Preview

Compare And Contrast The Alien And Sedition Act Of 1918

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
167 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Alien And Sedition Act Of 1918
The United States restricted civil liberties during and after the first World War by passing two acts; the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918.

The Espionage Act of 1917 was passed with the purpose to prohibit any interference with military operations (Links to an external site.) or recruitment (Links to an external site.), to prevent insubordination in the military, and to prevent the support of the United States enemies during wartime. Punishments under this law include jail and death.

The Sedition Act of 1918 was an extension of the Espionage Act of 1917. This extension was made to cover a broader range of offenses, mostly about speech and the expression of opinions that make the government or the war effort look bad. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alien Acts Dbq Analysis

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    President Adams’s response to the French foreign threat was to pass a series of laws that included the repression of domestic protest. The four bills are known as the Alien and Sedition Acts that were collectively passed by the Federalist Congress and President Adams in 1789. There were three Alien Acts. The first, being the Alien Enemies Law, which granted the president extraordinary wartime powers. The president was able to detain or deport citizens of the nations that the United States were at war with. Also those who the president thought were acting in a suspicious manner. This legislation never went into effect because President Adams never declared a war. The second act, the Alien law, gave power to the president to banish any foreigners…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As time surges on so does the bitterness between countries. 1797 marks a commemorative year as the "XYZ Affair" later launched a series of acts that created tension throughout the country. The Alien and Sedation Acts of 1798 not only oppressed the freedom of aliens wanting to become citizens in the country, but broaden conflicts between the Federalist and Republican parties, and the beginnings of a break in the government.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alien and Sedition acts were passed by the Federalists in the United States congress in 1798, and they were signed into the law by President John Adams. The alien and sedition acts were four laws, one of which was called the Naturalization Act, another was the Alien Act, the two others were the Alien Enemies Act, and the Sedition Act. The four acts were passed in order to try controlling the activities of the foreigners in the United States during impending war.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians, politicians, experts, believe that the Espionage Act of 1917 was one of the must controversial laws passed. This law was passed on June 15, 1917 shortly after the United States entered world war I. The reason why many people believe this law was so controversial, is that many argue that it directly affected the constitutional right of freedom of speech. The reason is because this act originally prohibited any attempt to interfere with military operations, to support United States enemies during wartime, it also prohibited promoting insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, refusal in the military, and or to interfere with military recruitment. The punishment for braking this law could be punishable by death…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legislation outlawed the distribution of possibly radical material from the mail and the vocal critique of the US government, Constitution, or military (Civil Liberties 2). The APA mobilised citizen “agents” to read mail, spy on neighbours, and report suspicious actions. These actions, both legislative and domestic, targeted the small, non-violent groups of labor leaders, Socialists, radicals, dissidents, and minorities, particularly German Americans (American History 628). Teutophobia was so out of hand that one minister was lynched for praying in German (Civil Liberties 2). While it was important to raise support for an unpopular but necessary war, the factions that opposed the war were never large, or violent enough to prevent the United States from going to war, as evidenced by the United States flat-out joining the war. Thus, the violence and violation of their First Amendment rights as citizens of the United States was not justifiable given what little power these groups actually…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sedition Act of 1918 allowed punishment towards the individuals who expressed opinions deemed hostile to the U.S government, flag, or military. In other words, it made it illegal to “willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of the Government of the United States” of the things “necessary or essential to the prosecution of the war.” On August 1918, a handful of anarchists, including Jacob Abrams, dropped leaflets off a building on the Lower East Side which criticized President Wilson and the U.S military intervention against Russia’s Bolshevik government, and called for general workers to protest Wilson’s policy. Authorities convicted Abrams for violating the Sedition…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They countered it by adopting a narrow definition of the freedoms, drawn from English law. Here, the freedoms only existed prior to expression of an idea (Neuman 52). After one had spoken words or published information, people could however still be punished by government if proven to have defamed the government or king. Proponents argued that speech could naturally qualify to be seditious irrespective of the amount of sincerity or truth in it. Limitation of speech could also be justified basing on the priorities of the government at the time. For instance, according to the sedition act, there has to be a scandalous, false, or malicious element in the writing or speech.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Espionage Act was passed in 1917. It made it illegal to say anything negative about the military or to discourage people to join the draft. It also did not let people print certain things against the war. This directly violated the First Amendment rights of freedom of press and speech. The main problem with this act that related to the CPI was that the CPI could boast about the great army and the committee depicted war as a happy time, that would provide many fun adventures, but people could not give the opposite side of the story, stating that it was dangerous, and many people would come back scarred for life. Not only could people not give this information, but if they dared to do so, they…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the United States was just becoming involved in the First World War, fatal circumstances began to occur not only with other countries, but within the U.S. itself. When domestic and foreign spies began to appear inside the United States, law enforcements became much stricter, and new acts/laws began to develop. Of these laws and acts, two of the greatest were the Espionage and Sedition Acts. The Espionage Act was mainly to prevent U.S citizens attempting to harm the United States by spying and aiding other countries in the war, whereas the Sedition Act had labeled disloyalty, profane, and abusive language against the Constitution, the U.S. government, the American uniform, or the flag a federal offense. These two acts significantly impacted Eugene Debs, Edward Snowden, and Bradley Manning, because it limited their level of open opinion. Each man’s case related to either freedom of speech or the verbal abuse of the United States, both of which were prohibited under the Espionage and Sedition Acts. Although these two acts were created to protect the United States from great harm during World War I, they were unjust because they were severely violating the first amendment, or the freedom of speech.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People would consider the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional because they did not followed they freedom established in the Bill of Rights. According to the Constitution, the President had no authority to imprison or deport aliens he considered dangerous for the nation’s security, because the power is shared between the state government and the national government. The Bill of Rights allows people to have their right to speech and the President couldn’t prison people who doesn’t agree with his laws, publish scandalous or malicious writings against him. All criminal prosecutions have the right to speedy and public trial. Any person can’t be discriminated by their religion or be prohibited of practicing it, just like aliens can’t be considerate…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1798 the Alien and Sedition act was made. This act was completely against the constitution in all ways that you look at it. People might disagree because they did not want to many people coming into the country that could hurt it. I do agree with this but not every person that come to the country didn’t want to do bad things. Some people come to live a new lifestyle because their old country was not the best. This is why this act was one of the worst ones and should have never been made.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If the Sedition Act was still in effect, people would no longer be able to publicize their opinions on government affairs if they don’t agree with them and if they did they would get punished which violates the freedom of petition. People would be afraid and no longer be able to petition the government to make changes and the voices of people would be silenced.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sedition Act of 1798, being a Federal Act directly violates the 1st and 10th Constitutional Amendment. The Freedom of Speech and the Freedom of Expression along with the enlisted power for individual States and its people for executing federal laws must lie first and foremost. Carrying out the violations of the Sedation Act by Congress did go without resistance or recognition, most likely due solely to Federalists’ purposeful neglect and overlooking. Writers and journalists from which whom wrote of and spoke of their opinion were rashly prosecuted, even if some cases were of a very innocuous matter.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act Essay

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, the act is a threat to civil liberties because it destroys portions of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. Those amendment rights include freedom of speech and assembly; unreasonable search and seizure; right to due process of law; speedy trial; and excessive cruel and unusual punishments. Furthermore, the act gives government authorities to tap into any phones of citizens or monitor everyday uses of the internet. The scariest part is that any Americans can be labeled as domestic terrorists if they engage in even normal criminal acts. On the other hand, the USA FREEDOM Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet-collection and Online Monitoring Act) was passed to impose limits on bulk collection of telecommunication data on citizens by intelligence agencies. The act extended the Patriot Act provision that involves roving wiretaps and lone wolf…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays