Preview

Comparing Howard Becker And Max Weber's Labeling Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
747 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Howard Becker And Max Weber's Labeling Theory
Labeling theory is a sociological concept that considers how people are labeled in society and the later impacts of this labeling on their self-identity and behavior. Furthermore, it looks at the concept of deviance - behavior that is different to the normal or accepted standards of society (The Free Dictionary), and highlights the “role of government agencies, and social processes in general, in the creation of deviance and crime”(Paternoster, R & Bachman, R 2013).

In her online lesson on labeling theory (Study.com), Erin Long-Crowell suggests that, “labeling others is common in our society,” and further states, “labeling theory proposes deviance is socially constructed through reaction instead of action.” Put simply, it is the reaction to a
…show more content…
Interaction theory further argues it is not the social background of people that leads to them becoming criminals, but that they become criminals because they are so labeled by authorities, which creates a stigma or negative label that changes their self-identity. In effect the application of the label often creates a self-fulfilling prophecy, and the person labeled begins to act in a manner that reflects the perception of their label.

This can lead to a cycle of public labeling, resultant rejection from social groups, increased deviance (ie: crime), official treatment of deviance (ie: arrest) and resulting difficulty job seeking and the emergence of a deviant career by joining an organized deviant group (Becker’s “Master Status” theory) (ReviseSociology, 2016). An example is the juvenile who is labeled a delinquent because he comes from a low-income background and is caught stealing, who then continues to steal because he knows that this is the expected behavior of a juvenile

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The labelling theory is a micro interactionist approach, this is because it focuses on how individuals construct the social world through face-face interactions. It recognises the concept of the ‘procedural self’ where ones identity is continuously constructed and recognised in interaction with significant others, this results in the individual’s behaviour, including that related to crime and deviance.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The interactionist Jock Young conducted a participant observation in London on marijuana usage by hippies. In the past hippie usage of marijuana was minor and relatively insignificant. Over time, the police started to see the hippies as dirty and scruffy, thus giving them a negative label. Due to this police reaction, the hippies united, feeling different from the rest of society. They then retreated into small closed groups, cut off from society and deviant norms and values developed. They were treated as outsiders and chose to accentuate and express their differences by becoming more and more unconventional. Thus, a deviant career developed. Interactionists would argue that because the police had labelled them so negatively they had caused more crime. Jock Young called this deviancy amplification. Before, the hippies had not been causing any trouble; they weren’t hurting or bothering anyone, until the police labelled them. Once they had been given this label, they couldn’t help but fulfil their master status.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This theory also explains how labeling these indivudal and them becoming an outcast can affect the behaviors. This theory is to point out how social rproccesses of labeling and treating someoneas criminally deviant actually fosters deviant behavior and has a negative repercussion for that person because other are likely to be bias toward the offender because of the…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    howard beckers theroy

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Howard Becker’s labeling theory starts off by identifying the deviant. Once you get caught doing something, you are identified and labeled for it; it can either be formal as labeled under the law or informal as in labeled with in family and friends. For example, I had two very good friends in high school, Serafin and Brian. They were best buds and always did everything together. Like many teenagers in high school they started to experiment with drugs. Like every other day they would both go smoke weed and get high in the alley afterschool. No one ever walked through the alley unless you were doing drugs or something but that day the police were roaming around the block because a robber had broke into someone’s house, Serafin and Brian happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The cops drove through the alley and had seen both of them smoking, their first reaction was to run but where? When there wasn’t anywhere to run, it was a dead end. So they quickly jumped tried to jump the fence while Brian jumped the fence successfully and got to runaway, Serafin wasn’t so fortunate and ended up getting his pants stuck to the fence. As soon as Serafin got arrested he was immediately identified and labeled. As for Brian he didn’t get caught and never got labeled even though he was there and performing the same deviant actions as Serafin.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In societies where there are strong social controls, it limits the ability of the criminal to engage in criminal behavior. Without these social controls, the criminal elements will be successful and influence members of the society. Another aspect of the personal crime theory is that people who live in communities that lack the necessary social controls experience strain when they cannot reach the same success as other members of society. The strain that is met by the citizen turns to anger or frustration is alleviated by criminal behavior that gets the person closer to his or her…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although, it is unlikely that this approach would hold true for explaining why an adult with no background of juvenile delinquency would suddenly be involved in adult crime organizations. Members of criminal organizations will vary in age but “it is rare that one joins or begins criminal associations as an adult” and that the majority of “gang membership begins during youth and adolescence” (Britz et al., 2006, p. 16). However, there are some flaws in the applicability of Sutherland’s theory for explaining why people become involved in criminal gangs. One such flaw is the claim that one is deviant through the “excess of deviant over conventional contacts” (Thio, 2010, p. 24). It fails to explain why some people who are surrounded by nondeviant influences become deviant and for people who are surrounded by deviance never engage in deviant behavior. The theory analyzes how a person could learn from his or her surroundings but fails to explain “the reasons for why they make delinquent choices” (Church et al., 2009, p. 11). A better explanation of how deviance occurs is through…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other perspectives tend to focus on a smaller demographic or that it relies on specific scenarios to push people towards criminal behavior. Merton’s theory fails to address the class dilemmas as people from lower class households may not be able to achieve their cultural goals though institutionalized means. Cohen’s theory is not strong enough on its own to explain the numerous homicides in inner-city areas as he claims about lower class delinquency is only relevant to young males who join gangs. Cloward and Ohlin’s theory is pertains only to cases of people becoming criminals in response to numerous of illegitimate opportunities. Messner and Rosenfeld’s theory is only relevant to crime in regards to people following the American dream and other similar goals. Agnew’s theory can cover different races, genders, and ethnic groups which it also explains why crimes like homicide is concentrated in specific areas as the source of the problem is due to people being unable to adapt to those…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examining Theory Paper

    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Social process theory, also known as interactionist perspectives, suggest that everyone has the potential to violate the law. Social process theory holds that criminal behavior is learned through interactions with others and the socialization process occurring as the result of group membership is seen as the primary route through which learning is occur. Some of these groups can involve family, peers, work groups, and reference groups. Social process theorist suggest that individuals who have weak stakes in conformity are more likely to be influenced by the social processes and conditional experiences that lead to criminal acts. This specific theory looks at the interactions an individual makes within a group. Social process theory can be incorporated with a juvenile in a broken home, a first time offender serving year plus, or someone simply trying to fit in at school. More so in the pre-adult years, just about every interaction we have with anyone or group can be chalked up to a new learning experience. Some of the different types of social process theory are social…

    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal career is composed of re-offenses due to lack of social integration, exclusion from mainstream structures and in some cases renegation of the societal norms. The deviant is theorized to perceive no other choice but further deviance because the label attached to their discovery turns them into untrustworthy or even dangerous individuals. The social response only creates a backlash that manifests as acceptance of the label, retreatment from society or…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many theories that attempt to explain criminal behavior. Social theories indicate that interaction with other individuals and environment are factors that contribute to criminal behavior. Many argue that social factors alone cannot be the only cause to criminal behavior, but peer pressure and rationalization are powerful tools of behavior modification.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labeling Theory

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ++A theory that involves deviance that can help reduce crime rate is the Labeling Theory. Aaron Cicourel, in his 1976 study, illustrates the labeling theory by investigating the relationship between the Californian police officers and the people whom they were more likely to arrest. Cicourel found that the police were more likely to arrest a group of people that fit the criteria of poor education, poor social status, and minority members. The police would interact with this group of people, that were suited to this list, more harshly than middle-class offenders, who were warned and then let go. The unequal treatment of the people within the society show how the view of specific acts affects their place, however, realists argue that interactionists…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Deviance and Race

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Conley, the labeling theory is the belief that individuals subconsciously notice how others see or label them, and their reactions to those labels, over time, form the basis of their self-identity. In other words, labeling theory is the idea that society determines the distinction between what is deviant and what is not deviant. This theory states that conforming members of society, especially individuals with power, impose significant labels on certain behaviors, constructing them to be deviant.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social research suggest that labeling people make them feel negatively about themselves , and they have a low self image. Sometimes people except labels of other, so it is hard for them to change this label. Some people feel that deviance can be a set of characteristics of a group, but it is not. Ihis is the process that happen between deviants and non-deviants. The three typology of deviance, and the first one is pure deviance. Pure deviance the person gets what is coming to them, and society has correctly appraised the situation because of bad behavior.Falsely accused is not guilty, but they get labeled deviant. They have to go through the process of conviction, and they have negative connotations about it. Secret deviant is behavior not noticed,this violates the norms of society. Every one who experience negative labeling self image is effected. Pure deviance, Falsely accused, and Secret devian self image are affected by being convicted. They are usually considered a menace to society, so most people won't even think twice to give these convicted felons a job, so most of the times these negative connotations will make them go back to jail. They can’t get a job with these kind of negative labels on them, so if they did not do it at first, they might do it…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays