Preview

Comparing Imperial Rome And Mauryan/Gupta India

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Imperial Rome And Mauryan/Gupta India
The most significant difference between Imperial Rome and Mauryan/Gupta India was the structure of their governments, yet both empires were heavily influenced by religion and both had similar causes of their eventual downfalls.

Imperial Rome and Maurya India were both run as centralized systems of bureaucracy because it kept their empires strong and more organized. The Gupta India, however, was decentralized and maintained their strong central government with an emperor and by strictly enforcing the caste system and other Hindu beliefs. Not having a centralized government made it increasingly difficult to keep the empire strong and clear of invasions from neighboring regions. However, Rome, contained an empire and a senate, which allowed
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han China vs. Imperial Rome Essay Example
    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han China vs. Imperial Rome Essay Example

    Han China chose the middle path between the two diverse methods of government and pursued the policies of administrative centralization and imperial expansion. In contrast, Imperial Rome centralized political and military power which coincided with the preservation of traditional republican offices and form of government. The Han government believed that the network of political alliances in the Zhou Dynasty caused chaos between states, but the tightly woven Qin dynasty diminished the reason for imperial family members the sustain the empire. Han China was preferably divided into administrative districts that were governed by officials. These officials reached the emperor’s expectations, but allowed his authority over them while the bureaucrats implied his policies. Although, original forms of governing were adjusted in both places; the military responded directly to the emperor or ruler to avoid the problems caused by generals commanding personal armies. Imperial Rome progressed, from a previous dictatorship, by fashioning a centralized political government and unifying military power. Imperial Rome, in comparison to Han china, handled governmental functions with more concern. The Roman Emperor accrued copious amounts of power for himself and took complete responsibility during these times.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Comparison of Han China and India Essay Example
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of Han China and India Essay Example

    Mauryan/Gupta India from 320 B.C.E. to 550 C.E. had similar as well as different methods of political control with that of Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E. in the sense that both used culture to justify social inequality supported with the idea of rising in social status and the use of religion to help with political control. The differences were more seen by the twos’ organization in political control as well as the language role in the midst of the civilizations.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    comparing and contrasting Imperial Rome and Han China
    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages

    comparing and contrasting Imperial Rome and Han China

    Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire
    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire

    The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. The Romans were attacked by Germanic tribes and Han China was attacked by the Huns. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them. The Han and the Roman Empires failing due to nomadic invaders is similar to the fall of the Gupta because one of the main reasons they fell was because of nomadic invaders conquering them and then splitting them up into regional kingdoms.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The comparison of the han and roman falls
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The comparison of the han and roman falls

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome Comparison
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han and Rome Comparison

    Though both empires had similar causes for declines, they had different political systems that caused the empires to rise to power. The Han dynasty was built on Legalism, while the Roman empire was built on a republic government. Legalism consisted of strict obedience of the equally applied law, which kept everyone, no matter political, economic or social status, in check. Because the system of the law ran the state, it created a stable political system even when the ruler was weak. Under legalism, success became based on skill and not contacts, so there were more qualified people in office. In the Roman Republic government, the Assembly (the common man) voted each year to elect two new members of the Senate ( the noble and wealthy man). This created a separation of powers that kept internal conflicts at bay. This allowed for Rome to focus more on expansions.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome
    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome

    One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han vs Mauryan
    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Han vs Mauryan

    The social aspects of both empires had a lot in common because gender-roles, family and relationships were looked at in the same way. During the Mauryan/Gupta as well as the Han Dynasty, women were subservient to men and families relied on patriarchs. In both empires there were close knit villages, landowners had power and merchants took second role in the social system. However, the two had their differences. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire put emphasis on caste while the Han Dynasty was based on a social structure. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire’s caste system was an important social bond and a crucial part of the political structure. At the top of the system were the priests, then the warriors and rulers, followed by the merchants, skilled traders and minor officials, after that were the unskilled workers and finally the “untouchables”, who were outcastes and barely considered as people. The strict caste system provided a network of rules by which people could regulate their lives and activities and also promoted public order which helped politically. The caste system was so strictly enforced that no one could intermarry or be moved up a class so it determined where you would be for all your life. The caste system also played a role in religion which encouraged the use of a caste system rather than people look down upon it. On the other hand, the Han Dynasty relied on a highly structured system of classes. The most powerful was the emperor, the nobles and the military officers, who made up the first class. Next came the farmers and peasants who made up the second tier. Lastly, the third class was made up of merchants, commoners and servants. This system…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Empires Rome and China
    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Comparing Empires Rome and China

    Consolidating the Roman and Chinese Empires 1. both empires defined themselves in universal terms 2. both invested heavily in public works 3. both claimed supernatural sanctions a. deceased Roman emperors as gods (imperial cult) i. persecution of Christians for nonparticipation in cult b. Chinese emperor as Son of Heaven i. rule by Mandate of Heaven ii. dependent on just rule iii. heavy ritual duties to maintain relationship between earth and heaven iv. moral government spelled out by writings of Confucius and his followers The Han Dynasty was heir to the Qin state that had unified China in 221 BCE. The first ruler of the Qin established the title of “emperor.” The power of a Chinese emperor was absolute; however, he was subject to various checks on his authority by both high officials and imperial family members. The Romans practiced emperor worship solely in the case of dead emperors. In addition, only certain emperors were accorded divine honors, and always after death. In other parts of the Empire, however, local customs merged with Roman ones. In Egypt, for instance, emperor worship was practiced more widely. This was because the Roman office of emperor combined with the Egyptian notion as Pharaohas-sun-god. Chinese emperors were not considered divine beings. The emperor was called the “Son of Heaven” and was responsible for conducting sacrifices to both Heaven and Earth. The word “Heaven” referred more or less to what we would call “nature”: the succession of day and night, and the motions of the stars and planets. During the first millennium BCE, the concept of the “Mandate of Heaven” was applied. If an emperor oppressed the people, Heaven could withdraw a dynasty’s right to govern.…

    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rome and han
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    rome and han

    rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Decline Of The Han And Roman Empires
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Decline Of The Han And Roman Empires

    While both empires had many great rulers who paved the way for greatness there were some people in power that, because of there greediness, caused the downfall of their empire. The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty both fell because of their corrupt leaders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Techniques of Administration in Classical Empires
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Techniques of Administration in Classical Empires

    The Persians and Greeks heavily influenced the Romans in their management of imperial administration. During the Qin dynasty, ideas and attributes of those empires may have diffused to the Han dynasty. Like Persia and the Qin dynasty, Imperial Rome and Han dynasty both had standardized currency, weights, measurements, and system of centralized government with a strong ruler. The emperor was the central authority with definite powers. In imperial Rome, Augustus reorganized the military system and created a new standing army with commanders who owed allegiance directly to the emperor and integrated them in the government. Similarly in Han China, the emperor positioned the Grand Commandant, was the irregularly posted commander of the military and then regent during the Western Han period. He owed direct allegiance to the emperor of Han. The government system of both empires was the central government with smaller regional…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han Dynasty Essay Example
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Han Dynasty Essay Example

    | MAURYAN-an agrarian economy, big on agriculture and industry and tradeGUPTA-Based on agriculture and trade, textile industry etc.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Krishan Kumar's Greece And Rome In The British Empire
    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Krishan Kumar's Greece And Rome In The British Empire

    One author that touches on the relationship between Great Britain and these two empires is Krishan Kumar. Kumar’s Greece and Rome in the British Empire: Contrasting Role Models compares ways that the British Empire mirrors the models of Greece and Rome. Kumar argues that the Greek Empire model is described by its autonomous colonies, while the Roman Empire model is defined by its widespread dominion over colonies. Due to Britain's quick growth and immensity, it was originally compared to Rome; however, as Britain developed, it revealed elements of both models. Britain had a hands off approach approach to most of its colonies but in India, Britain maintained a strong control of its colony. Kumar points out that after the separation from the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics