Co Production Be Jasanoff
Short Essay – The idiom of co-production – The idea of StS
The new civilization of postmodern age, which brings with it a new economy, new political order and a new lifestyle in the ever-accelerating flow of historical time is accompanied by our terms of radical transformation of society to overcome one-sided and narrow rational-scientific and technological world view. At present, technology, social, economics, ethics and other areas do not develop independently of each other, but their relationships grows.
It is necessary to understand the technical and social organizational creations does not exist in a vacuum, but must be adapted to the new context of complex social, cultural and environmental impacts of technological change. Major social institutions of modern societies are constantly becoming more and more technical forming a new complex mutual interactions in complex social technical systems that increase their risk of side effects and untameableness of technological change . "Good" and "bad" to offset their impacts. The distribution of wealth is accompanied by the distribution of risks will cease, that modern man is free to choose the risks, hazards as socio-technical systems are involuntary, and often more than individual and imperceptible. The situation is also complicated due to the continued globalization of social activities, social space and mainly due to increasing global interdependence.
Technology was seen in the history of mankind largely positive but ambivalence of technology in recent years has brought legitimate concerns. The contradictory nature in some cases causes that the effect is not always positive. That negative side, any abuse or technology now afflict humanity most. However, go to the essence of the problem. That is the following. Technology itself is neither good or bad, neither beneficial or harmful. Its functioning, effects, symptoms, and ultimately its existence still depends on the person. Therefore it is necessary to
The new civilization of postmodern age, which brings with it a new economy, new political order and a new lifestyle in the ever-accelerating flow of historical time is accompanied by our terms of radical transformation of society to overcome one-sided and narrow rational-scientific and technological world view. At present, technology, social, economics, ethics and other areas do not develop independently of each other, but their relationships grows.
It is necessary to understand the technical and social organizational creations does not exist in a vacuum, but must be adapted to the new context of complex social, cultural and environmental impacts of technological change. Major social institutions of modern societies are constantly becoming more and more technical forming a new complex mutual interactions in complex social technical systems that increase their risk of side effects and untameableness of technological change . "Good" and "bad" to offset their impacts. The distribution of wealth is accompanied by the distribution of risks will cease, that modern man is free to choose the risks, hazards as socio-technical systems are involuntary, and often more than individual and imperceptible. The situation is also complicated due to the continued globalization of social activities, social space and mainly due to increasing global interdependence.
Technology was seen in the history of mankind largely positive but ambivalence of technology in recent years has brought legitimate concerns. The contradictory nature in some cases causes that the effect is not always positive. That negative side, any abuse or technology now afflict humanity most. However, go to the essence of the problem. That is the following. Technology itself is neither good or bad, neither beneficial or harmful. Its functioning, effects, symptoms, and ultimately its existence still depends on the person. Therefore it is necessary to