Preview

Compare And Contrast Hunter And Gatherers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Hunter And Gatherers
Agriculturalists and hunter and gatherers are two different groups. Both of them have their own way of living and staying alive. There’s probably five to twenty similarities for both. They probably don't have much in common. Then the rest could be differences. Those two groups have probably have a different way of hunting and caring for each other, but I really don't know so keep reading and see what are their differences and similarities are. Population is something very important because they need people to help them work on fields, at home, children, and even the sick ones. For agriculturalist population begins to soar, exponential increase (becomes more and more rapid). A new role for women was to have a large families with many children. Hunter and gatherers are way different from agriculturalist, they have a small, stable population even a low child to adult ratio. Another thing was that hunter and gatherers are cautiously friendly to outsiders, so they married outside the group. For both groups I bet technology was for them to find, they probably didn’t even know what was technology. Knowledge of …show more content…
Hunter and gatherers had a diverse diet and health benefits. Also they moved seasonally so it was kinda hard for them to get food, but they would often share their food and other thing too. For agriculturalist it’s different, they didn’t move seasonally. Agriculturalist developed stores of food surpluses and other capital (wealth) meant large investments in building walls or other measures to protect it. Difficulties of disposing of the dead, food and other wastes and their own and their livestock excrement led to pollution of the living spaces. So it was harder for them to get food and it said that they also developed immunity to many diseases, but i don't know if it was because of food or something
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homo Sapiens: A Comparative Analysis
    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page

    Homo Sapiens: A Comparative Analysis

    Families were smaller, due to the fact that the population must stay small. Women and children gathered berries and nuts, while men hunted animals. When agriculture was created there was less hunting so men started to do the women’s jobs.This threw off the balance of equality. More children were forced to do laborious work, and families began to grow. Social classes began to form after agriculture. At this point only two variations of humans existed: Homo erectus and Homo sapiens. These early humans spent most of their days advancing with toolmaking and setting up civilizations around their agriculture.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Hunter Changed Societies
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Hunter Changed Societies

    The reason why hunter changed societies to sedentary agriculture is because this was a way for him to apply food much easier. When people began to figure out how to plant and harvest crops. Life became much easier. Much rather than searching for food every night. James Woodburn helped hunter when he found a rich enlightened area of Hadza. Full of life and places to harvest their food. The transition of agriculture also played a huge part in why hunter switched. The number of people living in each area implied that if there was a lot of people in a certain area, then there will be less crop being planted due to population density. They needed more food so feed the growing population.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide Exam 1-Western Civ
    • 4428 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Study Guide Exam 1-Western Civ

    Hunter-gatherers- people roamed the lands, hunted wild animals and ate edible plants. The men usually hunted bigger animals and used spears, rocks and strategy. They slept in caves or dwellings made from branches and animal skin. Their clothing was from animal skin.…

    • 4428 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Christian This Fleeting World Analysis
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    David Christian This Fleeting World Analysis

    The era of foragers, also known as the “Paleolithic era” deals with the lives of hunter-gatherers, who had survived for over 240,000 years. Their nomadic lifestyles of traveling and hunting has created a huge impact to the environment and their sophisticated technology, such as sticks and stones allowed them to settle adaptively across the globe with different climates. Succeeding foraging is the agrarian era, that lasted for almost ten thousand years. In this era, advancement with agriculture and pastoralism were a necessity as it allowed cities, states, and empires to form. Complex societies, especially hierarchy, followed along. The modern era is described to be the fastest out of the three eras proved that tremendous in population, innovation, and productivity in less than a millennium was possible. The industrial revolution was the next level of domination after agriculture and since has shaped the world through today where better sophisticated technology (such as the steam engine that allowed quick supply of cheap energy) was able to expand to all regions. After the main text, this book ends with the resource pages, periodization chapter, and the index. (need…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hunter Gatherer Research Paper
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hunter Gatherer Research Paper

    What are some common social characteristics of a hunter-gatherer society? Was there a consistent division of labor among members of specific tribes?…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Patholithic And Neolithic Societies
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Patholithic And Neolithic Societies

    Another connection between the Patheolithic and the Neolithic was meat. Although, the Patheolithic hunted the animals, and the Neolithic had domesticated the animals, it is still a likeness the two societies share. Examples of the animals hunted and the animals domesticated are sheep and goats, and eventually cattle and pigs. The Neolithic society was more likely to eat at feasts.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Homo Sapiens Manipulate Their Living Environment
    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Homo Sapiens Manipulate Their Living Environment

    The homo sapiens were able settle in one area until the soil could no longer sustain the plants and animal this made the domestication of plants and animals possible; the agriculture era was underway. The homo sapiens became Nomadic pastoralist moving their animals and plants and settlements to different areas with horses as resources would exhaust: transhumant herders kept their settlement in one area while moving their animals around. The earth drying made irrigation necessary to water plants and animals in some highland areas, others that lived close to water learned to fish and hand water their plants using pottery they made. All this agricultural growth led to trading and wealth status. Organized villages began to develop people started to perfect crafts such as farming, basket weaving and fishing; this led to changes in roles of men and woman with males being more dominate. Men would tend to the animals and plow fields while woman would harvest crops and prepare food. The changing of the climate had a huge impact on evolution and agriculture then and still has an impact…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Outline and Evaluate the Evolutionary Explanation for Gender Roles
    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Outline and Evaluate the Evolutionary Explanation for Gender Roles

    To support the evolutionary perspective, the division of labour was shown to be an advantage. Men were the hunter gathers, breadwinners, while the mother was at home acting as the ‘angel of the house’ and looking after the children. If a women was to hunt, this would reduce the group’s reproductive success, as the woman was the one who was pregnant or producing milk. Although, the women could contribute to the important business of growing food, making clothing and shelter and so on. This enhances reproductive success but it also important in avoiding starvation – an…

    • 973 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Iroquois Compare And Contrast
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    Iroquois Compare And Contrast

    Third, somthing different between one on two is the Inuit only hunted, but the haida gathered plants and hunted, and so did the Iroquois, but the Iroquois farmed not so much…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP World History comparetive essay
    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages

    AP World History comparetive essay

    What are the differences, similarities between the Paleolithic and Neolithic human eras? In this essay we will unfold how each group survived, lived, created, traveled and died. The Paleolithic Era or Old Stone Age, is a period of prehistory from about 2.6 million years ago to around 10,000 years ago. The Neolithic Era or New Stone Age began around 10,000 BC and ended between 4500 and 2000 BC in numerous parts of the world. In the Paleolithic era, there were more than one human species but only one survived until the Neolithic era. Paleolithic humans lived in small groups. They used primitive stone tools and their survival depended on their environment and climate. Neolithic humans discovered agriculture and animal care, which allowed them to settle down in one area.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paleolithic And Neolithic Similarities
    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page

    Paleolithic And Neolithic Similarities

    As hominids were transitioning from the Paleolithic era to the Neolithic era their culture, social classes, and gender roles had various differences and similarities. The culture in the Paleolithic era and the Neolithic era similarities was the shared beliefs in the afterlife, however the Paleolithic hominids practiced polydaemonism and in Neolithic era there was the beginnings of an organized religion, and the creation of gods. In the Paleolithic era it was an egalitarian society due to both of the men and women contributing to the production of food, and Neolithic hominids place in society was predetermined. Furthermore, there was a gender distinction in the Paleolithic and Neolithic era due to the rise of the Agricultural Revolution…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paleolithic Vs Neolithic Dbq
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paleolithic Vs Neolithic Dbq

    One social difference is what they believe in. The People of the Paleolithic ages people believed that nature controlled everything. While in the Neolithic age people believed that god created and controlled everything. A political difference was the way they communicated was also different. In the Paleolithic age people communicated using gestures and objects. In the Neolithic age people became more advanced and developed a writing system and…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Neolithic Revolution Research Paper
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Neolithic Revolution Research Paper

    The Neolithic Revolution drastically altered the way people lived. During the Neolithic Revolution, people began to gain knowledge about animal husbandry and how to cultivate various crops. Animal domestication was important because animals provided food, assisted in farming, and aided in travel. Animals such as cows provided meat and milk, oxen were used for transportation and to plow fields, and dogs aided in hunting. The ability to grow various crops allowed for fewer people to provide more food. This gave societies a substantial food source. Consequently, there was no longer a need to move in search of food, which exposed them to a greater risk of harm and death. The nomadic lifestyle hunter-gatherer societies lived were left behind in favor of a safer,…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare And Contrast Europeans And Native Americans
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Europeans And Native Americans

    The European nations all had at least one thing in common when they came to the Americas and that was to increase their wealth. The Europeans thought of themselves as bold, fearless, and heroic explorers that sailed across the Atlantic Ocean to discover a new kind of world. The Native Americans believed the Europeans were ruthless marauders. The truth is that both the Europeans and Native Americans’ viewpoints were right. The Americas were unknown and nonexistent to Europeans until their courageous explorers braved the crossing of the Atlantic to find it.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paleolithic Vs Neolithic Research Paper
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paleolithic Vs Neolithic Research Paper

    In the Paleolithic Period, there was no no agriculture, no surplus food and no civilization. For tens of thousands of years, humans for nomads which meant that they would only stay in one place for a couple weeks or months. They moved constantly in search of a new source of animals to kill and plants to gather. This is why they were called hunter and gathers.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics