern Thinkers
    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparative Essay: Ancients vs Modern Thinkers

    Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke, distinguished themselves from the ideas and philosophies of the ancients by their own exploration of the individualist, the responsibilities of the state and government and the nature of the two. But what really distinguished these modern thinkers from those of the ancients, is their ability to take the teachings of the ancients and evolve it with the society that is very much alike to our modern day world. As many political theorists may know, Plato and Aristotle is generally seen as an inspirational and transitional figure between the ancient and the modern political philosophers. Unlike that of the ancients, Machiavelli was not concerned that a government should be an living moral force that was capable of inspiring its people. In Machiavelli's The Prince, he advocates that order is more important than virtue and thus, morality is in many ways impractical. The Prince is an blueprint created by Machiavelli for those who seek to obtain and maintain power in ways that the ancient works did not . Opposite to those of the ancients, Machiavelli's work could be characterized as an down-to-earth, realistic and self-interested text, which is the direct opposite…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics