Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Comparative Essay Imperial Rome Han

Good Essays
835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparative Essay Imperial Rome Han
Throughout the classical period, many civilizations, and empires have grown, like Greece, the Mayan empire, and the Gupta Empire. Although many have rose, and became greater, a few empires also got destroyed, including some of the same that grew. Near the end of the classical period, two of the largest empires of Ancient Europe and Asia, Rome and Han China collapsed. Even though the Han China Empire only lasted 200 years, and Rome around 900, they were the largest empires in the classical period. Each empire had many different emperors, and rulers, yet they continued to fail in restoring the empires. During the Classical era, the Roman Empire and Han China both had problems with epidemics, and corrupt leaders; However, they also divided they're kingdoms differently, and fell from different conflicts.

Both Han China, and the Roman Empire had problems with epidemics, and corrupt leaders. In the beginning, when the Silk Roads were first developed, all the civilizations saw it as a great way to trade, which it was. It was also great for the spread of culture, technology, and mixing many religions to create new beliefs. It was going great, until diseases broke out, and started to spread quickly all over the silk roads and back inside the cities. Because of the epidemics, cities tried to refrain from sending merchants, and traders out because they could get so easily infected. This caused all of the civilizations to become more independent, so they wouldn’t need to go outside of their own walls to get what they needed as much as they did originally; which now stopped all the spreading of culture, and made some of the civilizations weak. The emperors started to become very brutal, and crazy. A lot of them were killed, and plotted against by angry citizens who couldn’t put up with them, or by leaders who were corrupt, and wanted to be emperor. Mainly consisted of generals, sons of emperors, and other rich romans that were all trying to outsmart the other, while trying to survive in the current corruption of the Roman government. These corrupt leaders were a result of 25 out of 26 dead roman emperors in a span of 50 years. In Han China it wasn’t as obvious, but there were many cases of backstabbing, and infighting between officials, and others. This mainly consisted of peasant rebellions, and outbreaks within the cities for many reasons.

Although Imperial Rome and Han China had some similar problems they also divided they're kingdoms differently, and had different conflicts. Both empires were huge, with very large populations and social classes. With many invasions by outside tribes and some outbreaks from the inside of Rome, they decided it would be best to divide they're empire into two parts, but remained one central ruler. They then divided each half into two subgroups. This would help the empire control more easily, and efficiently. It took away from the central power, but also spread the army throughout the whole empire, instead of having one central army, which would put a big delay on defending they're cities. Han china, having not as big of a population, or empire, decides to also divide they're empire for easier control. They divide it into three separate kingdoms, instead of two or four like Rome. Unfortunately, these kingdoms only lasted a few years before it finally collapsed, and were over taken by landowners. Both empires also faced many conflicts, internal and external. Nomads entered, and effected both empires; however, in Rome they invaded, and tried to overpower them, while in Han China they came in peacefully. Partially due by the corrupt leadership, Han China had a lot of peasant rebellions against the government, due to land distribution, and various other reasons. Also with the Germanic tribes pushing on both empires, it was hard to prosper. Rome had invasions from the Germanic tribes, because of the pressure of Attila, and the Huns, on the tribes to retreat. If Attila would of went straight for Rome, Rome would of defended they're empire easily, but because of Attila’s idea to push the Germanic tribes in before them, Rome eventually collapsed. Han China didn't fall from attacks, or invasions, but because of its own internal problems to keep a stable government that everyone would cooperate with, and that they could easily control.

Summarily, Han china and the Roman Empire collapsed, not from a greater army, or greater power than themselves, but from their own failure to contain and protect such a large civilization. Once they divided they're empire, each part slowly fell. In Han China, each part was taken over but, in Rome, one half fell, while the other stayed strong for a little longer, until they both fell. Now we will let these lessons remind us how important it is to maintain control of the little things, like defense, land distribution, corrupted leadership, and many other things these civilizations failed to do, which caused the downfall of the Imperial Roman Empire, and the large Han Dynasty.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China And Rome Dbq Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though both the Chinese and Roman Empires were huge, wealthy, and powerful, they both had tragic falls. China was destroyed by nomadic invaders, a lack of army, and the influence of Buddhism. Rome, on the other hand was ruined by attacks by other civilizations, the loss of productive members of society, and the influence of Christianity. Both empires suffered from similar ideas, such as religion, or a lack of military, but each idea impacted them in different ways. Though the Chinese and Roman Empire were truly remarkable, like many other ancient empires, they had a devastating…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China during the time 200 bce. through 200 ce. and Imperial Rome during the time of 31 bce. though 476 ce. had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities between the two are their religious policies, the significance of their armies, rebelliations from the people, and the role of the emperor. These empires had many differences as well such as the acceptance of outsiders, their influences on other regions, and their philosophies.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Roman Empire

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both civilizations had very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. Both empires had to develop road systems for their expanding military. The Roman army men were experienced and privileged and held high ranks in their class system and played an important role, along with the senate, in choosing an emperor. The center power for the Roman empire was generally the senate. The ruler for the Han dynasty was hereditary. The Han dynasty's military wasn't as loyal. Most of the soldiers were newly drafted and didn't have much experience. China had two capital cities which served as seats of power for emperors and they were Louyang (located in the east) and Chang'an (located in the West). The merchant class in Han was restricted by the government unlike the middle class in Rome whom were free from government constraints which allowed economic mobility. The imperial model was only revived in China later but it never revived in Rome.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and China were somewhat different in religion, but were very different in technology. China was based on production and Rome was based on architecture and building. While Rome was creating arches and inventing concrete, China was creating a watermill and inventing paper and the seismometer. Both were unique in these ways but agreed that roads were very important. Roads connected empires across the hemisphere and allowed quick transportation for armies. Neither Rome nor China could ignore building roads because they are the key to expanding an empire.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late Classical Period (200-600 C.E.), all the great empires collapsed. The collapse of the empires did not happen abruptly but was a process. The fall of the Han dynasty and the Roman Empire showed similar characteristics. Both empires simply got too big, too overextended, and when weakened were overrun by barbarian tribes. However, there are profound differences as well. The Roman Empire proofed too expansive to be sustained by the available resources with no new technological innovations especially when the revenue decreased due to no new countries being conquered. China during the Han dynasty produced several new inventions like the ox drawn plow. China’s increase in population contributed to the collapse of the empire as did the decrease of the Roman population.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control vary religiously through the influences of their religions on the people and government, as well as through leadership styles; however, they are analogous regarding territorial expansion through reliance on the military.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and The Roman Empire both were able to expand and develop their empires with their distinctive governing methods and control. To China, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who greatly observed the Mandate of Heaven. The Han developed a supply of soldiers, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, blended structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Republic, which was more like a monarchy, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The governors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could have leaded to outbreaks in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was entirely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social interaction.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First, ancient Rome and Han China both shared social views. Male dominance was a big thing for both, as they only cared to produce male offspring and didn't really care much about the women. In Han China it was a bit of a disgrace to produce women offspring; in Rome women were in the same social level as all of the children, everybody under seven-teen years of age. Even-though they both had sort of a sexism society, their paterfamilias were very loyal and respectful. Rome had a lot more slaves then Han China, however they led to an economical downfall in both ancient Rome and Han China.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hierarchy. But in contrast, the Romans were more benign on the one affecting the family’s hierarchy,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a myriad of factors that led to the collapse of classical China and Rome including: different types of political decay, large impersonal forces, and cultural factors.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome were controlled under one central leader. The leader of the Han Dynasty had the overall power, but set up administrative districts governed by officials. The emperor also used Confucianism as a means to train people to become educated bureaucrats, who would then enforce his policies. However, the ruler of Imperial Rome set up a monarchy, disguised as a Republic, so that he could maintain complete control over his citizens. This allowed the citizens to feel as if they were contributing to government, and also allow the emperor to maintain control over his empire. Both societies also created more centralized governments by developing vast expanses of roads to promote trade, as well as levying taxes to stimulate economic prosperity.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Han and Imperial Rome were two very important empires in Europe and Asia. Even though their time in ruling was different they both were very powerful in their time. The Imperial Rules of Rome and Han China had differences and similarities in the techniques of imperial administration such as different ways of religion, Confucianism and Christianity, similar social aspects because of patriarchy as well as economic similarities such as trade in the Silk Road.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays