Preview

Comparing Kant And Moral Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
161 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Kant And Moral Law
If someone is carrying out an act but they fear the consequences, then they are not acting in accordance with moral law. If someone is carrying out an act but they are only looking for a reward, then they are also not acing in accordance with moral law. Kant says, “Like a jewel, it would still shine by itself, as something that has its full worth in itself” (Kant 10). Kant is suggesting that a moral act is good in itself; it does not need to have rewards or consequences surrounding it to be worth something. It is a good act simply because it is a good act. Reasonable morality motivates people act morally without the influences of consequences or rewards. This is very important because you must do the ethical thing regardless of the consequences

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What part does happiness play in determining the morality of an act in a situation? Can a concept that ties morality to the search of happiness truly be rational? What of the opposite? Is it possible to view every situation with objectivity, never taking into account an emotion (like happiness)? The questions above concern themselves with the part of the central tenets of the ethical views of two very important philosophers, respectfully: John Mill and Immanuel Kant. The ethical theories that these two philosophers laid out clash with each other in fundamental ways, from how reason was defined, to the role that “happiness” played in determining the ethical choice in a moral dilemma. In the following pages, I will attempt to present and discuss the theories of Kant and Mill, pointing out what I perceive as weakness in said theories, as well as the possible strengths of each system.…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this analytical paper I’ll be analyzing a scenario about a five year old girl who is in renal failure and is in need of a kidney transplant. In this the father is the only one compatible with her, but he does not want to donate his kidney to save her life. The scenario will be analyzed through the deontological/Kantian and the consequentialist/utilitarian viewpoints in ethical decision making. It’ll also be analyzed by deciding which perspective would be relevant and a discussion of what I as a doctor would do following the ethical view point of my choice.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory begins from the starting point of the good will. In assessing the moral worth on an action we must focus not on the consequences of results of the action, but on the agent’s will ( the motivation of conducting an action is really important).…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having described Kant’s examples of acts done out of duty and desire, I will know discuss the conclusion he makes about moral worth using these examples. Kant makes the conclusion that in order for a person’s actions to have moral worth they must be done without desire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kantianism and Utilitarianism have different ways to decide if an act is right or wrong. Kantianism believes humans are rational beings and therefore are capable of choosing rational behaviors without the need to sacrifice others. Utilitarianism on the other hand believes that individuals should do whatever needed to produce the utmost happiness they can achieve. While both have the same end goal, Kantianism seems to be more ethical for it does not support using others to achieve happiness. Utilitarianism allows this with the theory that it is for one’s own greater good than it is morally correct to do. This applies to circumstances such as breaking the law and using others for person gain. If it induces happiness, then it would be considered…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Absolute Moral Law

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant proposes an ethical system in which an individual forms maxim, subjective principles of action, from which the principle of the categorical imperative is derived. This categorical imperative is the supreme moral law, and according to Kant, it is absolute. For example, a maxim like “I must not lie” might be extrapolated into the imperative “Do not lie” according to Kant’s formulation. However, the concept of absolute moral law faces a problem in a case in which multiple moral laws run counter to each other.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s moral theory claims everyone has the desire to follow a maxim or a sense of duty. Unlike Kant’s moral theory, utilitarianism belief is for everyone to adopt a set of rules for the best consequences for the majority of people. The key difference between Kant’s moral theory and rule utilitarianism is utilitarianism focuses on the consequences, long term and short term, while Kant’s theory focuses on the rational agent or the purity of the will. Each action in Kant’s point of view is aligned with duty while utilitarianism believes sacrifice of the few is the absolute…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Duty Ethics Kant

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this paper I will first go into a detailed review of Kant’s second formulation of the first categorical imperative. I will explain in depth what the second formulation means and how Kant came to take on a philosophical position such as this. Next, I will describe the two most pertinent and grounded critiques that Feldman has regarding the second formulation. Then I will defend Kant’s formulation from these critiques. Finally I will summarize the above information and conclude the essay.…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Kant's moral theory makes many great points about fairness and equality, the negatives of the theory outweigh the positives. Kant’s moral theory would never be able to function in today’s society. His theory is based solely on always fulfilling your moral duty. Which would be impossible since once someone told a lie or showed emotion everything would fall apart. Due to the fact that everyone wouldn’t trust anyone anymore which wouldn’t end up well.…

    • 811 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) discussed many ethical systems and reasonings. Some were based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. In Kant's eyes, reason is directly correlated with morals and ideals. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for appropriateness or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. A moral act is an act done for the "right" reasons. Kant would argue that to make a promise for the wrong reason is not moral you might as well not make the promise. You must follow a certain code in order to find truth behind your actions. Kant believed that you should treat everyone with value, dignity, and respect.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays