Preview

Compare And Contrast North And South Political System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast North And South Political System
The North and South of the U.S. were always very different. The North was materialistic, individualistic, and had great faith in progress, while the South was traditional and valued honor and family loyalty. Southerners relied on slavery and farming to support their economy, whereas the North relied on factories, which prospered quickly. Because the South was slower than the North in creating a “unified market economy and a regional transportation network”, they relied financially on the North. Slavery was also an unsteady income, so the South wanted to grow and improve slavery. The cultures were so different, which caused many arguments between the two regions. The Civil War was inevitable due to the North’s and South’s differing ideologies of economic systems, slavery, and the role of the government. The fundamental ideologies of the North and South were constant, although the focus shifted over time.
The members of the First Party System, the Jeffersonians and the Industrialists, conflicted over economic systems that were unique to the North and South. The Southern
…show more content…
due to the dramatic differences in beliefs between the North and the South. While the North during the First Party System wanted an industrial economy, the South wanted an agricultural economy. During the Second Party System the North wanted the government to have more control and use it to minimize slavery and to build infrastructure. However, the South wanted the people to have more power and influence over slavery in order for them to maintain their way of life. During this period Congress and the Supreme Court made decisions that favored southern interests over northern interests. In the course of the Third Party System the North wanted to abolish slavery, while the South wanted it to grow. The result of the election of 1860 was the first time the U.S. had such severe differences that it forced the Union to part, which paved the way for the bloody

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The main leaders for the two parties were Henry Clay for the Whigs and Andrew Jackson for the Democrats. These two men and their respective parties held very different economic beliefs. One difference between the two was, the…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One Pager US C10

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The early political battles between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists and the winner take all electoral system helped cause the two party system. After the Democratic Party developed with no major opposition, it was imminent that another party would sprout up soon to oppose the viewpoints of the Democratic Party. In 1834, a group of congressman eventually banded together to oppose Andrew Jackson and created the Whig Party.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South's economy was based off of slavery unlike the North. The South's economy was based off of slavery unlike the North. Compromises was made to keep the amount of slave states and free states equal, but many of them have been overridden to keep slavery going in new territories (Doc 1). This could start a war because the North did not want slavery so if the South is breaking rules to keep slavery it is not going to be okay. The South did many things to make slavery happen in the new territory because they depended on it and that could start something and make them want to secede.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American Civil War was different from many of the wars the United States had fought in at this time. Mostly this nation had only helped out in wars for other countries, or to just become one country itself. By the mid-1800s though, the separate areas of the U.S. had begun to develop diverse ideas regarding many important decisions. The separate areas of the Unites States quickly shifted into the North or the South. One of the matters in particular that the North and the South greatly disagreed on was slavery.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Democrat and Republican parties of the late 1800’s had a parallel belief that it was giving a voice to its constituents. The Republicans and Democrats fought over political corruption, civil rights, reconstruction, immigration, and States’ rights. Republicans appealed to the Union, Border States, and African Americans. The South had to be rebuilt, but giving power to the Southern whites was not an option at any time. Lincoln’s 10% Reconstruction plan would swiftly allow seceded states back into the Union, but Congress did not agree with this plan and in response they came up with the Wade-Davis Bill. The passing of this bill revealed some conflicts between Congress and…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Southern Democrats were all about agriculture, which made them prone to try and keep slavery around for the long haul in the United States. Without slavery, these states would have no economy and not be able to sustain any kind of work. These slaves were very important, even though there were many slaves, they were treated very poorly. This was unliked by the northern Whig party and many people protested these acts. In the north, manufacturing, and industry was the way of life. These people were not using slaves and shamed much of the south for using them. This created many of the disagreements that these two opposing parties faced. (synthesis: geographical &…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mrs. I Can Do It

    • 4811 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The American Civil War was a result of the northern and southern having completely different views on states being able to rule themselves. The election of Abraham Lincoln led many southern states to secede from the Union. The South was strongly opposed to Lincoln and his policies. “Lincoln won not a single electoral vote in the South, and his Republican Party had vowed to prevent the extension of slavery.” 1 South Carolina was the first states to secede from the Union and gradually more and more southern states followed. Jefferson Davis emerged as the President of the Confederacy while Lincoln was President of the Union. As war broke out between the North and South, there were some key reasons why the North was able to defeat the South.…

    • 4811 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite evident that having two completely opposite ways of life and thinking can lead to a direct influence to how each region viewed the political side of life. The Northern region had the anti-slavery expansion activists known as the Republican party. This group opposed the Southern states which had a dominant group as well known as the Democrats. Both of these parties exist today and are still very opposite in their concepts and methods.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil war was inevitable if the conflict between the south and the north, slavery and politics were resolved. After independence, the differences and complexity of America sharpened increasing slavery. The complexities in terms of the migration of the whites and black slaves and shift from small scale farming to large scale farming made civil war inevitable. There were many differences between the north and south. The north preferred city life while the south was keen to plantation life. The south was more agricultural and the north more industrial. To add to that the north’s economy was increasing as time went by. Meanwhile the south’s was dependent on one thing...cotton. Their biggest difference was slavery and until Abraham Lincoln won…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Americans sorted through what kind of country they were going to be various opposite sided viewpoints would help shape our nation in how we interpret the constitution, how we vote, and how we dealt with foreign affairs. The federalists and the democratic-republicans became the origin of a two-party political system in the United States. The two parties varied drastically not just in their policies but also in who were being represented in these groups. On the federalist end we have merchants, bankers, the mostly educated classes of people contrastingly on the republican side we have the artisans, the farmers, and mostly ill-educated folk. The two sides disagreed on most matters mainly regarding the interpretation of the constitution,…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The entire difference between economic form of both north and south is the fundamental reason that lead to the war. The north’s economy was based on commerce and capitalism.They built industrial factory and produced mechanical components.So they didn’t need much slave because local people could handle the work needed for the industrialized production.However, the south’s economy was largely based on agricultural manufacture—cotton.Being the biggest part of sectionalism, economic difference increased steadily as the north industrialized, urbanized, and built prosperous farms, while the south concentrated on plantation agriculture based on slave labor[1].But whether different economic form really negatively contributed to the break out of the…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was fought between the Northern and Southern states of of America. Was the Civil War inevitable? It was a conflict bound to happen due to the differences between the North and South’s views on slavery, society, and politics. The South wanted their independence and freedom from the North, while the North wanted unity.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What They Fought Fo

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout my years of history lessons, I was under the understanding that the civil war was simply a war over slavery. Over time I have come to realize there is much more behind the North and South’s reasons for fighting than just the concept of slavery. Everything that ties in with slavery played a massive role in the Civil was, such as; equality, individual rights and liberties, and the basic set up of American government. However, slavery was playing a portion of the role in the war. Other than the underlying hatred of the North towards the South, and the South towards the North, there were many other factors fueling that fire. The civil war was more than a series of battles between the Confederacy and the Union. While Union soldiers from the North were focused on fighting for the underlying principles that the founding fathers had established our nation upon, the Confederate soldiers from the South focused on their strong sense of nationalism and copious amounts of pride towards self-government and their personal property.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War, which split the United States, was a clash of two aspects of approaching the American Dream in a young America. Both sides felt their idea's and philosophies were far greater than those of the opposing side and therefore would benefit the nation more and make it superior. Both North and South wanted to better the country to have it achieve the American Dream. Unfortunately, each side had a different points of view as to how to achieve it. Slavery was a major issue, the North against, the South for it.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    AP US Essay

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A distinct two party system began to form in the period of 1820-1840. This change began to form because of several reasons including Major Political Personalities as well as economic issues. For example, a strong Sectionalist leader John C. Calhoun faced issues with the Tariff of Abominations and how it unfairly taxed his region. In his South Carolina exposition he denounced the tariffed and called for the secession of any state who agreed. This led a division between those who supported States rights and those who did not. Conflicts such as this arouse frequently during this time period and allowed for two distinct parties to be formed.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays