Preview

Compare And Contrast Prosecution Vs Defense

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Prosecution Vs Defense
university of phoenix | Prosecution Versus Defense | CJS/220 | | | 2/9/2011 |

| |

Prosecution versus Defense
The role of defense attorneys and prosecutors are both similar yet different in a few ways. For starters, they are both attorneys with different goals and responsibilities. The prosecutor's goal and commitment is to society as a whole even though he or she may indeed be representing a person. His or her goal is to prove the accused to be guilty and seek punishment for the crime that he or she has committed. The defense attorney on the other hand represents the defendant and is committed to making sure that his or her client receives a fair trial based on the due process. The prosecutor represents the state while

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Criminal law- involves an offense where the entire community is harmed and the remedy is a fine or imprisonment for the offender. The responsibility of pursuing a violation of criminal law rests with the state. Where as, civil law does not directly harm a community and the remedy for a violation of civil law is to sue the violator and order the violator to pay damages. A person may be charged criminally and sued civilly.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    prosecutor, a state's attorney general, and as a judge on state trial and appellate courts…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their main goal is to obtain the complete dismissal of the charges brought against their client or obtain a not guilty ruling by the jury of their peers or the judge. The criminal justice system is a 3 part system which includes the judge and jury, the prosecutor, and the defence lawyer. Each part of the system is there in order to prevent abuse of power, and make sure each person receives a fair and equal trial. If the accused did not have a defense attorney they would have noone to fight for them and their rights, this would cause the system to be even more corrupt and unbalanced, as every person presented to the court would already be guilty because they have no one to show the contradicting evidence in their…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The domain of prosecutors has been extended to provide greater authority. An example of domain expansion of the prosecutors is improving police-prosecutors relationships. Truthfully, police officers and prosecutors are looked at as the bad guys in the eyes of the public. They are both to serve justice, even though they have different perspectives on the law. For example, the police officers consider a case to be closed when the suspect is arrest, but the prosecutor needs obtain more information and evidence to win the case in court. Prosecutors depend off of the police to obtain a conviction; this all depends on how the police officers investigate and the quality of their arrests. Although both police officers and prosecutors have sought strategies…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the prosecutor and the defense attorney are competent of handling ample discretion within their proper duties. The prosecutor could be considered to have appropriate capabilities at their availability which feature fewer restrictions compared to the discretional capabilities of the defense attorney. The prosecutor handles abundant discretion in deciding whether to originally go after a case and immediately charge the accused. They may find what to offer the defense when a plea bargain is settled and have the power to drop and re-file charges when it is appropriate to do so. Prosecutors may be engaged in horizontal prosecution or where there are several prosecutors may be assigned to the case throughout each legal stage, or vertical prosecution, where there will be a single prosecutor following the case through each legal stage (Meyer & Grant, 2003).…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    accused of an action? They make sure that the legal rights are fair so that the client is not…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecutors are typically lawyers who possess a law degree, and are recognized as legal professionals by the court in which they intend to represent the state. They usually only become involved in a criminal case once a suspect has been identified and charges need to be filed. They are typically employed by an office of the government, with safeguards in place to ensure such an office can successfully pursue the prosecution of government officials. Often, multiple offices exist in a single country, especially those countries with federal governments where sovereignty has been bifurcated or devolved in some way.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please accept this letter as a complaint of employment discrimination based on gender by Alice Bennett. Please also accept this letter as an appearance by Marcia Robinson of Auburn University Legal Services on behalf of Mrs. Alice Bennett.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecutors job is to prosecute those responsible for the crimes and to punish the guilty ones within the confines of the criminal justice system. A plea bargain is a tool that the prosecutor can use for the purpose of speeding up the judicial process without violating the rights of those accused. Not only can plea bargaining minimize the amount of time it takes to get a criminal to the…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Work Groups

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The role of the prosecutor is to protect the government or community’s best interests. This being said the prosecutor must take cases based on the facts of each case and the evidence provided. If the prosecutor did not do this and took every case under less stringent requirements it could leave many cases going to trial with a lack of evidence and lead to a waste of court room time and money for attempting a trial with no evidence to convince a jury. This could also lead to innocent people being convicted on no evidence simply because of a well-spoken lawyer. This being said, if the prosecutors were more stringent about the cases they took and the minimum amount of evidence was greater it may lead to criminals getting away with more crimes and never being brought to trial because of a lack of concrete evidence.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between trial courts and appellate courts are complex, but are two important entities necessary within the justice system. Trial courts grant the initial pass for a civil or criminal proceeding to have a voice in court. Appellate courts have authority to reassess findings decided on at trial court level. There are four essential parts amidst trial and appellate courts: purpose, evidence, juries, and judges (Ehow.com, 2012).…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecutor and plaintiff are the individuals who present a case against the defendant or accused. They must present evidence, witnesses, and testimony to the jury to prove guilt or innocence. While the prosecutor and plaintiff are against the defendant the defense counsel is representation appointed for or by the defendant…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prosecutors are the people who go against the defense, so they are the ones that put people in jail. The prosecutors are really hard on the people that commit a crime. In the article “How We Misunderstand And Mass Incarceration,” district attorneys have seen their political options expand, and this has encouraged them to remain tough on crime even as crime has fallen”(Gopnik). This illustrates how the system is politically influenced because if the district attorneys did not have a political agenda then they wouldn't be so hard on the punishment. The attorneys just want to make their big break and put people in jail, they do not think about the person they think about their career. This ties back to the Central Park Five case which was a very big case, where the prosecutor put harsh punishments on the five boys who didn't even commit the crime because he wanted to close this big case that would help his career. If prosecutors would just think about the person who committed a crime then there would be a lot of people without long jail. If the prosecutor in the Central Park Five case thought about those boys he would've realized he had the wrong boys. Thus, prosecutors should be so hard on the punishment of a…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Incarceration Process

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page

    Your Criminal Defense attorney is there to handle the criminal case and to provide guidance and support in the event that you or your loved one is incarcerated. However, here are a few key issues that should be discussed in depth. Let's take a closer look at hose issues.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to convict a criminal, prosecutors are required to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The most common criminal defenses fall under two categories, excuse and justification. An excuse is when a person admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she can’t be held responsible because there was no criminal content. Some excuses used in court today are; mental disorder, infancy (age), mistake of fact, mistake of law and automatism. In justification defenses, the accused admits to wrongdoing but argues that he or she should be freed from culpability or assessed reduced liability for the crime due to mitigating circumstances surrounding offense. These defenses are factors that excuse a competent person from liability for…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays