Preview

Classical India Vs Classical China Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Classical India Vs Classical China Essay
Classical China and Classical India have many similarities, but some ideas like politics and the social classes can differ from one or another. Politics was a way on how these classical civilizations had a government and what made the government had power to lead their civilization. Social class was a way to put people in ranks which was also a way for the different types of jobs they did. Politics also goes with social class since it showed that only certain types of people could be in the government. Politics and social class in Classical China was quite different compared to Classical India. At this time, politics in the ancient time were mostly monarchy and created a strong bureaucracy. Monarchy in Classical China were mostly based upon the fact of the dynasties. Some famous …show more content…
Aryans were an important role in Indian politics and social structure. Aryans’ brought the Varnas which was an early version of the caste system. The Aryans put themselves as the upper class to make them powerful over the native Indians. Later in history, Chandragupta Mauryan gained power along the Ganges River and created the first dynasty which was the Mauryan Dynasty. Chandragupta’s way of ruling made him rely on ruler’s personal and military power. His grandson Ashoka, governed two provinces. He extended the land to the southern tip by fighting which showed that he was blood thirsty. Later, the Guptas came and developed a tax system and made the caste system in a way that various races could live with each other without conflict. The caste system in India was the social pyramid and consists of priests (brahman); warriors and rulers (kshatriyas); skilled traders, merchants and minor officials (vaisyas); unskilled workers (sudras) and the untouchables (pariah). This system made Indians really rigid and stay in their place. In India, they also didn’t have any slaves since those jobs were mostly done by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Classical India and Mesopotamia are both ancient civilizations with many similarities and differences. Both Mesopotamia and Classical India had law codes and were a patriarchal society. Social mobility was not present in Classical India as it was in Mesopotamia. In both societies there were many things similar and many things different.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han dynasty and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed in roughly the same time frame and overlapped in the years 320 B.C.E. - 220 C.E. developing in different parts of the globes with their own unique geographies. Both the Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed bureaucratic governments that were ruled by kings, but due to the different geographical regions, India’s government was fragmented into local governments. The Han Dynasty of China was structured off of a social philosophy while Mauryan/Gupta India followed a religion which united the subcontinent. The Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires also both developed agrarian economies although their view on the merchant class were nearly opposite.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these cultures needed to keep order and stability within their borders to maintain a prosperous society. Han China and Gupta India both implemented a tight social class…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Rome and Han China’s civilizations applied the same method of economical production. Agriculture was the main factor within the Roman and Han Chinese economies . During annual harvests both empires received a certain percentage of revenue which funded government activities. The class structures included in the Rome and Han China civilizations were very different from one another. An opportunity for improvement of an individual’s economic and social status was very limited in China; whereas in Rome, it was not so limited. Trade and the lack of interference from the Roman government resulted in more economic mobility within the hierarchy. Additionally, Rome and Han China also compared in their agriculture.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the classical period two early civilizations appeared. Ancient Athens arose with its intelligence and love for the human physique, while Han China arose with its strong beliefs of religion and love of nature. Even though Han China and Ancient Athens both have politically strong governments, they are very different in cultural beliefs and social structure because of how they treat women and how they feel about infanticide of babies.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Ancient times, China and India both had their own set of beliefs; Han Wudi excerised Confucianism in China and Ashoka promoted Buddhism in India but Han Wudi was not a lover of Confucian where Ashoka himself practiced Buddhism. However both ruled with a centralized bureaucracy and policed the provinces to maintain order and policies. And lastly, neither had strict policies constricting their people nor did they have much of a justified social structure.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han vs Mauryan

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The social aspects of both empires had a lot in common because gender-roles, family and relationships were looked at in the same way. During the Mauryan/Gupta as well as the Han Dynasty, women were subservient to men and families relied on patriarchs. In both empires there were close knit villages, landowners had power and merchants took second role in the social system. However, the two had their differences. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire put emphasis on caste while the Han Dynasty was based on a social structure. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire’s caste system was an important social bond and a crucial part of the political structure. At the top of the system were the priests, then the warriors and rulers, followed by the merchants, skilled traders and minor officials, after that were the unskilled workers and finally the “untouchables”, who were outcastes and barely considered as people. The strict caste system provided a network of rules by which people could regulate their lives and activities and also promoted public order which helped politically. The caste system was so strictly enforced that no one could intermarry or be moved up a class so it determined where you would be for all your life. The caste system also played a role in religion which encouraged the use of a caste system rather than people look down upon it. On the other hand, the Han Dynasty relied on a highly structured system of classes. The most powerful was the emperor, the nobles and the military officers, who made up the first class. Next came the farmers and peasants who made up the second tier. Lastly, the third class was made up of merchants, commoners and servants. This system…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China during the Qin and Han dynasties and the Mediterranean during the Roman Empire were similar socially and politically because they both had patriarchy, hierarchy, and a centralized government. One aspect that differed was artistically. China focused on visuals such as pictures. While Rome dealt with more three-dimensional ideas such as sculpture and architecture.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The differences between Han China and Rome’s political methods include religion, democracy and social classes. Confucianism played a major part In Chinese culture and politics however their religion did not have as much power over the power over the emperor like Christianity. In Rome, if an emperor did not listen to the Pope, the Pope can then ex- communicate the emperor. The Pope can then replace the emperor. In China, you can’t just have a Buddhist remove an emperor out of power. Secondly, in Rome the citizens had more of a democratic government. Landowners and merchants formed the Roman Republic where they could help pass laws and etc. In China only the emperor had that kind of power. By having a more democratic government the Roman citizens can have more of a say whereas the Chinese citizens can’t. Lastly, in China if you were born…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq- Han China and Greece

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After viewing the documents, it is clear that Classical Athens and Han China are very different politically. Athens focused on the rights of the individual whereas Han China preferred dominance that used an imperialist approach. However, the reason for this difference in political beliefs can be based on the difference of population. It is easier to be a democracy with a smaller population than a larger one. That said it is also easier to rule many people with a select elite. Another difference is that their social aspects are opposites. Athenians believed that everyone should obey the laws of society and turn in those who break them. Han china thought that it is better to obey the rules but should always prefer family over government. Despite many differences, both Classical Athens and Han China thought there should be class distinctions between poor and the wealthy, few and many, free people and slaves.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political developments of Classical China and India were similar in how they expanded their territory, but were different in ways they governed their territory, as well as their attitudes towards religious freedom.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical China and Classical India are one of the most unique early civilizations during the Classical Period. They are known for their contributions to its modern world. China and India are similar and different in many ways. Both China and India had many similarities and differences in politics, economics, and religion.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most conspicuous of the Classical Societies developed in Persia, China, India, and the Mediterranean basin. The Classical Societies were known mainly as an enduring legacies. They were known for their influential ways that affected the way people led their lives. Each of the Classical Societies achieved skillful accomplishments. They had their similarity and differences. Although the Classical Societies were similar in ways that they endured for a long period of time and extended authority over large regions, they differed when it came to beliefs and values.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China and India were both very advanced ancient civilizations. Both agricultural based civilizations made various technological advances. Although China and India shared many similarities, they had differences such as the social system, politics, and the importance of trade in the economy.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caste System And Racism

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page

    Because the caste system was largely based on skin color, racism was and continues to be an extremely prevalent problem in India. When the Aryans, a light-skinned people, developed the caste system, they made sure to rank the dark-skinned natives below them to establish a sense of superiority over the natives. At the top of the caste system were the Brahmans, who were the Aryan priest. Because religion was such an important part of Indian culture, the Brahmans occupied an extremely high and important place in Indian society. Below the Brahmans were the Kshatriyas, or Aryan warriors. The Vaisyas were ranked third in the caste system and were composed largely of merchants and farmers. This was seen as the commoner class. The fourth caste was occupied by the peasant class, called the Sudras. The Sudras were all non-Aryan and were dark-skinned. Their low ranking in the caste system showed what little respect the Aryans held for the natives. Below the Sudras were the lowest-ranking in the caste: the Untouchables. The extreme emphasis placed on skin color and class during this time led to many modern day internal and external issues concerning racial and social inequality. The dark-skinned people of India are still frequently looked down upon, a lasting and damaging result of tje caste system. The caste system prevented the success and development of the native people, a fact that is evident today in India's economy and…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays