Preview

Cohabitation- Wiki

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cohabitation- Wiki
Cohabitation is an arrangement where two people who are not married live together in an intimate relationship, particularly an emotionally and/or sexually intimate one, on a long-term or permanent basis

Reasons for cohabitation

When people have more personal freedoms, they seem to forget traditional morals one of which is not living together until they get married. Through press, we know that more and more young people cohabit nowadays, especially among students and industrial workers. Why do they do that?

The first reason is free relationship. Usually, cohabitants are those who come to city from provinces, so they are free to make their own choices. When asked, they say thay they are not bound by their parents constraints, and they are mature enough to make their own decisions.

The second reason is that they can share living expenses. Because they come from provinces, they have to rent houses or rooms for their accommodation, which is not cheap in this city. However, the expense can be reduced if it is shared. Moreover, it is very convenient for a cohabiting couple in many ways. When the male goes to school or is on his shift, the female stays at home to cook their meals, to clean the house or to wash their clothes, and vice-versa.

The last popular reason is called testing. Some cohabitants think that they should test their marital life before really getting married. They say they live with each other to see if they are compatible or not. But statistically, most cohabiting couples usually say goodbye to each other when they graduate from universities. I myself do not think that compatibility has to be learned by cohabition

Objection

In my opinion, cohabitation is the wrong way of living among the youth that causes a lot of serious consequences
First of all, cohabitation destroys romantic love. According to Dr. Nguyen Thi Minh Thai, a psychologist, cohabitation embodies much of the negative factors than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify and explain two reasons for the increase in cohabitation in the contemporary UK (17)…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation is an arrangement where two people who are not married live together in an intimate relationship, usually an emotionally and/or sexually intimate one, on a long term or permanent one. Before 1970, cohabitation was illegal in certain countries, like America. But due to a change in the law, Cohbitation is now a common way of living, all over the world. As well as sex/birth outside of marriage, leaving at least 50% to 60% of couples cohabitating, this started in the late 1990s. This lead to the decline of traditional nuclear families as people want to live in companionship because nearly half the amount of marriages now end in divorce, as well as cohabitating being cheaper, easier and less hassle. The new right see the decline in the traditional nuclear family and increase on family diversity as negative trends on modern society. From the new right perspective, these changes are the cause of many social problems in Britain today.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherlin explains that the majority of people who get married are in their late 20’s to early 30’s in the 21st century. Shockingly, divorce has ben successfully decreasing. People with higher education are less likely to get divorced according to todays statistics. Having an education seems to create a level of succession within a humans lifetime. Education also seemed to affect people who choose to live with a partner outside of marriage. Cherins research conducted that Cohabiters are more likely to have a lower education level than married people, this does not include people with same sex relationships, that unable to get married because of law restrictions. I myself believe that its extremely important to receive an education before getting married and committing yourself to someone else. Having an education helps you map our your life before you decide to make more important decisions such as marriage. It’s not surprising to see that people who cohabit have less of an…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We typically commit one person at a time. From an evolutionary perspective, monogamous pairing makes sense (parents who cooperated to nurture children more often passed on their genes to future generation). Bonds of love are most satisfying and enduring with a similarity of interests and values, emotional and material spot, and intimate self-disclosure. Those who commit with marriage more often endure, esp. after age 20. The divorce rate is 2x higher than 40 years ago, reflecting women's lessened economic dependence and people's rising expectations. Studies show that those who live together before marriage have higher rates of divorce and marital dysfunction because cohabiters tend to be initially less committed to the ideal of enduring marriage and then they become even less supporting during the…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson argued that the main problem with cohabitation is that people can just walk away. Therefore the custody of any children the union produced could be decided by one person up and leaving. Financially everything is typical split and offers no reason to stay together. Both partners in the relationship live in a constant fear of the other leaving. He states that the majority of people who choose to cohabit instead of marry are women who have carriers and lazy men who don’t want responsibility (Wilson).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In sum cultures such as certain countries in Europe view cohabitation as an alternative to marriage while other cultures may view it as a step toward marriage. However, other cultures such the western culture have an in-between view of cohabitation. The book states that the more cases of cohabitation, the more cases of divorce are observed. This was proven through various experiments on different couples. From a personal observation, sexual intimacy, the need to split expenses, and companionship are the main drivers of cohabitation. In my opinion, one needs some time to connect with their partner on a spiritual and emotional level before engaging in sexual intimacy. When sexual intimacy is the dominant driver of the cohabitation which in most cases it is, it stands in the way of getting a deeper understanding of who the other person is. Also, I think that individuals who cohabit have a harder time committing to each other for life as they are able to see the other person’s flaws before they enter a binding marriage. Most of the time, those flaws appear as a deal breaker. The situation becomes more complicated when children are involved. As a young Christian, I believe that one should avoid cohabiting since it brings premarital sex into the equation which is a sin in front of God. However, I think that the church should not abandon those who have fallen into the trap of cohabiting and possibly had children out of marriage. Our purpose is to glorify God and love our fellow humans as Christ loved…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In analyzing the recent growth of cohabitation he finds that its practice began as a short term method of reducing the possibility of divorce as cohabitation was viewed as a sort of "trial marriage". However, as time has progressed this trial period has been severely lengthened and has less frequently yielded marriages as its outcome. Through cited statistics he shows that while in the 1970's sixty percent of cohabitations resulted in a marriage within three years, that number has been drastically reduced to thirty three percent in the 1990's. Cherlin shows that cohabitation has become so prevalent in the United States that the laws of the country have had to be changed to adapt to this recently developed living situation.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1960 less than a half a million people cohabitated. Today that number is closer to five million people along with another half a million same sex couples living together. During the 1990s fifty-six percent of the marriages that occurred were preceded by living together first. There is greater than a fifty percent chance that a woman will marry if she has lived with the man for more than five years. More than half of high school seniors’ believe that it is a good idea to live together before marriage. If you are divorced you are more likely to cohabitate. There are advantages to living together before you are married. Economically it may provide a better life for the two people to be able share household expenses. People who are on public assistance may lose that assistance if they are married. College students may choose to live with their significant other secretly as to not lose their parents assistance. It also provides people with a way to share a life without the legal entanglements of marriage. Some people believe that cohabitation will strengthen their relationships and eventually lead to marriage. Other studies show that living together first show a divorce rate twice as high after ten years of marriage. Cohabitation may not actually be the cause of divorce though. Typically people who with less traditional views of marriage cohabitate together. Because they already value the idea less that may be what leads to eventual…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most dramatic trends of recent years has been the tremendous increase in male-female couples who choose to live together without marrying, a practice called cohabitation. According to the 2000 Census, there are eleven million unmarried people living with an unmarried partner in the United States today, and this number has grown 72% in the last decade alone. While many people like David Popenoe, a Professor of Sociology, on his essay Sociological Reasons Not to Live Together suggests that living together is not a good way to prepare for marriage or to avoid divorce. There is another point of view like an organization called The Alternatives to Marriage Project (AtMP) believes that unmarried relationships should deserve validation and support.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dillard

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In addition, some advantages of cohabitating is that it lowers the cost of living, Emotional support and sexual relations without the commitment of marriage. You can test your compatibility before agreeing to marriage. Cohabitating also will enable you know your partner 's loyalty to you and enable you build trust that will not be shaken if or when the two of you finally agree to settle down in future. Lastly, this method will better help you prepare for marriage by living with someone and tolerating their bad habits, manners and attitudes. Nevertheless, for men and some women, the decision to cohabitate is usually the…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking at my own marriage, my parents, grandparents, and my brother’s relationships, I have develop a small understanding of what the major differences are between being married in a single home or living with a mate unmarried. It was not long ago that the practice of living together without being married started. As well as getting married for “love.” Which is another topic altogether. Today couples very in what they want. Some prefer the freedom of a single life but want a stable partner, while others seek out traditional marriage to start a family.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jennifer Roback Morse quoted “research shows that cohabitation is correlated with greater likelihood of domestic violence,”.There are also fears of divorce will also occur now that you are moved in with that person because you haven’t committed to marriage.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, studies have shown that the longer a couple cohabitates before marriage or engagement the less likely they will be to marry. I have cohabited with one ex and the experience was amazing when we were happy and horrific when we were angry. The experience showed me that there are pros and cons to every living situation. It shed a neutral light onto cohabitation for me. I would not cohabitate with a partner again unless I am engaged to be married within a year’s time. I learned that I enjoy my space, the freedom to come and go as I please, and the ability to maintain my peace in my own personal space. It is not always easy doing those things when you have another person’s space to respect as well. I believe that the goal of cohabitation is marriage but the perception is often skewed. If you aren’t married you will not feel obligated to stay and you will run at the first sign of conflict. I believe marriage is a sacred thing and the coming together of two souls should be respected as such; however, in today’s society it is not. I do not plan on getting married soon because people are getting married solely for love and it is not a stable foundation. I would prefer to build with someone and have a firm foundation prior to marriage versus marrying someone and discovering all their financial debts and inadequacies once it is too…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An estimate of 70% of couples living in the U.S. Are currently cohabiting. I will be talking about the benefits and disadvantages of cohabiting before getting married. I understand that there are many different thoughts or people that don't support this idea. Many believe that you should be marry to the person but it's the 20th century a lot of the old traditions are really not followed as much. For example the marriage should be between a man and woman, the cohabitation and many other ones. My opinion is that we should just let them cohabitate to become responsible and learn by themselves.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays