Class Conflict In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
Karl Marx is a German philosopher best known for his economic-based theories on how class conflict and historical materialism have shaped history. He outlines and elaborates on these theories in The Communist Manifesto, written by Marx and Friedrich Engels in London in the 1800s. This guidebook to Communism suggested a course of action for a proletariat revolution to overthrow Communism and create a classless society. Marx's ideas on historical materialism are based on the idea that all of history has been about how things are produced, which is central to the idea of the oppressed and the oppressor, which explains the causes of class conflict. In this paper I will be explaining how Karl Marx's ideas of historical materialism and class conflict
…show more content…
This conflict, Rousseau believed, is part of a social contract of sorts created by the bourgeoisie in which the rich and powerful deceived the proletariat, or working class, by making them believe that their views and priorities were the same. This is very similar to Marx's theory of false consciousness, which is the false sense that the middle and lower classes have the same goals and ideals, and is used by the bourgeoisie to subtly control the proletariat. In a departure from the common ideas of most of his fellow Enlightenment thinkers, Rousseau takes the position that if the "natural state" still existed, there would be no property to fight over and no government to create inequality, the nature of human beings is free of conflict. Theoretically, this could be used to explain Marx's idea that all conflict is based on historical materialism and social class conflict. If there were no private property, there would be no owners and workers of the land, which would obviate the need for government to regulate production and labor because there would be no competitive markets in which to buy and sell products. Marx believed that "existence precedes …show more content…
But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few."
This explains Marx and Engels' view that Communism is not about abolishing all private property, but is meant to change private property into common property, thereby changing the dynamic of capitalistic labor to communistic labor, for the good and advancement of all. The differences in Karl Marx and Jean-Jacques Rousseau's philosophies are rooted in Marx's economic view that all class conflict and inequality is derived from historical materialism, while Rousseau is of a more political belief that society and human nature are two separate entities, and that humans are innately good, but that the "state of nature eventually degenerates into a brutish condition without law or morality, at which point the human race must adopt institutions of law or
This conflict, Rousseau believed, is part of a social contract of sorts created by the bourgeoisie in which the rich and powerful deceived the proletariat, or working class, by making them believe that their views and priorities were the same. This is very similar to Marx's theory of false consciousness, which is the false sense that the middle and lower classes have the same goals and ideals, and is used by the bourgeoisie to subtly control the proletariat. In a departure from the common ideas of most of his fellow Enlightenment thinkers, Rousseau takes the position that if the "natural state" still existed, there would be no property to fight over and no government to create inequality, the nature of human beings is free of conflict. Theoretically, this could be used to explain Marx's idea that all conflict is based on historical materialism and social class conflict. If there were no private property, there would be no owners and workers of the land, which would obviate the need for government to regulate production and labor because there would be no competitive markets in which to buy and sell products. Marx believed that "existence precedes …show more content…
But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few."
This explains Marx and Engels' view that Communism is not about abolishing all private property, but is meant to change private property into common property, thereby changing the dynamic of capitalistic labor to communistic labor, for the good and advancement of all. The differences in Karl Marx and Jean-Jacques Rousseau's philosophies are rooted in Marx's economic view that all class conflict and inequality is derived from historical materialism, while Rousseau is of a more political belief that society and human nature are two separate entities, and that humans are innately good, but that the "state of nature eventually degenerates into a brutish condition without law or morality, at which point the human race must adopt institutions of law or