Preview

Communinty Involvement in Projec Management

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Communinty Involvement in Projec Management
DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN PROJECT APPRAISAL

1. Introduction
This essay discusses the importance of community involvement in project appraisal. The issue of community involvement has come under scrutiny and has gained increased importance the world over. Community involvement has been seen as essential in achieving development goals. Participatory approaches have been shown to enhance project quality, ownership, and sustainability; and to empower targeted beneficiaries among other benefits. This paper shall start by defining important terms and then go on to discuss the importance of community involvement in project appraisal before concluding. 2. Definition of terms 3.1 Project Appraisal
Appraisal is the analysis of a proposed project to determine its merit and acceptability in accordance with set criteria. This is the last step before a project is agreed for financing. In addition to undertaking financial analysis with regard to the viability of the project, development projects cannot be considered unless they are economically, institutionally and technically sound.
According to Oakely (1995), project appraisal is the process of assessing and questioning proposals before resources are committed. It is an essential tool for effective action in community renewal. It’s a means by which partnerships can choose the best projects to help them achieve what they want for their community. Experience in projects emphasizes the importance of developing an ‘appraisal culture’ which involves developing the right system for local circumstances and ensuring that everyone involved recognizes the value of project appraisal and has the knowledge and skills necessary to play their part in it. 3.2 Community Involvement or participation
According to FAO (2007), community involvement or participation is “....a process of equitable and active involvement of all stakeholders in the formulation of development policies and



References: Asian Development Bank, Mainstreaming Participatory Development Process, Manila, Phillipines, AsDB. Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs (1998), The Art and Science of Participation: A Technology of Participation Manual, Toronto, Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs. Chambers, R. (1992), Rural Appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed, and Participatory, IDS Discussion Paper 331, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK. Clayton, A, Oakely, P., Pratt, B. (1997), UNDP Guidebook on Participation, Oxford, INTRAC. Kottak, Conrad P. (1995). ‘Participatory Development: Rhetoric and Reality’, Development Anthropology 13 (1-2): 1, 3-8 Oakely, P et al (1991), Projects with People- the Practice of Participation in Rural Development, Geneva, ILO. Oakely, P. (1995), People’s Participation in Development Projects, London, INTRAC.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    During the evaluation process an assessment is made on cost, efficiency, programs outcome, programs impact, program implementation, design, and program logic. A reflection of the project scope takes place during the evaluation process where a comparison between what was needed and what was provided is examined. An impact evaluation measures whether the project has achieved its intended outcomes. Cost effectiveness analysis assesses the efficiency of a project. During the evaluation, an outline of the benefits and cost of the program will be reviewed for comparison. Throughout the life cycle of the project, the project team will collect lessons learned. While the project is in cycle, the team members will record both good and bad lessons learned. In essence, the team will record new events that occurred within the life cycle of the project. This type of evaluation will both strengthen individual team members and the project team. The evaluation process will include both internal and external evaluations. The internal evaluation will be done by the project manager. The project manager will have a better overall knowledge of the program and also possess informal knowledge of the program. The project manager is already familiar with the project staff allowing the evaluation process to be less threatening. Finally having the project manager perform the team evaluation is cost effective. The…

    • 3705 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Community development is the tool by which “people empower themselves by increasing their ability to control their own lives in order to create a more fulfilling existence through mutual efforts to resolve shared problems” ( Maser, 1997 )…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, establish the criteria for an ideal system. Consider the needs of the four stakeholder groups of any appraisal system: Appraisers who must evaluate performance; Appraises whose performance is being assessed; Human Resources professionals who must administer the system; and the Senior Management group that must lead the organization into the future. Further, Identifying their expectations at the start helps assure their support once the system is finally designed. Furthermore, ask each group: "What will it take for you to consider this system a smashing success?"…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appraisal system allows me to evaluate what individuals are capable of and the data allows me to see what is required. I then make a judgement on whether individual employees have the capabilities to meet the requirements of the team, in order to meet their future targets, and the strategic aims of the college. The system brings together the information that is needed for me to assess the whole picture and to make decisions for the future, based on what the team as it stands has achieved, and what they are capable of achieving with targets in place. If this does not come up to requirements, then I can take the decision to replace or move people around in the team, or to invest in further training for individuals in order for them to meet the targets that will be set in the…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Community development is an ‘activity or philosophy’ (Kenny 2010) initiated by or facilitated among a group (collectively called community) out of dissatisfaction with existing social, economic or political circumstances (Kenny 2010). There are various aspects and approaches (bureaucratic, grassroots, major or minor changes), but both Tesoriero and Kenny identify common and recurring themes for effective community development work.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Community development draws upon social theories to better understand the society around us. Community development is a structured intervention that gives communities greater control over the conditions that affect their lives. Community development works at the level of local groups and organizations rather than with individuals or families. Community development is a skilled process and part of its approach is the underlying belief that communities cannot be helped unless they themselves agree to this process. Community development has to look both ways: not only how the community is working at the grass roots, but also at how responsive key institutions are to the needs of local communities (maaori.com, 2010).…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Handelman, H. (2010). The Challenge of Third World Development. (pp 1-240). Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions.…

    • 2963 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sanderson, E. & Kindon, S. (2004) Progress in participatory development: Opening up the possibility knowledge through progressive participation. Progress in Development Studies: 4(2) 114.…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluation is defined variously, depending on the subject matter, applied methodology or the application of its results. In general, the definition of evaluation can be stated as „judgement on the value of a public intervention with reference to defined criteria of this judgement. The most frequently used criteria are: its conformity with the needs (of the sector, beneficiaries), relevance, efficiency, impact and sustainability of its effects. More general meaning of the term „evaluation”, emphasising its utilitarian character, is given by Korporowicz[1], defining evaluation as a systematic survey of values or features of a given programme, activity or an object, taking into consideration the adopted criteria…

    • 12289 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References to Use in Ciam

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Akalu, M. (2003). “The process of investment appraisal: the experience of 10 large British and Dutch companies.” International Journal of Project Management 21: 355-362.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    information. This paper is concerned with why India 's policymaking structures have so much difficulty in formulating the "right"…

    • 7832 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monitoring and Evaluation

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How do we know if a project has achieved efficiency, been appropriate to its stakeholders and provided adequate benefit to as many stakeholders as possible? Has the project produced unwanted or beneficial side effects? Has new knowledge been generated and what learnings can we take from the project? Is the project or elements thereof replicable? This essay explores Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) as part of the project cycle. In order to provide context, it defines monitoring and evaluation and distinguishes between them. It then provides a critical discussion on the difference between Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) and conventional Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). Finally, it focuses on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation and how it is used in practice with specific reference to a case study from China by Jianchu Qui & Vernooy.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PAUL MUTINDA

    • 2667 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Cloke, P. J. (ed.) (1988). Policies and Plans for Rural People: An International Perspective Unwin Hyman Ltd.: London…

    • 2667 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PRADEEP KUMAR. (2005), RURAL DEVELOPMENT – A COLLABORATION OF GOS AND NGOS, KURUKSHETRA, VOL.53, N0.10, PP.35-41.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT LESSON 20 PROJECT APPRAISAL Learning Objectives Definition • Scope of appraisal • Steps followed in project appraisal Project appraisal can be defined as the promoter taking a second look critically and carefully at a project as presented by the promoter person who is in way involved in or connected with its preparation and who is as such able to take an independent, dispassionate and objective view of the project in its totality as also in respect of its various components. The person who carries out appraisal of a project is usually an official from the financial institutions or team of institutional officials. Since all ending activities involve risk in a smaller or larger measure, project appraisal aims at sizing up the quality of projects and their ling term profitability aims at minimising the risk of lending by rectifying their weaknesses and improving their quality by incorporating into them features/ safeguards missed by the promoters either because of lack of knowledge or information, Introduction Project appraisal an exercise whereby a lending financial institution makes an independent and objective assessment of various aspects of an investment proposition to arrive at the financing decision. Appraisal exercises are basically aimed at determining the viability of a project and sometimes, also in reshaping the project so as to upgrade its viability.…

    • 5864 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays