Preview

Compare and contrast two main sociological theories of crime and deviance.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and contrast two main sociological theories of crime and deviance.
Compare and contrast the two main sociological theories of crime and deviance.

Deviance and crime are wide-ranging terms used by sociologists to refer to behavior that varies, in some way, from a social norm. Cultural Norms are society's propensity towards certain ideals; their aversion from others; and their standard, ritualistic practices. Essentially the 'norm' is a summation of typical activities and beliefs of group of people. This essay will evaluate the sociological theories associated with crime and deviance and to compare and contrast these main theories. And find links between these theories to today’s society. There are various Sociological deviance theories, including Structuralist: why do some people break the rules? , Marxists: who makes the rules, and who benefits from their enforcement? , and Interactionist: How did this person become processed (labeled) as a deviant? Sociology asserts that deviance is problematic, yet essential and intrinsic to any conception of Social Order. It is problematic because it disrupts but is essential because it defines the confines of our shared reality.
According to sociologist , William Graham Sumner, deviance is a violation of established contextual, cultural, or social norms, whether folkways, mores, or codified law (1906). It can be as minor as picking one’s nose in public or as major as committing murder. Although the word “deviance” has a negative connotation in everyday language, sociologists recognize that deviance is not necessarily bad (Schoepflin 2011). In fact, from a structural functionalist perspective, one of the positive contributions of deviance is that it fosters social change. For example, during the U.S. civil rights movement, Rosa Parks violated social norms when she refused to move to the ‘black section” of the bus, and the Little Rock Nine broke customs of segregation to attend an Arkansas public school.
Crime as cited by Mustapha is any action that breaks the law of the land and is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Moral Panic

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to discuss the idea of moral panic in the social construction of deviance it is important that these three concepts be first defined. Only then is it possible to initiate or conduct an interrogation of the links and connections between the two main inseparable constructs, which are moral panic, and deviance. In brief deviance is defined as “violations of the norms of society” (Thompson, 2004: 2). This means that deviance is an anomie that threatens to degenerate the consensually agreed upon behaviours, values, and beliefs that society shares and deems appropriate. As acceptable ways of behaviour are converted to societal norms, and mores; deviance is simultaneously constructed by society as it defines those behaviours it collectively negatively perceives, to be taboo, folk-devilish and thereby being deviant. Hence deviance threatens the moral fibre of a society. Moral panic was originally defined by Cohen (1972:9) to be a phenomenon whereby moral entrepreneurs feed into public sensationalism of deviant behaviour, indiscriminate of its magnitude and nature. This means that moral panic is the exaggerated response by the public towards the perpetrators of deviant behaviour.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Chapter 9

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both norms and the way people define rule breaking involve social power 
The Functions of Deviance: Structural-Functional Analysis…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pease (1994) said, ‘Crime comprises those actions which are deemed so damaging to the interest of the community that the state determines that it must take a direct role in identifying and acting against the criminal.’ Downes and Rock (1998) said ‘Deviance may be considered as banned or controlled behaviour which is likely to attract punishment or disproval.’ In short, ‘Deviance’ is a asocial construct that can change across time and place and ‘Crime’ is an action that breaks the law.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. The theoretical perspective that views deviance as “a common part of human existence, with positive as well as negative consequences for social stability”…

    • 383 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, as Downes and Rock point out, 'ambiguity' is clearly the whole issue in the analysis of crime and deviance: the authors state that it is socially recognised the difficulty of identifying situations or people as deviant and it all starts conforming to the group reaction (2004:5). That is not only about the criminal subject: assumed that sociological behaviour is performance, most of people tend to behave conforming to the situation and, then, to that series of attitudes that are considered moral. So is deviance just a conforming to the wrong side? Most of criminals and deviants are, indeed, influenced by peers despite mass media depict criminals as solitary weirdos (Krohm, 2009:401-402). Erickson, cited in Gibbs (1966:11) formulate an interesting (and prettily sociological) consideration stating that the study of crime and deviance becomes critical focusing on 'the social audience' that refers some individuals as being deviant in order to gain control since it is necessary to react against these people. That is the basis of the criminal law but, since some behaviours do not conform with civil norms, what about informal norms? Stipulating these rules and then conforming to them is the making-of the social culture, which according to Downes and Rock substantially consists in 'traditional ways of solving problems' (2003:145-146) and these problems refer to all those issues and situations that are not considered ordinary, usual and normal. Subsequently, the people who consider that side as the 'outside' are the same that behave affected by moral panic, nowadays generally spread by the mass media; meanwhile, in the Middle Age deviants for example were the left-hand writer or the witches and, in the last century, they were the homosexuals or the mods and the rockers. What makes the former ones ‘more normal’ than the latter…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Deviance in sociological context describes actions or behaviors that violate cultural norms including formally-enacted rules (e.g., crime) as well as informal violations of social norms.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The murder of Linda Andersen by her two teenage daughters (Bob Mitchell, “The class project” (2014) is a clear example of what started off as not breaking the law, but, after further review and supported speculation was found that the girls did in fact break the law by murdering their mother for illicit greed, motivated by visions of champagne holidays and expanded luxury. Their deviance, however, has been used in a narrow sense (Quinney, 1965; Robertson and Taylor, 1973, pp. 61-62). Rather than being seen as a particular type of deviance, this crime has been distinguished from deviance; when this distinction is made, the term deviance takes on a somewhat different meaning from a broad category of sanctionable behavior (Piers Beirne and James Messerschmidt, (2012). Deviant Behavior). Sociologically speaking, many crimes can be regarded as deviant forms of behavior, that is, behaviors that are some way abnormal. A crime may be defined as a violation of formal norms (that is, laws), whereas deviance may be defined as a violation of informal norms which may or may not be against the law (Ellen G. Cohn, (2014). Florida International University; The overlap between deviance and crime)…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This theory meshes some aspects from both the social disorganization theory and the strain theory. The main premise of the cultural deviance theory is that conformity to the prevailing cultural norms of lower class society causes crime. The lower class subculture has its own set of values, rules, and beliefs that clash with the mainstream values of the middle-class and wealthy. Criminality is a manifestation of conformity to lower class subculture values. Members of the working and lower class commit crimes of different variations as they respond to the cultural norms of their own class in an effort to deal with adjustments of the socioeconomic classes.…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Subcultural theories are used as an attempt to understand the cause of crime and deviance, they state that people who commit crime share different values from the mass law abiding members of society. They argue that these crime-committing people do not completely oppose to mainstream values; rather they have amended certain values forming ‘subcultures’.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the contribution of the Marxist theory to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance.…

    • 909 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime and Deviance

    • 4093 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Every society is guided by laws and regulations, therefore, breaking of the law is known as crime or deviance. Crime and deviance will be defined with examples and how what is crime and deviance depend on culture and society will be analysed. Thus, a criminal act in one place is a norm in another place. Crime and Deviance changes as the society evolve, there were some activities that were classified as crime or deviance historically in England but are no longer crime and vice versa some activities that were not crime historically but are now crime will be explained. Functionalists, Emile Durkheim gave his views on crime that it is inherent a society and a society without crime is unhealthy and explained how crime is functional but failed to explain the causes of crime. Robert Merton in contrast to Durkheim explained the causes of crime and described the source of ‘strain to anomie’ as a difference between the America’s common goal of ‘money success’ and lack of resources for every member to achieve the common goal which led to four types of deviance. However, he has his limitations as well as strengths. In covering Merton’s limitations Albert Cohen’s subcultural theory was introduced, his theory only focuses on how educational failure played a major part in working class crime as gang delinquency. Cloward and Ohlin criticised Cohen that he did not cover all of Merton’s limitations; hence, Cloward and Ohlin explained the three different types of deviance. The strengths and limitations of the four theories will be highlighted. Marxists criticism of functionalist theory and the similarities and differences between both theories will be highlighted. Marxist theory is based on conflict contrary to functionalism that is based on consensus. Marxist explained that…

    • 4093 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the ways in which sociologists theorize deviance is through the control theory. This theory was first pioneered by Travis Hirschi in 1969. The control theory suggests that a person who does commit serious crimes is free of any emotional, social feelings and for those that do not commit crimes are able to control themselves to not commit crimes and behave in an acceptable manner in society without being a danger to others. Basically, this theory emphasizes that a person from birth is capable of acting in criminal behaviour, but the social factors affect a person from committing criminal acts or not.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory seeks to in-depth and better understand deviance by centering on social patterns and structures that emerge as either groups or individuals react to conditions in which in the real sense…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human deviance is just as characteristic of society as is conformity. Every human group, no matter how consistent stable and well integrated, must somehow respond to such problems as drug use, mental illness, violence, theft, and sexual misconduct, as well as to other similarly difficult behaviors. Problems of deviance inevitably are defined as being a real or perceived threat to the basic core values of the society. For whatever reasons, some persons act, at times at least, in…

    • 8806 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics