Compare And Contrast Tungkol And Holmes
Rizzoli did autopsy testing on the corpses of the victims, but Holmes did not have any type of technology to do tests on bodies. An autopsy is the examination of a dead body of a dead person and determines how they were killed. In addition, blood samples and DNA samples are taken for testing. Unfortunately, Holmes was unable to do this.
Rizzoli tried using violence while interrogating suspects as opposed to Holmes who was calm and collected while talking to potential suspects.
Unlike Holmes, Rizzoli does not make minute examinations of the crime scene or anything related to the crime.
Like other crime TV shows, Rizzoli also has a medical examiner (Isles) that looks at the bodies
Similarities:
They use forensic evidence from the crime. Holmes uses evidence such as the footprint of a hound while Rizzoli uses the evidence of a stun gun mark on a body.
Both detectives use reason and deduction from clues. For example, Holmes uses clues from Dr. Mortimer’s stick to infer that he is a country practitioner, had a spaniel, and was friendly with clients. …show more content…
In “See One, Do One, Teach One,” Rizzoli looks at the man posed on the couch with his throat precisely slit. This crime was similar to a previous crime she solved. She uses her prior knowledge and remembers that a criminal (“The Surgeon”) also did the same thing to his victims. Rizzoli recalls releasing the information about the other crime to the public except for one thing: the fact that the victim had a stun gun mark on his body. As a result, she inferred that The Surgeon was training another person to do the same crimes. In addition, in The Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes knew that Watson had found his retreat. This is because as Holmes was within twenty paces of the door, he saw a stub of a cigarette marked Bradley, Oxford Street. Holmes recollected that Watson’s tobacconist labeled his cigarettes in the same manner. Therefore, he came to the conclusion that Watson was
Rizzoli tried using violence while interrogating suspects as opposed to Holmes who was calm and collected while talking to potential suspects.
Unlike Holmes, Rizzoli does not make minute examinations of the crime scene or anything related to the crime.
Like other crime TV shows, Rizzoli also has a medical examiner (Isles) that looks at the bodies
Similarities:
They use forensic evidence from the crime. Holmes uses evidence such as the footprint of a hound while Rizzoli uses the evidence of a stun gun mark on a body.
Both detectives use reason and deduction from clues. For example, Holmes uses clues from Dr. Mortimer’s stick to infer that he is a country practitioner, had a spaniel, and was friendly with clients. …show more content…
In “See One, Do One, Teach One,” Rizzoli looks at the man posed on the couch with his throat precisely slit. This crime was similar to a previous crime she solved. She uses her prior knowledge and remembers that a criminal (“The Surgeon”) also did the same thing to his victims. Rizzoli recalls releasing the information about the other crime to the public except for one thing: the fact that the victim had a stun gun mark on his body. As a result, she inferred that The Surgeon was training another person to do the same crimes. In addition, in The Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes knew that Watson had found his retreat. This is because as Holmes was within twenty paces of the door, he saw a stub of a cigarette marked Bradley, Oxford Street. Holmes recollected that Watson’s tobacconist labeled his cigarettes in the same manner. Therefore, he came to the conclusion that Watson was