Cloning Human Ethical Issues
Ethics of human cloning has become an outstanding issue in the past few years. Even though both sides agree that cloning technology is one of the greatest achievements, they still have a big gap in accepting its ethnicity. On one hand, a number of people have extremely appreciated human cloning because this might be the last chance or even the only way for them to preserve the priceless images from their lovers. On the other hand, many others have claimed that cloning human beings would seriously violate human dignity in terms of laboratory or purposes. However, in the final analysis, I believe human cloning is ethical in some meanings that the ethic should benefit humankind, especially unfortunate ones, rather than to comply strictly with conservative perceptions.
At first, human cloning is obviously ethical when helping hopeless victims to overcome the pangs or, at least, giving them a motivation to keep living, or even making them happier. Ethics or not ethics usually depends on how to approach the matter. In some situation, the mostly right things are inappropriate. For instance, a couple that had been married for three years was in a terrible car accident; the husband would be a vegetable the rest of his life and obviously could not take part in the reproduction of children. For the wife, the only way that she will ever have children is human cloning. Is it fair or ethical if she must live lonely the rest of her life without a son or daughter from her love husbands, or if she only gets kids in accepted ways with a strange man? Moreover, Smith says “A child has right to be better than its parents.” In another word, human cloning technology can give our children better lives such as to live longer with resistance to cancer, heart disease, any familial diseases, and all the other problems. In contrast, some skeptical people doubt that cloning would harm society because fewer people get married. In addition, they also criticize that children may not receive
At first, human cloning is obviously ethical when helping hopeless victims to overcome the pangs or, at least, giving them a motivation to keep living, or even making them happier. Ethics or not ethics usually depends on how to approach the matter. In some situation, the mostly right things are inappropriate. For instance, a couple that had been married for three years was in a terrible car accident; the husband would be a vegetable the rest of his life and obviously could not take part in the reproduction of children. For the wife, the only way that she will ever have children is human cloning. Is it fair or ethical if she must live lonely the rest of her life without a son or daughter from her love husbands, or if she only gets kids in accepted ways with a strange man? Moreover, Smith says “A child has right to be better than its parents.” In another word, human cloning technology can give our children better lives such as to live longer with resistance to cancer, heart disease, any familial diseases, and all the other problems. In contrast, some skeptical people doubt that cloning would harm society because fewer people get married. In addition, they also criticize that children may not receive