Preview

Compare and Contrast Hitler and Mussolini

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Hitler and Mussolini
League of Nations

The League of Nations (LON) was an inter-governmental organization founded as a result of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919–1920, and the precursor to the United Nations. At its greatest extent from 28 September 1934 to 23 February 1935, it had 58 members. The League's primary goals, as stated in its Covenant, included preventing war through collective security, disarmament, and settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration.[1] Other goals in this and related treaties included labor conditions, just treatment of native inhabitants, trafficking in persons and drugs, arms trade, global health, prisoners of war, and protection of minorities in Europe.[2]

The diplomatic philosophy behind the League represented a fundamental shift in thought from the preceding hundred years. The League lacked its own armed force and so depended on the Great Powers to enforce its resolutions, keep to economic sanctions which the League ordered, or provide an army, when needed, for the League to use. However, they were often reluctant to do so.

Sanctions could also hurt the League members, so they were reluctant to comply with them. When, during the Second Italo-Abyssinian War, the League accused Benito Mussolini's soldiers of targeting Red Cross medical tents, Mussolini responded that Ethiopians were not fully human, therefore the human rights laws did not apply. Benito Mussolini stated that "The League is very well when sparrows shout, but no good at all when eagles fall out."[3]

After a number of notable successes and some early failures in the 1920s, the League ultimately proved incapable of preventing aggression by the Axis powers in the 1930s. In May 1933, Franz Bernheim, a Jew, complained that his rights as a minority were being violated by the German administration of Upper Silesia, which induced the Germans to defer enforcement of the anti-Jewish laws in the region for several years until the relevant treaty expired in 1937,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So Mussolini was not only a bad man but also as a kid. He is Italian he was prime minister before he became a dictator. His people looked up to him because of how he was nice to them. But then they no longer liked him when he was in world war 11. He was a Nazi he killed Jews and his own people. He died by people killing him and hanging him upside…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If one was alive and young back at the time of the second great war, which country would one choose to live in? Italy or Russia? Germany or Britain? United States or Japan? It honestly depended on the leaders. During the years of World War 2, there were many leaders; such as Roosevelt, Churchill, Hitler, and the two that were alike in many ways, but were also different are Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin. These two were Dictators who ruled over two different countries Mussolini ruled Italy, and Stalin ruled Russia. What did they stand for, did they treated their citizens differently, and what goals did they have? All of these questions will be answered in the following paragraphs, where you can easily tell the differences…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was at this time when small, pro nationalist groups began to spread all over Italy under the new name of the fascist party which was under the control of one Benito Mussolini. He swiftly began to increase in popularity and he would stop at nothing to get to the top of the political ladder. This-in conjunction to the rest of his life-can be used to make a judgement on whether Benito Mussolini was a man who cared for the renewal of his country and or if he believed that all men were expendable for his well-being. Many historians have come to the conclusion that he was a vein man of evil as he invaded defenceless nations such as Ethiopia in the name of establishing fascism within East Africa. He became the accomplice of Adolf Hitler thereby disregarding the Jewish people. And finally his lust for power and greed brought about the timely fall of his fascist empire. Therefore, it can be said that Benito Mussolini was a vile and self-righteous…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1996 Apush Exam

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The unconditional adherence of the United Stated to the charter of the League of Nations…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both of these dictators were similar and different in many ways, Mussolini was the leader of Italy while Hitler was the leader of the Nazi Party. Mussolini also had the government act as a mediator between employers and workers to settle disputes. His goal was to create a new Roman Empire while Hitler’s goal was to acquire a living space which he accomplished by taking control of areas in Poland, the Soviet Union, and other nations to the east. Mussolini was a political journalist and socialist activist prior to the war as for Hitler, he volunteered for the Bavarian army as an Austrian national.…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the end of the Great War (WW1) the League of Nations was established with the aim to end warfare throughout the world. The idea was suggested by the American President Woodrow Wilson, in his 14 point plan. The premise of the League was, to improve international cooperation, peace and security through the world. Other things mentioned in its covenant were:…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revered by few, despised by many, and known by all, two of the most arguably world-renowned authoritarians consisted of a paranoid Russian tyrant and a ruthless German dictator who both led their countries with iron fists. Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler have written themselves into the world's history through their actions in the gruesome, looming beast that was World War II, of the treatment of their nations, and of the governments they represented. In theory, these two leaders piloted their nations quite similarly, but although both Stalin and Hitler have become known as famous and powerful dictators with analogous aspirations, their individual policies of ruling were actually strikingly different.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Understand The Future

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    points to preserve peace. More than 40 nations joined the League of Nations and they agreed to talk…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The World War II era brought out many leaders, but two that were commonly acknowledged were Franklin D. Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler. Both men were very popular and were known throughout the world for their choices. The men had differed personalities but some traits were the same in both of them. The similarities and differences when comparing the two men are extremely noticeable.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    aims was to prevent to outbreak of wars, improve people's lives and jobs, agree to disarmament, and enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The League hoped it could influence countries to ensure peace by international diplomacy and mediation, economic sanction, force, and moral condemnation. This seemed to work well at first; however, later, there proved to be many weaknesses contained in the Treaty. For example, the League did not have an army of its own, which means that if any of the countries ignored the Leagues decision, then the League would have no power to do anything. The main strength of the League was that it was set up by the Treaty of Versailles. Later, people started to attack the treaty; this was also a major weakness of the League. In fact, one of the most serious weaknesses was that the League had limited membership. Most of the powerful countries were not members. For instance, the US refused to join although Woodrow Wilson was the one who proposed the idea of a League. Germany was not allowed to be a member, and communist Russia resented Britain and France's membership. Another critical weakness was the decision-making process established by the League. This process involves all the members acting together in order for the League to take action. Therefore, if one member disagrees or does…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were specific laws put into place to restrict the rights of the black members of society in America as well as the Jewish members of the German society. Examining the harsh economic and political atmosphere during the Great Depression reveals striking similarities on Hitler’s treatment of the Jews and the laws and regulations enacted in the United States to restrict and control black Americans.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manchuria and Abyssinia

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Manchuria and Abyssinia were two nations conquered in the early 1930s. The invasions of these two nations destroyed the world’s belief in the ability and strength of the League of Nations. The authority of the League of Nations was lost during these two major events. This was due to the slow and poor reactions of the league in both situations. The League made inadequate decisions to suppress the attacking nations and this showed the world that the small and less powerful nations could not expect protection by the League and it also gave the aggressors and leaders the proof they needed to know there wasn’t anything standing in their way. These two major triumphs of invasion, made obvious to the world that the League was not competent in fulfilling its’ main objectives, which were to keep peace in the world by solving conflicts between nations in peaceful ways, and to prevent such invasions.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is where the Treaty of Versailles was drafted and signed by multiple countries, except the United States. As stated in Document A, “The first proposition...with the proposed League of Nations in that of a tribunal to settle the matters of controversy which may arise between different nations.” The League of Nations was an organization created during the conference to join the allied powers that would collectivise decisions in world affairs. Although Woodrow Wilson thought highly of this idea many conservatives and liberals saw this as a way to strip Americans ability to make decisions on its own. They feared that the nation would revert back to being controlled as England once had colonial rule over it. Another issue was that the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles had no way of enforcing peace without disrupting it. As also demonstrated in Document A, the Treaty tried keep peace but couldn’t because it would use violence to stop violence. In other words it would use larger unified forces to stop smaller disputes that threatened world peace.To further support conservative views, the popular vote would decide whether or not the nations in the League would involve themselves in world disputes. With this system, it was impossible to have a decision fair to all nations because if it wasn’t unanimous, at least one nation would go unrepresented and be involved or uninvolved in something they disagreed…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did disarmament fail?

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In February 1932 the long-promised Disarmament Conference finally got under way. By July 1932 it had produced resolutions to prohibit bombing of civilian populations, limit the size of artillery, limit the tonnage of tanks, and prohibit chemical warfare. But there was very little in the resolutions to show how these limits would be achieved. It was not a promising start. However, there was a bigger problem facing the Conference – what to do about Germany. The Germans had been in the League for six years. Most people now accepted that they should be treated more equally than under the Treaty of Versailles. The big question was whether everyone else should disarm to the level that Germany had been forced to, or whether the Germans should be allowed to rearm to a level closer to that of other powers.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays