Classical Realism and Ir Theory
International Studies Review (2008) 10, 667–679
I: ETHICAL ISSUES IN IR THEORY AND RESEARCH
What Lies Ahead: Classical Realism on the Future of International Relations
Murielle Cozette Department of International Relations, Australian National University
Realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and consequently depicts international politics as a realm of recurrent conflicts among states with very little prospect for change. It is therefore not traditionally regarded as an approach which entertains an idea of progress. E.H Carr famously rejected ‘‘pure realism’’ as an untenable position precisely because it fails to provide ‘‘a ground for action,’’ and advocated finding a delicate balance between realism and utopia, as meaningful political action must include both. While realism certainly entails a degree of pessimism, it is far fetched to claim that realist scholars are radically sceptical about the future of international relations. The article investigates Hans Morgenthau and Raymond Aron, two leading classical realist scholars, and argues that neither advocated a strict version of power politics. On the contrary, they both attempted to find the balance Carr suggested between realist concerns and ideals necessary to spur political action. Both were also very aware of the dangers of nihilism, and upheld hope in the future of humankind, even if this hope remains tempered by pessimism as to whether it will ever realize its destiny.
This article deals with terms which are traditionally regarded as mutually exclusive: realism and progress. E.H. Carr famously summed up the stark opposition between realism and what he calls utopianism. What differentiates these two approaches at the most fundamental level is their stance on the future of international relations. While utopianism is characterized by hope that progress is always at hand, realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and depicts
I: ETHICAL ISSUES IN IR THEORY AND RESEARCH
What Lies Ahead: Classical Realism on the Future of International Relations
Murielle Cozette Department of International Relations, Australian National University
Realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and consequently depicts international politics as a realm of recurrent conflicts among states with very little prospect for change. It is therefore not traditionally regarded as an approach which entertains an idea of progress. E.H Carr famously rejected ‘‘pure realism’’ as an untenable position precisely because it fails to provide ‘‘a ground for action,’’ and advocated finding a delicate balance between realism and utopia, as meaningful political action must include both. While realism certainly entails a degree of pessimism, it is far fetched to claim that realist scholars are radically sceptical about the future of international relations. The article investigates Hans Morgenthau and Raymond Aron, two leading classical realist scholars, and argues that neither advocated a strict version of power politics. On the contrary, they both attempted to find the balance Carr suggested between realist concerns and ideals necessary to spur political action. Both were also very aware of the dangers of nihilism, and upheld hope in the future of humankind, even if this hope remains tempered by pessimism as to whether it will ever realize its destiny.
This article deals with terms which are traditionally regarded as mutually exclusive: realism and progress. E.H. Carr famously summed up the stark opposition between realism and what he calls utopianism. What differentiates these two approaches at the most fundamental level is their stance on the future of international relations. While utopianism is characterized by hope that progress is always at hand, realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and depicts
References: Aron, Raymond. (1945) L’Age des Empires et l’Avenir de la France. Paris: editions Defense de la France. Aron, Raymond. (1955) L’opium des Intellectuels. Paris: Calmann-Levy. Murielle Cozette 679 Aron, Raymond. (1957) Espoirs et Peurs du Siecle. Essais Non Partisans. Paris: Calmann-Levy. Aron, Raymond. (1962) Paix et Guerre Entre les Nations. Paris: Calmann-Levy. Aron, Raymond. (1965) Democratie et Totalitarisme. Paris: Gallimard. Aron, Raymond. (1969) Les Desillusions du Progres. Essai sur la Dialectique de la Modernite. Paris: Calmann-Levy. Aron, Raymond. (1971) De La Condition Historique du Sociologue. Lecon Inaugurale au College de France. Paris: Gallimard. Aron, Raymond. (1976) Penser la Guerre, Clausewitz. Tome II: L’Age Planetaire. Paris: Gallimard. Aron, Raymond. (1990) Le Spectateur Engage. Entretiens avec Jean-Louis Missika et Dominique Wolton. Paris: Press Pocket. Aron, Raymond. (1993) Memoires. 50 Ans de Reflexion Politique. Paris: Julliard. Baverez, Nicolas. (1993) Raymond Aron. Un Moraliste au Temps des Ideologies. Paris: Flammarion. Beitz, Charles. (1979) Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Boyle, Francis. (1985) World Politics and International Law. Durham: Duke University Press. Carr, Edward Hellet. (1974) The Twenty Years Crisis. London: Macmillan. Frei, Christof. (2001) Hans J. Morgenthau. An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. Graig, Campbell. (2003) Glimmer of a New Leviathan. Total War in the Realism of Niehbur, Morgenthau and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press. Kant, Emmanuel. (1988) Idee d’Une Histoire Universelle d’un Point de vue Cosmopolitique. Paris: Bordas. Lang, Anthony, ed. (2004) Political Theory and International Affairs. Hans J. Morgenthau on Aristotle’s The Politics. Wesport: Praeger. Lebow, Richard Ned. (2003) The Tragic Vision of Politics. Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lebow, Richard Ned. (2005) Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations 19(3): 329–336. Morgenthau, Hans. (1945b) The Machiavellian Utopia. Ethics 55(2):145–147. Morgenthau, Hans. (1946) Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Morgenthau, Hans. (1948) The Twilight of International Morality. Ethics 58 (2 January):79–99. Morgenthau, Hans. (1960) The Purpose of American Politics. New York: University Press of America. Morgenthau, Hans. (1962) Politics in the Twentieth Century, vol. 1: the Decline of Democratic Politics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Morgenthau, Hans. (1964) Politics in the Twentieth Century, Vol 3: The Restoration of American Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Morgenthau, Hans. (1965) Vietnam and the United States. Washington: Public Affairs Press. Morgenthau, Hans. (1969) A New Foreign Policy for the United States. London: Pall Mall. Morgenthau, Hans. (1970) Truth and Power. Essays of a Decade 1960–1970. London: Pall Mall. Morgenthau, Hans. (1973) Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred Knopf. Morgenthau, Hans. (1977) The Fallacy of Thinking Conventionally About Nuclear Weapons. In Arms Control and Technological Innovation, edited by David Carlton and Carlo Schaerf. London: Croom Helms, pp. 255–264. Morgenthau, Hans. (1982) In Defense of the National Interest. A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. (Washington: University Press of America). Rengger, Nicholas. (2005) Tragedy of Skepticism? Defending the Anti-Pelagian Mind in World Politics. International Relations 19(3):321–328. Scheuerman, William. (2007) Was Morgenthau a Realist? Revisiting Scientific Man Vs Power Politics. Constellations 14(4):506–530. Williams, Michael J. (2005) The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wong, Benjamin. (2000) Hans Morgenthau’s Anti-Machiavellian Machiavellism. Millennium 29(2):389–409.