Preview

Comedy III Productions, Inc. V. Gary Saderup: Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comedy III Productions, Inc. V. Gary Saderup: Case Study
Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc.

Procedural History

* Comedy III Productions brings right of publicity action against Saderup. * Trial court finds in favor of Plaintiff and Saderup violated the right of publicity statute, awarding damages of $75,000. * California Court of Appeal affirmed the Trial Courts decision. * Saderup appealed to the Supreme Court of California * Supreme Court of California affirms judgment in favor of Comedy III

Issue

Was the appellate court correct in holding that the defendant did violate the terms of the statute and was not protected by the first amendment?

Facts

* Comedy III Productions was the registered owner of all rights of former celebrities known as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The next day, Antonio, who had no idea that Carrie had already sold the books to Norvel, told…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court defended that Atwater did not prove that any constitutional rights had been broken. The 4th amendment was the right being broken in this case. In the 4th amendment “Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate.”…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question in the matter now is whether or not the statistical study was able to prove that McCleskey’s sentence violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court held an…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue in this case is to determine whether the defendant 's action in this case constitute a "substantial step" toward the commission of second degree murder under the new statue. The "substantial step" issue has not yet been…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    EEOC v Target

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) What were the legal issues in this case? What did the appeals court decide?…

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author did not make any vague, ambiguous or unsupported statements in the note. Connolly supported all of her facts with evidence and laws. In the introduction she laid out exactly what was going to be discussed in the three parts of the article so that there would be no confusion and then went on to thoroughly explain each part with support from other journals she found. Each state has the ability to interpret the Tenth Amendment and private party standing the way they want. “Relying on the third-party standing bar, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has ruled that the…

    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNEMNT

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is important that a state does not violate a citizen’s rights to expression and speech. The first amendment protects those rights. This decision will influence future laws by encouraging the states to avoid making laws that are unconstitutional.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case is the same case as the case discussed in position paper one. The reason for that is that there is only one known case relating to the third amendment.…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    V. What legal precedent did this case set? What was the significance of this decision for the U.S. at the time of the decision?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rowe vs Wade

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    "The Court today is correct in holding that the right asserted by Jane Roe is embraced within the personal liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It is evident that the Texas abortion statute infringes that right directly. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine a more complete abridgment of a constitutional freedom than that worked by the inflexible criminal statute now in force in Texas. The question then becomes whether the state interests advanced to justify this abridgment can survive the 'particularly careful scrutiny ' that the Fourteenth Amendment here requires. The asserted state interests are protection of the health and safety of the pregnant woman, and protection of the potential future human life within her. But such legislation is not before us, and I think the Court today has thoroughly demonstrated that these state interests cannot constitutionally support the broad abridgment of personal liberty worked by the existing Texas law. Accordingly, I join the Court 's opinion holding that that law is invalid under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment" (Craig and O 'Brien 17).…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bellah, John L. (2007, April). Cutting the Chase. Police Magazine, Retrieved April 10, 2007, from http://www.policemag.com/t_cipick.cfm?rank=88363…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays