Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Comparative Critique: Milgram vs. Asch

Good Essays
970 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparative Critique: Milgram vs. Asch
Comparative Critique In a comparative critique similarities and differences are given between two articles as well as the readers own opinion of the authors’ work. In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience”, certain experiments were conducted on separate types of individuals. Milgram forces his subjects to administer shocks to a non-existent person on the other side of a wall. This experiment questions the obedience of individuals when put in a sadistic environment. On the other hand in Solomon E. Asch’s “Opinions and Social Pressure”, he gives a basic line reading test to a unanimous group versus his accomplices. Asch’s accomplices give the wrong answer on easy questions and this pushes the unanimous group into a hesitant situation. The author tests the responses of the unanimous group in order to better understand obedience under stress or controversy. In both of the articles, humanity’s obedience is assessed in different circumstances. Without a sense of obedience, society cannot function. Even though there are many similarities between Milgram and Asch, they are different in these three ways. While participants in Milgram’s experiment faced a one on one trial, students in Asch’s tests encountered a one on several trial. In Milgram’s article, results show a higher rate of confidence on a one on one situation rather than a group setting. When the teacher is told to administer the shocks, they are more willing since they cannot see the person in pain. The blind aspect of the procedure enhances the willingness of the participant. In Asch’s experiment, the confidence levels of the unanimous contestants significantly lower due to the publicity and peer pressure. As the instructor holds up the cards, the accomplices each share their answer leaving the unanimous participant last. When the contestants defy the dissenter it creates self-doubt. The dissenter is left feeling insecure and unsure of his answer. “The dissenter becomes more and more worried and hesitant as the disagreement continues in succeeding trials” (Asch 3). These results conclude that confidence plays off of obedience. In addition to the differences between the Milgram and Asch articles, one can point out that responsibility plays a major role in obedience along with insecurity and peer pressure. Throughout Milgram's article, obedience is a common aspect. Obedience and responsibility are like Siamese twins; both carry out the same action. Within Milgram's experiment, most off the responsibility lies in the hands of the experimenter. The experimenter is the one who forces the teacher to carry out any and all orders regardless of how he/she feels about it. For example, during Milgram's tests, the experimenter repeatedly states, "I accept all responsibility, the responsibility is mine, I'm responsible for anything that happens, please continue" (Milgram 81). Furthermore, Asch relays an alternative point in his article. In this section, the contestants convey a false responsibility resulting in excuses. Instead of the subjects blaming the experimenter, they attributed their own poor eyesight and bad judgement. The others who acted independently believed it was their own obligation to call the play as they saw it and failure to do so was also their own responsibility (Asch 144). In final consideration, all of the points efficiently perceive society and how responsibility is a regular concept. At this level, one can expect insecurity and responsibility to be connected to both society and obedience. Along with these points comes gender which also ties to the central theme of obedience in society. In other words, gender is a determining factor in the Milgram and Asch articles. In terms of relating gender to theses articles, Milgram tests on both men and women while Asch only test on men. The past stereotype of men and women is quite a controversy. For example, people assume men work at a real job all day while women stay at home doing chores and cooking for the family. Present day the stereotype still exists but isn't as strong. In Milgram's article he tested both men and women to have a variation of results. Opposing Milgram, Asch tests on only men in order to have a more controlled experiment and similar results. The responses of the genders reflect on their standard conformity and how they are portrayed in modern day. If society did not have both men and women, there would not be an equilibrium of obedience. Although the authors did not specify on gender, their results could have proved a better answer. In final analysis, the Milgram and Asch articles are different in three significant factors. Insecurity, responsibility, and gender all test different levels of humanity's obedience, but, they come together and make society function in a revolving way. Insecurity and peer pressure relate to obedience in the sense that society is put under stressful situations. Responsibility of society reflects on people's obedience. In the experiments, the subjects either took responsibility for their actions or blamed it on someone else. Society has a similar routine to this. People take responsibility for their actions or don't and that decides their obedience. Lastly, gender correlates to how society functions with roles and stereotypes. Throughout the readings, one comes to the general consensus that they are informal. The authors wrote the articles in an extremely relaxed manor forcing readers to look farther for the underlying messages. The authors efficiently explained obedience. The unexpected situations discovered truly accorded to the writers overall purpose. The authors elucidated on the issues presented completely and clearly.

Asch, Solomon E. "Opinions and Social Pressure." Scientific American. 1995: Print. Rpr in Writing and Reading for ACP Composition. Second Edition. Christine R. Farris and Deanna M. Jessup. New York: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2013. 142-147. Print.

Milgram, Stanley. "The Perils of Obedience." Obedience to Authority. 1974: Print. Rpr in Writing and Reading for ACP Composition. Second Edition. Christine R. Farris and Deanna M. Jessup. New York: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2013. 77-89. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Solomon Asch discovered a vast amount of people conformed under group pressure, as well as discovered others may also go against the unanimous majority. Like many of his colleagues, Solomon Asch wanted to find how group pressure effected individuals (176). Asch wanted to discover the reach on which social forces played on people’s decisions. Within the most recent eras we’ve witnessed and read about such things as propaganda having influence over whole societies. Solomon Asch wanted to discover the role in which social conditions played on the formation of opinions in people (176).…

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Obedience shines a light on the negative aspects of humanity, whereas disobedience shines a light on the positive. It has been revealed how people will deny their own senses in order to remain indifferent from the majority (Asch). It was also exposed that some people are okay with possibly killing another human being as long as the victim is not considered their responsibility (Milgram). Both of these examples were a response of the individuals who chose to conform and obey rather than know the difference of what is morally right and wrong. Yet in the midst of it all areas of disobedience allows for different groups of people to come together and fight to evoke incredible change. However, disobedience is much more expensive than obedience. People willing to disobey must first find factors that will lead them to want to disobey and then pay the consequences after. On the other hand, suffering the consequences is a small price to pay compared to living with years of injustice. The factors that were discovered to aid in a person’s willingness to disobey, deception, education, and responsibility, all stimulate a certain degree of reflection. In contrast, members subject to obedience follow blindly with no reflection on the authority’s demands. This evidence directly relates to the findings by both Asch and Milgram. In their cases, the subjects were stripped of their individuality, which resulted in their conformity.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was created to show how well people react when obeying the orders of authority. The subjects who ask the questions were the teachers, and the test subjects who had to answer were the learners. If the learner answers the question incorrectly, the teacher will punish them by giving them a shock that was harmful, but not life-threatening. During the experiment, the intensity of the shock increased, which made the learner yell and scream…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Milgram's experiment, if he would have informed his participants that they were being tested on how far they would go when they were ordered to do so, even if it was against their conscience, the participants would never have gone as far as they did and the research would have been fundamentally flawed. There is no accurate way to test human nature if the participants change their behavior based on what is expected of them. "The tendency of people to portray themselves in a more favorable light than their thoughts or actions, is called socially desirable responding (Lalwani)." Socially desirable responding is one of the problems with the use of surveys, and the problem carries over to behavioral studies. If the "teachers" from Milgram's experiment had been told the real purpose of the study, they most likely would have applied far less shock, if they shocked at all because that is what is socially acceptable. No one really knows how far they will go under order until they are faced with…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience results from pressure to comply with authority. Children are taught to obey from an early age by their care givers, in order for them to conform in society. The authoritarian rule continues through their education and working life, and is then passed on to the next generation. This essay will focus on the work of the American psychologist Stanley Milgram. It will also look at other studies into obedience that evolved from Milgram’s experiments from the early 1960s.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Deviance

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The inspiration for social scientist Stanley Milgram’s work was the acts of Nazis during World War II. His experiments showed how obeying authority could supersede the thoughts of personal conscience. His experiments on obedience showed subjects appearing to inflict electrical shocks to another person on the instruction of an authority figure. The results of the experiment were that repeatedly people were willing continually to administer the shocks for no personal gain or loss, on the instruction of an authority figure. Milgram also worked with Solomon Asch on understanding conformity.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and assessing whether the knowledge gained about human behaviour justifies Milgram’s experiments.…

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Obedience with Authority

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the article “Opinions and Social Pressure”, Solomon Asch writes about how the affects of group pressure can alter a person’s decision. During the investigation, Asch describes how everyone in the group agrees with the answer that they have chosen except for one in which the author calls him the “dissenter (Asch 656)”. Solomon Asch stated that the person who disagreed to the answer quickly became “more and more worried and hesitant as the disagreement continues in succeeding trials (Asch 656).” The dissenter is placed a position where he has to choose the correct answer as a minority of one and this eventually clouded his judgment, which caused him to choose many answers incorrectly. The assumption of that the author has made is that when a person is standing alone without succumbing to the majority tends to have their minds alter due to the social pressure.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram vs. Baumrind

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When individuals disregard their freedom for the good of the whole, they are no longer considered individuals but products of conformity. Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, engineered an experiment to test the ordinary person’s level of obedience. Many of Milgram’s colleagues admired his intricate experiment, and thought that he provided valid information on the complexity of obedience. One of his colleagues, Diana Baumrind, however, strongly disagreed with Milgram and has good reasons to criticize his experiment. She thought his experiment was unethical and very harmful to the social well-being of the participants. In her article, “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, she castigated Milgram’s experiment and provided valid points as to why tests such as Milgram’s should not continue. Both Milgram and Baumrind are obviously concerned with values and effectiveness, but they see them differently which is credible in their writings.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram's, The Perils of Obedience, Milgram states "obedience is as basic an element in the structure of social life as one can point to."(1) Milgram then shows how submission to that authority goes back as far as Abraham. He makes us look into ourselves and see why we obey these commands against our better judgment.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To ignore the ramifications of Milgram’s research is to remain ignorant of the possibles horrors. In many instances certain unmoral acts have been avoided that to an individual speaking up and disobeying orders that they disagree with; however, many end up failing to reverse the problems in which they oppose by simply removing themselves instead of trying to fix the situation. Zimbardo concluded his study by saying “behavioral disobedience [is necessary]...to correct an injustice,” the step that truly defines disobedience (Zimbardo 458). Milgram said that the individualism which America are so proud of might have increasing negative consequences as it so often fails when dealing with moral dilemmas.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s (1963) study of behavioral obedience sought to understand the nature that drives humans to submit to destructive obedience. In his study, Milgram deceived his subject volunteers into believing that the experiment they were submitting themselves to involved learning about the effects of punishment on learning. Under this pretext, a subject “teacher” was to administer electric shocks to a confederate “learner” for every wrong answer in a word-pairing exercise. The subject was to administer shocks in increments, even when the learner protested. The experimenter’s role was to pressure the subjects to continue when they wanted to stop (Milgram, 1963). In doing so, Milgram sought to gauge what it is that influences his subjects to either defy or obey orders. The experiment caused an uproar, not only because of the unexpected compliance of the subjects to harm another, but also because Milgram seemed to ignore that the signs of anguish the participants exhibited during the experiment would subject them to potentially harmful levels of stress. These subjects were placed in an environment that provoked unhealthily stressful emotions, which is not only detrimental to the subject’s health but also speaks poorly of the priorities Milgram’s research group took to ensure the well-being of his participants (Blass, 2004, p. 117). The experiment shed light on the ethics of human experimentation and consequently influenced the creation of the Belmont Report (1979), a series of federal guidelines for the protection of human research subjects, published some fifteen years after Milgram’s studies. With regards to the report, Milgram’s execution of his experiment would prove to violate some of these guidelines, restricting exact replication of the study.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram develops a experiment that puts to test the the question , “Will humans inflict extreme pain to others under the command of higher authority?”. The essay starts off with Milgram explaining the history of obedience by exhibiting the loyalness that was portrayed by followers in historical documents. The experiment that Milgram set up was simple. He elected an “experimenter” who is the authority figure, a “teacher” which is the subject of the experiment, and a “learner” whose only obligation is to act as if s/he is in pain. The teacher in the experiment reads off a simple list of words, and the student must remember the second word of a pair upon hearing the first one again. If the student is wrong, the teacher must inflict pain on the student, increasing the pain each time the student makes an error.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays