Preview

Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
226 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony
Brutus and Mark Antony both had speeches and they both had similarities and differed in different ways.
One of the speeches was more persuasive than the other. Brutus's speech was more honorable, and Antony's speech was more Persuasive.

In the tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus best appeals to Logic. Brutus best appeals to Logic as he is trying to persuade that killing caesar was for the best. Brutus states "Hear me for my cause, and be silent that you may hear." ( Shakespeare 3:2) Brutus wants the citizens to listen to is reasoning and what he has to say, he's anxious to explain hmself.

Mark Antony's Speech best appeals to emotion , he gets the reader more into their feelings. Antony once states " My hear is in the coffic
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    JuliusCaesarEssayLogosPathosEthos
    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages

    JuliusCaesarEssayLogosPathosEthos

    Mark Antony speech was more effective because he reminded the plebeians that Julius Caesar was not ambitious due to that fact he rejected the crown three times. Brutus tells the plebeians the reasoning behind why he were to kill Caesar - that if he were not to kill Caesar, then everyone would die as slaves. Then he said “But, as he was ambitious, I slew him. “(III,ii, 28). In other words, Brutus says the reasoning behind why he killed Caesar was due to the fact that Caesar was ambitious. However, when Mark Antony…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Anthony Use Ethos In A Persuasive Speech
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Anthony Use Ethos In A Persuasive Speech

    From what I observed in the speeches, Anthony is the more persuasive speaker. Anthony used ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech while Brutus only used pathos and logos, Anthony also connected with the crowd showing he had the same emotions as them while Brutus only challenged the crowd. Ethos is a persuasive speech tactic that speakers use when persuading the audience by using ethics. It focuses on the ethics of either the speaker or the audience.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    brutus vs antony
    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    brutus vs antony

    Discuss the attention paid (or not paid) to omens, nightmares, and other supernatural events. What do the various responses to these phenomena show about the struggle between fate and free will in Julius Caesar? Can the play’s tragedies be attributed to the characters’ failure to read the omens properly, or do the omens merely presage the inevitable?…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

    The citizens of Rome were moved by both Brutus's and Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral. Persuasion can be ingenious in plentiful ways, Brutus and Antony swept the crowd in their own ways. However, by looking at the ethos, pathos, and logos in both Brutus's and Antony's speeches, Antony can be seen as more persuasive.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Rhetorical Strategies Of Brutus And Antony
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison Of Rhetorical Strategies Of Brutus And Antony

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Brutus Like Caesar
    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Is Brutus Like Caesar

    Does Marcus Brutus like Caesar? What does Brutus think of Caesar’s rise to power? .…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast Julius Ceasar essay
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast Julius Ceasar essay

    The leader of Rome is dead, and two men have completely different opinions as to what has happened to him. Brutus, his right hand man, says that he had to be killed due to his excessive ambition. While Antony states that he was brutally murdered by the people who called themselves his friends. But only one of the two stood out, they were so believable and convincing that it was hard to believe anyone other than him. And this speech was given by Antony. He gave an incredibly convincing speech, making the people of Rome completely look past the words of Brutus by sparking different emotions in them. But at the same time he was very careful and precise with his words which helped to protect him from the conspirators who murdered Caesar.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Oh Rhetorics

    The tone of voice Brutus used in his speech was subjective and also persuasive. Brutus wanted the citizens to know that he did the right thing by killing Caesar. Brutus specifically states that he killed Caesar for the love of Rome. Brutus also states that Caesar was ambitious, which is used as a negative connotation in the speech. In the speech, Brutus tries to gain the citizens respect while explaining himself. Brutus displayed strong emotions, which is portrayed throughout the whole poem. Brutus wanted the citizens to agree that killing Caesar was a good thing and not a mistake. Also in the speech, Brutus used a lot of rhetorical questions which also helped establish a serious tone.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appeal and Antony
    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Appeal and Antony

    What examples of appeals to reason did Brutus use? What examples did Antony use? Who handled the appeal to reason better? Explain your answer. Brutus makes a speech that appeals to reason . but his appeal to reason is surpassed by Antony's cleverness who uses the emotions of the crowd . Antony suggests that Brutus and his fellow conspirators and not the honorable men they say they are .…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    Antony says some keywords, to make the crowd to believe that he loved him as much as they did. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” Antony also repeats words to indicate to the crowd that he is sarcastic. “For Brutus says he is ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man.” Antony uses specific words to turn the crowd onto his side.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Caesar start

    Antony's funeral speech was much more effective because his use of nnsmsnsnmsmsmdmd ndmkdmd mxdm mxmmd. Mmcmcmmmd mcmmdmc mxmxmmc ckkckxmmd kfdlmmdm mddlmc k. Jdjdn nsnnnd nndndn jdmxm nxnmxn . Bdnxmx mfmcm nmmdPathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar

    It is often argued that Antony has the better speech. It is true that Antony did a good job persuading the crowd to go on a rampage. However, Antony is in the wrong, Antony shouldn’t be riling up the crowd to go on a rampage. He should be gathering them as one and uniting them in this time of peril. Brutus had the better speech because he did was right.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brutus And Antony's Speech Comparison
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus And Antony's Speech Comparison

    The overlook of Brutus’s and Antony’s speeches are not similar at all in my eyes. Brutus’s speech was trying to show the citizens that there was no harm in killing Julius Caesar, which there was. Brutus partially manipulates the citizens by saying how much he really loved Caesar, but loved the city of Rome even more. The citizens were moved by his speech because of how protected they felt by his words. Brutus talks good of Caesar, saying how there are tears for his love, joy for his fortune, honor for his bravery, but then death for his ambition. He shows the crowd how it was for the better of them. On the other hand, Antony’s speech rowled up the citizens more than they were passionate about Brutus’s speech. Antony put more of an emotion in his speech to the people. He showed how incredible of a man Caesar was and even showed proof of his will. Obviously the crowd easily changed their opinions about the whole situation and Antony knew just what to say and do. Antony was calm about the whole speech even when the crowd was begging for him to read Caesar’s will. Antony blamed Caesar's murder…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics