Preview

Comparing and Contrasting Political Ideologies: Robert Kaplan vs. Noam Chomsky

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing and Contrasting Political Ideologies: Robert Kaplan vs. Noam Chomsky
CGW4U
Isabel Juergensen
Mr. Neufeld
27/10/13

Comparing and Contrasting Political Ideologies
Robert Kaplan vs. Noam Chomsky

1. Chomsky Thesis Outline: The main points within Noam Chomsky 's thesis revolve around his idealistic values and his concept of ' 'Elemental Morality ' '. When describing his concept of ' 'Elemental Morality ' ' Chomsky explains that if people cannot rise to the level that has them apply the same standards to themselves that they apply to others, they have no right to talk about what 's right and wrong. A common example of this hypocrisy has been executed by the United States-whom Chomsky claims to be a ' ' leading terrorist state ' '- in an attempt to justify their country’s terrorist acts. In other words, when they do it it 's terrorism, but when we do it its counterterrorism. When looking at the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the war aims were claimed to be to overthrow the country 's brutal dictator Saddam Hussein, in which they succeeded. The U.S. has a history of using the fight for democracy as a justification for overthrowing regimes. However, Chomsky argues that the best way to overthrow power centers and brutal regimes is to do so from within with support of internal democratic organizations. Ironically the very regimes that are being fought against have commonly been found to have support from the U.S.: South Eastern Turkey (the Kurds), Nicaragua in the 1980s, Israel, and Afghanistan during the 1980s to name a few. In Chomsky 's eyes all of these atrocities are all equally immoral simply because they are all atrocities. Chomsky explains that if we want to stop comparing atrocities, the easiest way is to stop participating in them and try to find other ways to deal with them. As a result, as long as people are able to think for themselves and free themselves from 'the right wing imperialists ', then they can pose the same elementary morality, levels of violence and



Bibliography: Chomsky, Noam. 9-11. New York: Seven Stories, 2001. 40-55. Print. Kaplan, Robert D. "Interventionism 's Realistic Future." Washington Post (2006): 1-2. Print Mendes, Errol. "The Cost of Non-intervention in Syria." The Cost of Non-intervention in Syria. Ottawa Citizen, 26 Aug. 2013. Web. 27 Oct. 2013. ""The Reasons for My Concern"" Interview by Celia Jakubowicz. Noam Chomsky and U.S. Foreign Policy. Third World Traveller, n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2013. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phyllis Bennis and Noam Chomsky, Before and After: US Foreign Policy and the September 11th Crisis (Olive Grove, 2002)…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Perloff, James. "Trial Run For Interventionism." The New American 22 Aug. 2012: n. pag. Web. 15 Dec. 2014.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that a person’s fate can be closely attributed to his or her own efforts is…

    • 1444 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DeConde, A., Burns, R. D., Logevall, F., & Ketz, L. B. (Eds.). (2002). Encyclopedia of American foreign policy (2nd ed.) (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Scribner 's.O’Malley, M. (1999)…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tactical definition of terrorism in Coady’s essay is the organized use of violence to target non-combatants for political purposes. Non-combatants are any person’s that do not directly coherence with the agents of aggression. The just war tradition tells us the conditions under which it can be right to resort to war (jus ad bellum) and to guide us in the permissible methods by which we should wage a legitimate war (jus in bello). Given the just war tradition and the tactical definition of terrorism, terrorism is morrally wrong. In addition, the supreme emergency must be accounted for. The definition of supreme emergency allows for the violation of the normal immunity of terrorism to be permissible in warfare, though only with a heavy burden of remorse. However, the theory of supreme emergency suffers from grave defects whether it is offered as an exemption on behalf of a state, or some less established political community, or a group claiming to represent either.Therefore, all forms of terrorism and their exemptions are morally wrong.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article speaks about the recent new that a coalition of seventy partners, which includes the United States, has gotten involved in the Syrian Uprising by pledging to donate millions of dollars and communications equipment to the rebel groups in Syria who are opposing Assad's rule. This move by the U.S and other Western powers symbolizes the start of a new type of involvement in Syria, perhaps a more direct one. This move by these powers have caused many Syrian rebels and people observing all over the world to question whether diplomacy and/or sanction methods can truly end the Syrian regime's oppression of their people. This more direct shift of action by the Western and Arab allies of the Syrian rebels toward balancing the military balance in Syria is dangerous regionally because the crisis there is similar to a proxy conflict, which could possibly aggravate sectarian tensions. The Syrian rebel army is currently overmatched by the regime forces in terms of weapons.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Funding for the Military

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Cost of Israel to US Taxpayers. (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2012, from If Americans Knew: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stats/cost_of_israel.html…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Truth about Torture,” Charles Krauthammer critically analyzes the John McCain, an individual with tremendous moral influence who was tortured by the North Vietnamese, amendment. This amendment would prohibit all forms of torture from being executed on war prisoners of America. In response, Krauthammer states that in certain scenarios, torture is not “just permissible, but also morally required.” He divides the war prisoners into the following three classifications: ordinary soldiers arrested on the battlefield, captured terrorists, and finally, terrorists who possess information. With regards to the ordinary soldiers, McCain’s amendment is justified because although these war prisoners are on the opposite side of the conflict, they are nonetheless lawful fighters who committed no crime. On the contrary, Krauthammer believes that the terrorists are not worthy of the same protection and privileges since they intend to harm innocent citizens.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The results of implementing ideology can be a matter of life and death. Ideologies of racial superiority can be seen in the slave trade and the Holocaust, while the idea of laissez-faire leaves the poor without help. Current foreign policy ideology has risked lives, both American and international; it has led to a policy of interventionism and, at times, left the borders of the United States inadequately protected. There is a limited choice in public policy concerning foreign affairs, as evident in the situation of Vietnam, where policymakers discussed a choice between total bombing of Indochina and limited bombing while offering no choice for withdrawal. As those in charge of society—politicians, corporate executives, media owners—can dominate our ideas, they are be secure in their power. The ideas they perpetuate are not accepted by all, but are believed widely and strongly enough to dominate our thinking, while any dissident ideas are challenged and rebuked. The process of ideological selection in which certain orthodox ideas are encouraged, financed, and pushed forward by the most powerful mechanisms of our culture produces only “safe” ideas which don’t threaten established wealth or power. Current foreign policy ideologies do not threaten the might of the military, but instead help increase its…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non-Intervention Essay

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Matas, David. "Debate: Non-interventionism." 24 2010. International Debate Education Association, Online Posting to Debatepedia. Web. 15 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War on Terror Research Paper

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bibliography: Bilmes, L. (2006, February). The economic costs of the iraq war: An appraisal three…

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our view, as a threshold matter, humanitarian intervention that occurs without the consent of the relevant government can be justified only in the face of ongoing or imminent genocide, or comparable mass slaughter or loss of life. To state the obvious, war is dangerous. In theory it can be surgical, but the reality is often highly destructive, with a risk of enormous bloodshed. Only large-scale murder, we believe, can justify the death, destruction, and disorder that so often are inherent in war and its aftermath. Other forms of tyranny are deplorable and worth working intensively to end, but they do not in our view…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics