Preview

Compare and contrast the constitutions of France and Germany

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1916 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and contrast the constitutions of France and Germany
Constitutions are codes of rules which aspire to regulate the allocation of functions, powers and duties among the carious agencies and officers of government, and define the relationships between these and the public (Finer 1979: 15). The German Constitution known as the Basic Law was adopted on 23 May, 1949 by the West German State and became the constitution of the entire Federal Republic of Germany with the 1990 reunification. Its French counterpart came into effect on October 4, 1958 leading to the proclamation of the Fifth Republic with Charles de Gaulle as first President. Both the French and German constitutions are formally codified and possess respectively 89 and 146 articles in their current form. In comparing and contrasting them, I will first focus on the impact of the historical context, on the importance given to rights, on the duties, powers and functions of the political executive and of the legislature, and finally on the amendment and judicial review procedures.

In order to understand the drafting of the two constitutions, it is essential to take their historical context into account. The two texts were adopted as part of a political fresh start with a clear will to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. The previous French Republic, as well as the Weimar Republic (1918-33), had notably been paralysed by unstable governments, for the use of proportional representation in the lower house elections had led to an overly fragmented system. A series of safeguards were therefore created in the two new texts so as to ensure durable and effective governments.

Many differences have also stemmed from their respective historical backgrounds however. Contrary to the 1958 French Constitution, the Basic Law involved a radical change of regime from the Third Reich dictatorship (1933-1945) to the Federal Republic of Germany. By naming it Basic Law-Grundgesetz- and not Constitution -Verfassung-, the Länder also stressed the provisional character of a paper



Bibliography: Ardant, P. (2003). Institutions Politiques et Droit Constitutionnel, 15th edition. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence Carcassonne, G. (2002). The Principles of the French Constitution. http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/francophone/principles_en.pdf [16 March 2006] Camy, O. (2005). Modifier la Constitution: L 'intervention directe du peuple par la voie du référendum, http://www.droitconstitutionnel.net [21 March 2006] Grewe, C. and Ruiz Fabri, H. (1995). Droits constitutionnels européens. Paris : PUF coll. Droit fondamental Duverger, M. (1980). 'A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government '. European Journal of European Research, vol. 8, pp 165-187 Finer, S.E. (1979). Five Constitutions. Harmondsworth: Penguin Gordeeva, T.(2006). The [German] Constitution. http://www.germanculture.com.ua/library/facts/bl_constitution.htm [15 March 2006] Gallagher, Laver and Mair Representative Government in Modern Europe Lambin, J.M. (1998). Histoire Terminales. Paris: Hachette Education Touret, D. (2006). Le système constitutionnel de la République fédérale d 'Allemagne and Elaboration et Principes Fondamentaux de la Constitution de la Vème République, http://www.chez.com/constit/ [17 March 2006]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Tijerina, Andres and Montgomery, William E. Vol. 2 of Building A Democratic Nation: A…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When one thinks of presidents residing over a country, the most coveted powers come to mind, especially for United States citizens, where its chief has centralized command over important facets of the government. However, not all presidential systems are the same. For some, the title only bears a symbolic representation for head of state and nothing more. Other presidents find themselves sharing powers with additional officials. The most interesting comparison between presidential systems that have different processes of election and distributions of authority is the United States and France. The examination of the nomination process, voting measures, campaign spending, the media and debates will distinguish the election process. Only then is it fitting to compare and contrasts constitutional powers that each president holds and the shaping of these powers by the governmental system.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Structure

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 1 of the constitution covers the purpose and the organization of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Though there are ten sections in the Article and numerous subparagraphs, this paper will focus on the structure, and a few of the subparagraphs concerning its function. We will begin with the organization since this should be covered before the responsibilities are addressed; this starts in the second section, with how the house will be selected, the requirements to be selected, and how the proportions should be arranged. This was an extremely sensitive subject for many of the delegates at the time of the framing of the constitution due to representation.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Besselink, Leonard F.M. Constitutional Law of the Netherlands. (2004). (Ars Aequi Libri: Nijmegen). [24 April 2007].…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imperial Germany was replaced by the Weimar Republic on the 9th of November 1918 opening the door for the democracy which subsequently lead to political instability and a contrastingly new liberal society. This new republic adopted the Weimar constitution which created the first parliamentary democracy in Germany. The change in society from a previously autocratic society is highlighted by a passage in the Constitution saying “The German Commonwealth is a Republic. Political authority is derived from the People”. Electors were now all men and women above the age of 20 compared to before where it was men only above the age of 25. It also guaranteed personal freedoms such as religious freedom and freedom of speech. This new highly liberal and democratic society highlighted a change in society from the previous autocratic one controlled by the Kaiser. However the Weimar constitution had flaws in it which were used ultimately in its fall such as Article 48 and proportional representation in the Reichstag. Historian Eric Weitz said “The flaws…were to do [more] with…the fact that German society was so fragmented” highlighting that although there were flaws, they could have worked under a society more committed to democratic…

    • 1649 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    • By the LAW OF BRUMAIRE a new government was established under the direction of three consuls : Suyes, Ducos, Napoleon. The “First council” was necessary for stability and two others had advisory role. Council of State and a senate to advise the councils-packed with Napoleon`s. The Tribune and Legislative to help with law making indirectly elected by universal suffrage. Only 3 million of people were for new constitution and 1500 were against.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    France’s approach to political power changed many times throughout history. In the beginning of the 18th century, France’s government was a hereditary monarchy: a form of rule prevalent throughout Europe at that time. Ruling France’s hereditary monarchy were the Bourbons. Prior to 1789, there were clear indications that “the government was economically, politically, and militarily bankrupt.” These were some of the events that foreshadowed the imminent collapse of the Bourbons. Whether Bourbon or Constitutional, monarchies were ultimately not an effective form of government in France. Because of this, France strayed from a new form of monarchy and became a democracy. Additionally, through the abandonment of monarchies came the creation of the…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to Rousseau’s belief that the monarch should not have the power to veto, this provision of the current constitution (the Constitution of 1791) would empower the monarch to veto legislation for up to five years. This provides one essential check on the immense and wrong power of the National Assembly because it has too much power, with no other institutions to check that power. The National Assembly’s conception of power will ultimately lead to the ruin and devastation of France, largely through the lack of leadership, skill, direction, and foresight of the members of the National Assembly. The king needs to maintain his monarchical powers and rights, while the National Assembly needs to have serious checks on their powers before the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far did the new German constitution of 1871 establish a democratic form of government in Germany?…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texas Political Culture

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Each one exhibits both continuity with and departures from its predecessors. Each constitution in specific ways attempted to correct the perceived deficiencies of the previous political order and address the challenges of its times.…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The different forms of democratic systems are formed upon different histories. “Great Britain with an early industrial revolution and stable government developed a strong parliament that gradually became more democratic; on the other hand, France had a late industrial…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    It is known to most that western countries are on the rule of parliamentary democracy. We also know that Western countries inherited their political system from the ancient Greeks and Romans, especially the Roman political system. It has shaped the western parliamentary system more than any others. However, different parliamentary systems and their specific characteristics have shaped Ancient Rome from what it was to…

    • 4122 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hague and Harrop define a codified constitution, such as the American Constitution, as a single document that ‘sets out the formal structure of the state, specifying the powers and institutions of central government, and its relationship with other levels. The Constitution established itself as ‘the supreme law of the land.’ In addition, constitutions express the rights of citizens and in so doing create limits on government.’ Ratified in 1789, the American Constitution still provides the basic rules and establishes the basic institutional framework for the American political system. In addition, the Constitution protects the civil rights of citizens. David Barrows regards the ability of the Constitution to survive time as ‘extraordinary’, especially considering the ‘immigration from European countries of extraordinary proportions ... from countries of entirely different social and political order’. In addition, the Constitution has endured the most testing of times; the near quadrupling of the original number of states in the union; the issue of slavery; the Civil War and, the Great Depression. The Constitution’s strength is further emphasised by comparison to the French constitution, which has been replaced twelve times in the same time period. The Constitution is the oldest living written constitution in the world and has only been formally amended 17 times in last 218 years. This essay will argue that the ‘extraordinary’ achievement of the Constitution to have lasted so long and the words to have changed so little is a result of several interrelated factors. The cumbersome amendment procedure and separation of powers has protected it from political movements. Its lack of length, breadth and depth has limited the scope of alteration. Furthermore, the Constitution is protected by its highly symbolic nature. Moreover, the Constitution is widely regarded as ‘perfect’ by Americans and as a result, it is unpopular…

    • 3552 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays