Preview

Compare And Contrast Mo Tzu And Leo Tolstoy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
237 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Mo Tzu And Leo Tolstoy
Both Leo Tolstoy and Mo Tzu were concerned about the purpose of artistic expression as well as its usefulness in society. They both opposed art that could only be appreciated by the elite class of society but could not have the same effect on those in the lower classes. However, they both take a different view on the significance of art in society and its usefulness altogether. Tolstoy states in, What Is Art?, that art that can only be admired by the social elite and not by the masses is simply bad art or not art at all, not because the lower classes are incapable of understanding it or are lesser beings than those that are wealthy, but because in order for art to be considered great it has to be appreciated by all people. In Mo Tzu’s, Against
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hitler Vs Stalin
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hitler Vs Stalin

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Lao-Tzu And Machiavelli
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Lao-Tzu And Machiavelli

    Even though Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli were both advisors there was still many differences of the two’s views on how a government should be. A leader is a person who leads or commands a group, organization, or a country. It does not matter what state, country, or city someone lives in they are guaranteed to have a leader. Leaders have been around in every era. If considered to be a leader, people wanted to be great and admired for what they had done or were going to do. Both Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli lived in different times and completely different geographical areas, but they lived as advisors. Everybody is their own person and of course they had different views on how a country should be run. Although they had different views, their ultimate goal was to be better leaders. Three main differences between the two’s government views included war, money, and government involvement in the everyday lives of citizens.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Mussolini And Stalin
    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Mussolini And Stalin

    If one was alive and young back at the time of the second great war, which country would one choose to live in? Italy or Russia? Germany or Britain? United States or Japan? It honestly depended on the leaders. During the years of World War 2, there were many leaders; such as Roosevelt, Churchill, Hitler, and the two that were alike in many ways, but were also different are Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin. These two were Dictators who ruled over two different countries Mussolini ruled Italy, and Stalin ruled Russia. What did they stand for, did they treated their citizens differently, and what goals did they have? All of these questions will be answered in the following paragraphs, where you can easily tell the differences…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Tom Robinson And Boo Radley
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Tom Robinson And Boo Radley

    Boo Radley and Tom Robinson are both a symbolized by the mockingbird. Boo Radley is a symbolized as a mockingbird. The first reason why Boo Radley is symbolized by the mockingbird is he is Misjudged by people. People thinks he's weird because he's inside his house all the time. He puts items in the tree for Scout and Jem to find.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Lao Tzu And Machiavelli
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Difference Between Lao Tzu And Machiavelli

    Lao-Tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher during the 6th century. Conversely, Machiavelli was an Italian historian, author, diplomat, philosopher, and politician that lived almost two thousand years later during the Renaissance. Although both are from completely different times and cultures; neither would disagree that leadership is essential in the success or failure of society. After all, at its simplistic core government is just a hierarchy of leadership that exist to serve its fellow citizens. When utilized correctly, government and effective leadership can be the difference between societal paradise and peril. The question then in lies what is the correct way. This is the question in which these authors diverging opinions and philosophies are strongly rooted. Additionally this is the question that is independent and based on one factor, each author’s view of human nature.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Great Gatsby And Tom Buchanan
    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Great Gatsby And Tom Buchanan

    Imagine the 1920's have been re-enacted, a time of luxurious parties and when things, didn’t seem to matter or mean as much as they do now. The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, gives you a picture of what the time period was like. It was a time known as the "Jazz Age", where the economy was at its peak, and money was easy to be held. Prohibition was in affect, and bootlegging was very gainful for those who took part in it. Jay Gatsby most likely took part in an illegal business scheme, such as bootlegging, to make his fortune. Tom Buchanan, on the other hand though, acquired his wealth through inheritance. The plot of The Great Gatsby seemingly also revolves around a girl, Daisy Buchanan, whom Tom and Gatsby both love in different ways. However, they are similar as they both want to be able to call Daisy “mine.” In The Great Gatsby, although Tom and Gatsby strive to be financially successful and maintain a high social class, and they both love Daisy in a way, they are two completely different people with different personalities and morals.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Similarities and Differences between Benito Mussolini and Josef Stalin
    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Similarities and Differences between Benito Mussolini and Josef Stalin

    Throughout history dictators have arisen from all over. Josef Stalin and Benito Mussolini are two of the most significant dictators in history. Both of them tried to establish a totalitarian government but had many similarities and differences in obtaining that goal. Totalitarianism is when the government holds complete control of the citizens and industries.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare And Contrast Mussolini And Stalin
    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Mussolini And Stalin

    Hitler. Stalin. Mussolini. These three names define World War II. World policy revolved around them for at least a decade or in Stalin 's case for almost fifty years. Much is generally known about each man 's role in the war, but only as it pertains to the outcome. Not many people possess extensive knowledge of these dictators as individuals or as leaders of a particular party. This paper will attempt to shed light on the differences as well as the similarities of they style of totalitarianism that the three men who shaped the middle of the twentieth century implemented in their respective countries.…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Donald Kuspit Activist Art Analysis
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Donald Kuspit Activist Art Analysis

    In Leo Tolstoy’s definition, the highest form of art is that which brings people together for a greater cause and for the bettering of humanity. Activist art attempting to bring attention to social and worldly issues certainly brings people together, and when these people are brought together, they are typically all in agreeance that a change is needed for the betterment of humanity. Activist art holds a special quality in that it is able to call out to masses and heavily influence others to become aware of current issues within the world and truly inspire people to make changes within their lives to help whatever…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Compare And Contrast Lao Tzu And Machiavelli
    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Lao Tzu And Machiavelli

    These two men have a general idea of what a leader should be like. Machiavelli has a more ideal approach to leadership in today 's world. You have to take action in order to be taken serious by your people and the enemies around you. A ruler must have the respect of the people around him/her in order to be successful. That statement goes back to the idea of it being better to be hated than to be loved, most people take advantage of or don 't respect the idea of love, so it doesn 't do any justice to be loved by everyone as a…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy - Consider the View That Only Form Matters When Properly Appreciating Art
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Philosophy - Consider the View That Only Form Matters When Properly Appreciating Art

    Many people value art becuase it can inform us, we value it if it is true to nature or to life. Platos imitation theory applies here, that all artists are merely copying the form so it can not be good art, but all perceptual experience involves interpretation, so there is nothing to copy. Great historical paintings can give us visual knowledge of certain points in time, but limitations with this is that anything can inform us without being art, a book can inform us but isn't art. This ability to inform us is not what make sus appreciate it but the artistic qualities it…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber
    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Machiavelli and Max Weber

    Philosophy is referred to as a set of beliefs, concepts and attitudes held by an individual or a group of people. It is the study of problems in general and the prescription of solutions to problems based on critical and systemic analyses and the employment of rational argument. Philosophy through the lens of Political Science does so as mentioned above in terms of the state, the governance of the state the ethics of an individual in possession of political power. Political philosophers focus on the issues relating to the state, such as political action that need or need not be taken and the general behavior of a given individual involved in politics. With the focus set on just the state, political action and violence, two philosophers have critically analyzed politics through the three concepts listed above: Niccolo Machiavelli and Max Weber. They each have their own views, opinions and suggestions that both have similarities and differences considering the cultural and temporal inconsistency between the both of them. The fact that some of their ideas intersect is fascinating.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Moral moral never land
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Moral moral never land

    In his article Harold gives a considerable space to explain the point of view of Plato and Tolstoy in this case. For Plato and Tolstoy art is morally corrupting. They both defend the idea that art corrupts its audience by playing on emotion. As Harold mentions deeply that for them emotional effect of art is undeniable and it’s enough to influence how people act and what kind of people they become. For example for him if someone watches something violent it automatically affects him. Harold respond their argument with saying that this kind of a thought is more valid for their time and nowadays people have the enough knowledge to make the difference between the good and bad. That’s why for my opinion art is the best path that goes from self- development. Overall I totally disagree with the perspective of this two and think these shows are just portrays that is served for audience to interpret.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare Contrast: Hitler and Roosevelt
    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare Contrast: Hitler and Roosevelt

    The World War II era brought out many leaders, but two that were commonly acknowledged were Franklin D. Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler. Both men were very popular and were known throughout the world for their choices. The men had differed personalities but some traits were the same in both of them. The similarities and differences when comparing the two men are extremely noticeable.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Art for Me?
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is Art for Me?

    Art has been created by all people at all times; it lives because it is liked and enjoyed. Art involves personal experiences of an individual accompanied by some intensity of emotion. Art is made of man, no matter how close it is to nature. Although each work of art is evidently the expression of an artists’ personal thoughts and feelings it may be inferred that, like any other individual, he belongs to a million, and he cannot free himself from the influence of his social, economic, political, cultural, geographic, scientific, and technological environment.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics