Preview

College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1824 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
Amongst the controversy surrounding the NCAA’s recent crackdown on violations with regards to college programs compensating players and players accepting compensation from universities and outside sources, one question has understandably been brought up. It is a question that was bound to be asked sooner or later, and one without an obvious answer: should college athletes be paid? It is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, question that surrounds the world of college sports. The answer, quite simply put, is no. Allowing universities to pay students athletes to participate in sports would require a complete overhaul of the NCAA rule book. At this stage, too many questions need to be answered: how much would athletes get paid? Where would the money come from? Would athletes in certain sports get paid more than others? This is just the tip of the iceberg. The amount of time that it would take to (re)write this part of the rulebook would be ridiculous. Not only do NCAA officials have to write the new rules, but there would also have to be many revisions made before a final copy is finished. Then the new regulations would need to be approved by the majority of the NCAA universities. And there is no guarantee that would happen with the first edition of the rules, so the process would continue to repeat itself until an agreement is reached. On top of that, the Title IX Act would need to be amended in order to accommodate the new rules in order to ensure equality across all genders. All the time it would take to create a set of rules and regulations and amend the necessary laws to make paying college athletes possible would use up many NCAA resources and cost a lot of money. It is one thing to spend time to make money or spend money to save time, but creating new rules and/or amending old ones would be spending time and money just to give even more money away from the university (to pay the athletes).
The fact that the NCAA and its affiliates would have to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The National Basketball Association pays its players in part of the money they make yearly from ticket sales and whatever else the individual teams do to generate revenue. The promise of a free education just isn’t enough for athletes if the NCAA is this money making machine. If the NCAA does not want to pay its athletes that bring them in the money then I think that the NCAA should not put restrictions on the athletes to enter the professional world, in this case college football players entering the National Football Association. College players should be entitled to monetary compensation and the right to enter the draft and become professional…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The NCAA has forever aimed to maintain amateurism in their sports. There is a very thick line between amateurism and professionalism. Professionalism has been entered when that athlete receives a salary for his or her services. Granting for the payment of student-athletes would defeat the intentions of everything the NCAA exemplifies. If college athletes earn a yearly salary this would make them professional. We cannot forget that these young adults are at college to get an education. One blogger from ESPN Radio 104.5 stated, “The percentage of football players getting drafted is 2%... The other 98% will have college degrees if they stick it out.” (College Athletes Shouldn’t Get Paid). By saying this, he means that it would be pointless to play 98% of players who will never make it pro. That statistic does not cover the other sports like baseball, basketball, and soccer that give out full rides and other scholarships to many of their athletes. Many of those who are getting a free education should be grateful for it, because they are not good enough for the pro’s and are going to use their degree once they get out into the workforce. We cannot forget that these players are amateur and have just gotten out of high school. Players cannot be myopic. They must give credence to the big picture and that they are only young and in…

    • 1010 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The number one reason why college athletes should be paid is because they deserve it. College student athletes are working hard anywhere between 30 to 40 hours a week to be successful and excellent. On average every college athletic season ranks in between ten and 150 million dollars in revenue and zero dollars are rewarded to the athletes. Recently there was about an 11 billion dollar deal made between the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the television station, CBS. The deal revolved around a popular event in men’s college basketball, March Madness. The deal was that from 2011 to 2024, CBS would be the station to air the three weekend long event, and again, zero dollars go to the athletes making the event possible. March Madness doesn’t exist without the athletes and they receive none of the billions of dollars the event makes. Andrew Luck was a starting quarterback for Stanford University and a Heisman Trophy candidate. Fans came to the Stanford football games just to see him play. People purchased the jersey emblazoned with his name and number from the Stanford gift shop and he made absolutely no profit from this. Everything went to Nike and the University itself. Andrew Luck is just one example among the many college student…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are college athlete’s players or employees? The idea of paying a college athlete appears to be outrageous to some. The thought of giving someone money for something they have chosen to do may not appear to be fair. The greatest concern is where to draw the line. Should the decision be based on the amount of money and fame the program generates? Why should athletes be treated special and receive compensation for their contribution to the school? One major factor is that athletes make numerous sacrifices beyond that of a nonathletic student. Many athletes can’t seek employment to help offset the expenses of college because they are on the field or court for the majority of their day. Their time and effort is devoted to that of the school, thus potentially sacrificing their education. In many cases, athletes don’t receive funding for college, which means that not only are they paying financially, but physically to compete. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. If the athletes are fortunate enough to receive a scholarship, usually that is the only benefit. This in turn leads to taking out loans and having to look for other scholarships or sources of compensation, but this doesn’t stop them from being involved in the teams’ activities. The real question is why shouldn’t an athlete in college be paid to play? College athletes are the real moneymakers for the school, and they should be paid to play.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Would you allow a program that makes several million dollars a year to pay 85 of its hardest working employs to be paid zero dollars and zero cents? You might be screaming you head off at the injustice. In most cases I would agree with you, but let me explain. This program is a typical NCAA Division I college football team. College athletes should continue to not be paid under any circumstance.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Should College Athletes Get Paid To Play" Forget about the game-winning touchdown, forget about the cheerleader girlfriend, and forget the pageantry. What about the hard earned money college athletes will never see and earned? In the world of college sports its win or go home, and to the winners go the spoils. Most successful college sports teams rake in millions of dollars in revenue. Steve Spurrier, the coach for the Florida Gators signed a six year contract where he would make a little over 2.5 million dollars a year not including certain benefits like a free car for his wife. So with the institutions and coaches getting rich off their player who is to say that the player does not deserve a share of the wealth? Most college athletes get around 200-250 dollars a month for living expenses and spending money, this is very small compared to the student who has time to work. Some people say that athletes get paid by having a scholarship but if you look at the ulterior motive behind scholarships I think people would change their minds. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school they try to give them scholarships. So the whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the student to come to your school. Scholarships are just a recruitment tactic. Don't confuse what I am saying though I don't think college players should be making millions of dollars but there should be a set salary for all players no matter if they make the highlights everyday or ride the pine. The players should make at least what a person who works making eight dollars and hour would make in a year, and that is a modest salary too. Every player of a college sport puts in countless man-hours of work to their sport instead of going out and getting a job they have to devote all their time to this. A huge debate is should players have the right to their likenesses? If you go to a bookstore…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After numerous scandals over the past several years of college athletes receiving improper benefits, the question has come up whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. College sports are a growing industry, and we have seen money destroy organizations, teams, and players in this industry. The determination and motivation of college athletes supersedes professional athletes by their will to win; therefore, college athletes should not be paid.…

    • 2430 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under any circumstance, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid is…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This proves that colleges don’t have enough revenue to pay sport players. Athletic departments would have to produce the funds, which they are not capable of. Paying college athletes would lead to a major problem for low revenue producing schools. Programs that are unprofitable would fall behind in trying to get quality players, unless they want to increase their deficit spending. The deficit spending could lead to devastating effects on the revenue produced by the colleges (Sanderson and Siegfried122). This would be a problem because colleges that are already in debt would try and keep up. By paying more and more the colleges would create a larger debt. Meaning in the future those colleges may be too far in debt to ever be able to pay it off. Instead there should be a more efficient way to provide compensation to players without creating more debt. It is also not just the low revenue producing schools that could face an increase in debt. Even high revenue producing colleges could face bankruptcy if the zero-sum competitive recruiting process is implemented (Sanderson and Siegfried 130). By paying athletes, schools would in return be having a competition to see who could get the best players while having the least amount of debt. Schools…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The NCAA earns too much money from fans watching the sports that they need to pay athletes. March Madness, Bowl Games, and other events in college sports generate millions of dollars that go straight to the NCAA and its universities. According to Michael Wilbon, an ESPN expert, the NCAA has a contract with CBS and Turner Sports that pays them 10.8 billion dollars through 2024 for March Madness alone. That being the tournament in men’s college basketball in March with 64 teams competing on the biggest stage. Wilbon has always stated that he strongly regrets college athletes getting paid until seeing these TV networks paying the NCAA this amount of money. With this money, why not pay the athletes who performed? In some cases, pay the players more for example if they won a national championship. That gives the players an extra incentive to win and propels them to play better on national TV. I’m not saying use all of these profits to pay players but some…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are thousands of athletes playing for different colleges. They put their time and effort in it, yet they don’t get paid. When athletes play a sport, they have even more stuff to worry about than a regular student. They have to worry about their grades, staying fit to play, stay healthy, attend to practice every day there’s practice, and then after practice go home and do all their work even though they are tired. How much do they get paid for going through all that? Zero dollars. College athletes should get paid to play too.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If college athletes get paid it could potentially take away from the purity of the game. Some of the college athletes aren’t as smart so somebody could bribe them to potentially throw a game. And if they get paid they might not play a hard as they could because they might not want to get hurt or injured. Also because they are getting paid. And if they do get paid they might think they don't have to really try at all and they could make a stupid mistake with their money.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If college athletes were paid there wouldn’t be nearly as much money for the sport department itself because all of the money would go to paying the players. And there would be bias from popular sports like basketball and football between the least popular sports like field hockey and swimming. The more popular sports would get more money and the least popular sports would be left hanging to dry. College coaches get paid a lot and the players see that and tend to be greedy about money. Players behavior could change ad a result of the salaries as well, and not for the better.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is simply not enough money for each athlete to be paid. The NCAA also has a policy called Title IX, which basically states that if one athlete gets money, every athlete at that university has to get compensated for the same amount. Meaning that a women’s field hockey player will be granted the same amount as a starting quarterback who fills up stadiums. Once people hear that this would be the reality if college athletes were paid, their opinions may change. The NCAA is huge on ameatur status and if they ever paid student athletes, they would break the golden rule that college athletes have been running on since the beginning of college sports. A few hundred dollars a month for each athlete isn’t going to stop any of the illicit activities involved with collegiate athletics because this isn’t about needing material things. What primarily causes improper benefit violations is greed. Student-athletes break rules because they want something they normally could not have, not because they needed something most other students had.…

    • 2491 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    So some reasons I think that college athletes should be paid are that some college athletes are unhappy with the title unfairly placed on them: amateur. College athletes should be treated as professional athletes. Their games are on T.V., and so are the professional ones. If the NCAA wanted college athletes to be considered as “amateurs”, they shouldn’t have the games that the athletes play on television. Now anybody can see them, and maybe even mistake them for professionals! I bet a lot of people would agree with me.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays