Cochlear Implants Character Analysis
Class Status:
1. How does poverty and class status impact young children?
I think any child is not able to protect themselves regardless of class status or poverty, but children falling into groups belonging to low classes and poverty are even more at risk in matters not just of growth and development but of existence in general. I am glad that there are various state programs ( WIC, SNAP, Welfare and so on) which supporting families with low incomes, but in general, none of these programs can change the whole picture of poverty and the needs of such families. Reality and statistics clearly show that the chances of a child born in such an environment to grow up healthy and prosperous are extremely insignificant.
2. What did you find out …show more content…
2.Why is the video about more than Cochlear Implants?
This video is more about a specific group of people who have hearing problems and are a minority group, in relation to people who do not face such problems.
3. Who has the privilege or who is the dominant group in this movie? Why? This film represents a dominant group as those people who have the ability to hear and communicate without sign language or Cochlear Implant, or has the opportunity to fix hearing problems by this Implant. Because the ability to hear in this context is accepted as a privilege. Also, the film shows a separate group of people who do not agree with this opinion and defend their point of view.
4. Who are those without privilege? Why? Those who, due to the age, medical contraindications or the lack of parental consent, can not put themselves this implant. Because this deprives them of the opportunity to be like everyone else, to hear and communicate like people who do not have hearing problems.
5. Discuss the power and privilege …show more content…
What were your previous assumptions regarding the members of the Nations response to 911?
I consider the appeal and reminder of the President that people of the country are immigrants from different countries and cultures, very sensible and timely. Despite everything, I agree that in any case, every person should personally answer for what s/he has done, and not the entire country, nation, or family 3. What are your thoughts on how the country responded to members of the Sikh community in association with 911?
My thouths are, the agression to the individual race, nations groups is much more real than it seems and is directly related to what is happening in the country and how the government reacts to it. In this case country showed both sides of the face. On the one hand, life-threatening aggression and hostility towards the Sikhs, ( and all Arabic) allegedly justified by tragedy. On the other hand, the ability of people to empathize and unite to protect the innocent.
Write a Conclusion for the
1. How does poverty and class status impact young children?
I think any child is not able to protect themselves regardless of class status or poverty, but children falling into groups belonging to low classes and poverty are even more at risk in matters not just of growth and development but of existence in general. I am glad that there are various state programs ( WIC, SNAP, Welfare and so on) which supporting families with low incomes, but in general, none of these programs can change the whole picture of poverty and the needs of such families. Reality and statistics clearly show that the chances of a child born in such an environment to grow up healthy and prosperous are extremely insignificant.
2. What did you find out …show more content…
2.Why is the video about more than Cochlear Implants?
This video is more about a specific group of people who have hearing problems and are a minority group, in relation to people who do not face such problems.
3. Who has the privilege or who is the dominant group in this movie? Why? This film represents a dominant group as those people who have the ability to hear and communicate without sign language or Cochlear Implant, or has the opportunity to fix hearing problems by this Implant. Because the ability to hear in this context is accepted as a privilege. Also, the film shows a separate group of people who do not agree with this opinion and defend their point of view.
4. Who are those without privilege? Why? Those who, due to the age, medical contraindications or the lack of parental consent, can not put themselves this implant. Because this deprives them of the opportunity to be like everyone else, to hear and communicate like people who do not have hearing problems.
5. Discuss the power and privilege …show more content…
What were your previous assumptions regarding the members of the Nations response to 911?
I consider the appeal and reminder of the President that people of the country are immigrants from different countries and cultures, very sensible and timely. Despite everything, I agree that in any case, every person should personally answer for what s/he has done, and not the entire country, nation, or family 3. What are your thoughts on how the country responded to members of the Sikh community in association with 911?
My thouths are, the agression to the individual race, nations groups is much more real than it seems and is directly related to what is happening in the country and how the government reacts to it. In this case country showed both sides of the face. On the one hand, life-threatening aggression and hostility towards the Sikhs, ( and all Arabic) allegedly justified by tragedy. On the other hand, the ability of people to empathize and unite to protect the innocent.
Write a Conclusion for the